Compubox makes no sense again.

Post Reply
aicheligad
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 09 Nov 2020, 11:57

Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by aicheligad »

And again, in favour of Joshua.

According to compubox, Joshua threw +100 punches more, outlanded Usyk in 5 rounds, and landed only 25 punches less.

In Povetkin fight, compubox tell us that Joshua landed more than Povetkin in EVERY round and landed almost 2x more!

Compubox stats in Fury vs Wilder 1 make no sense as well.

There are other examples too, of course, but all of them in favour of the A side, compubox makes no sense and often it's as crooked as Howard Foster's (or even Adelaide Byrd's) scorecards!
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5308
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by greg »

you got a link? thanx..
aicheligad
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 09 Nov 2020, 11:57

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by aicheligad »

greg wrote: 26 Sep 2021, 08:14 you got a link? thanx..
https://ringside24.com/en/47322-joshua- ... unch-stats
aicheligad
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 09 Nov 2020, 11:57

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by aicheligad »

Image
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by DrDuke »

That's impossible, simple as that.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

Those seem accurate. Usyk won the first 4, dominated the last 2 and round 7

Thats the fight I saw
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

And joshua threw a lot of jabs that were blocked hence throwing more
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by margaret thatcher »

josh won 5,6,8

usyk all others clear for me. judges actually had it even after 8 though, but then all 3 gave usyk the last 4

howard foster had josh ahead going into the 10th


defo thought those numbers were a bit generous to joshua. for example didnt think he outlanded usyk in round 10 at all, let alone by 5. i thought usyk outlanded josh in 9 rounds.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by margaret thatcher »

compubox had aj landing more after 10 rounds
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

"Landing more" when you are throwing soft range jabs that may land makes sense though he threw a bunch of them

The power punch numbers make sense to me
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by DrDuke »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 26 Sep 2021, 09:55 "Landing more" when you are throwing soft range jabs that may land makes sense though he threw a bunch of them
There weren't many even of such.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9145
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by gregregegg »

Usyk kept AJ below 20% land on compubox. thats impressive considering he is normaly in the 30s% area.
ldlamb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 759
Joined: 30 Jun 2007, 23:51

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by ldlamb »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 26 Sep 2021, 09:38 And joshua threw a lot of jabs that were blocked hence throwing more
This
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by margaret thatcher »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 26 Sep 2021, 09:55 "Landing more" when you are throwing soft range jabs that may land makes sense though he threw a bunch of them

The power punch numbers make sense to me
accounting for all punches that landed, even if soft flicky range finders, i just dont see aj having landed more in the fight going into the 11th
adislav123
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1745
Joined: 10 Nov 2012, 19:05

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by adislav123 »

u can't cause he simply didn't.

roboticly sticking out left and right hands without any commitment, plain missing or glancing a glove ISN'T landing punches.

but that's what they count, trying to be subtle but failing. always favouring the a side.

and not by mistake.

compubox is crooked to the core. paid off to underline the (this time) failed set up.

trying to legitimize robberies with the 'official numbers' & 'numbers don't lie' shtick.

well, they do.

instrument of corruption. simple as that.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101078
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Also guys, just cuts yu land more doesn’t mean you with the round. Usyk’s punches seemed to do more damage than AJ’s.

AJ might have landed 3 jabs to the body, and then Usyk lands a left hook and nearly has AJ on the ground.

We’re giving that to Usyk aren’t we?
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by jezzamundo »

Looks about right to me - Joshua threw a lot of pawing jabs that don't win rounds but are counted by Compubox. TBH the only round I've seen where Compubox didn't seem to match the action was the 3rd round of Mayweather vs Pacquiao which I see as competitive but a clear Manny round, though Compubox had Mayweather outlanding him 3:1 in that round, which frankly had/has me scratching my head.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by margaret thatcher »

jezzamundo wrote: 27 Sep 2021, 22:45 Looks about right to me - Joshua threw a lot of pawing jabs that don't win rounds but are counted by Compubox. TBH the only round I've seen where Compubox didn't seem to match the action was the 3rd round of Mayweather vs Pacquiao which I see as competitive but a clear Manny round, though Compubox had Mayweather outlanding him 3:1 in that round, which frankly had/has me scratching my head.
you think josh was outlanding usyk to start the 11th?
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Compubox makes no sense again.

Post by jezzamundo »

margaret thatcher wrote: 27 Sep 2021, 22:47
jezzamundo wrote: 27 Sep 2021, 22:45 Looks about right to me - Joshua threw a lot of pawing jabs that don't win rounds but are counted by Compubox. TBH the only round I've seen where Compubox didn't seem to match the action was the 3rd round of Mayweather vs Pacquiao which I see as competitive but a clear Manny round, though Compubox had Mayweather outlanding him 3:1 in that round, which frankly had/has me scratching my head.
you think josh was outlanding usyk to start the 11th?
In meaningful punches, certainly not. In the number of times, the glove made contact a-la amateur scoring - perhaps, though still probably not. Compubox definitely isn't 100% accurate, but I think it's usually pretty close. I had Usyk winning 116-112 for the record, but could see 115-113 or 117-111 as viable scorecards too.
Post Reply