Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post Reply
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by THEBUTCH »

Fair play to Sandland, he's shifted a lot of weight.

Does look like he's gone from fat fat to skinny fat.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by margaret thatcher »

chris byrd wasnt a fat ass as a hw tbf, him cutting down to 175 was much more exttreme and he looked emaciated, which josh doesnt

im not sure i really see any muscle that he's lost, i mean how can you with all that lard in the first pic. i think he just has a funny looking body. does he have a c-section scar btw
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by margaret thatcher »

you see guys taller and more ripped than him at light heavy, tbh he could prob cut even further, he's only 5'10 (shortish even down at 175) and still has no definitiion

at super middle, you have benavidez, plant, and smith between 6'1 -6'3 and clearly cut their fat lower than josh has
emallini
Middleweight
Posts: 1676
Joined: 08 Nov 2013, 12:31

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by emallini »

He needs to lift some weights
leftrightleft
Super Middleweight
Posts: 108
Joined: 03 May 2013, 19:37

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by leftrightleft »

Shocked hes going to light heavy. Crusier wouldve made more sense
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by margaret thatcher »

he doesnt look emaciated at all, not even the slightest bit of definition, even still got a bit of a tum and bulging sides

compare him to 175 unified champ

i'm sure most light heavys and super middles would be heavys too if they were as fat as 5'10 josh was

Image
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by margaret thatcher »

he sure ain't 'very thin' lol

is he feeble? we'll have to see, but he'll be closer to his natural weight than he was at hw
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by margaret thatcher »

Image
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8610
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by coneye »

sTILL GOT A FAIR BIT TOO LOSE , SHOULD AIM FOR SUPER MIDDLE
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by margaret thatcher »

if that's him going for lhw, what division would he be fighting in looking as ripped as these two

Image
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28504
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by Coco »

margaret thatcher wrote: 27 Mar 2021, 19:26 if that's him going for lhw, what division would he be fighting in looking as ripped as these two

Image
While it wasn't a great fight, the skill level both showed, speed of hand and foot, head movement, fitness really put to shame both heavyweight fights and prob neither will win a British title.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by margaret thatcher »

so what happened to this plan? fighting johnny fish next
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23085
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Josh Sandland -LIGHTHEAVY !!

Post by mickey1975 »

I've just spoken to his manager who said he thinks he had a go when he was with Dave Allen but he (his manager) thought it was a bad idea.
Post Reply