Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by jezzamundo »

Lackeos wrote: 10 Nov 2021, 04:02 Froch is a good boxer, but he shouldn't be expected to perform better than Kovalev and Golovkin did. Alvarez would probably beat Froch 8-4.
Why group Kovalev and GGG together? Most agree GGG clearly beat Canelo in the first fight and got robbed, while the second fight was close and could have gone either way.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by jezzamundo »

H8Usernames wrote: 10 Nov 2021, 07:40 Froch was so shit that he lost to lousy Mikkael Kessler and someone wants to argue that he would have beaten Canelo? Ridiculous.
Good chance Kessler would have beaten Canelo too - he would certainly clean up today's SMW division. Froch-Kessler 1 was a close fight that could have gone either way - both great, prime super middleweights.
ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by ironbeard »

Imagine Froch’s right hand landing every time Plant’s did.
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by H8Usernames »

jezzamundo wrote: 12 Nov 2021, 19:35
H8Usernames wrote: 10 Nov 2021, 07:40 Froch was so shit that he lost to lousy Mikkael Kessler and someone wants to argue that he would have beaten Canelo? Ridiculous.
Good chance Kessler would have beaten Canelo too - he would certainly clean up today's SMW division. Froch-Kessler 1 was a close fight that could have gone either way - both great, prime super middleweights.
Just like he beat Calzaghe.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by jezzamundo »

H8Usernames wrote: 12 Nov 2021, 22:30
jezzamundo wrote: 12 Nov 2021, 19:35
H8Usernames wrote: 10 Nov 2021, 07:40 Froch was so shit that he lost to lousy Mikkael Kessler and someone wants to argue that he would have beaten Canelo? Ridiculous.
Good chance Kessler would have beaten Canelo too - he would certainly clean up today's SMW division. Froch-Kessler 1 was a close fight that could have gone either way - both great, prime super middleweights.
Just like he beat Calzaghe.
Calzaghe is a top 3 all-time super middleweight who would likely have schooled Canelo worse than he did Kessler.
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by H8Usernames »

jezzamundo wrote: 13 Nov 2021, 02:12
H8Usernames wrote: 12 Nov 2021, 22:30
jezzamundo wrote: 12 Nov 2021, 19:35

Good chance Kessler would have beaten Canelo too - he would certainly clean up today's SMW division. Froch-Kessler 1 was a close fight that could have gone either way - both great, prime super middleweights.
Just like he beat Calzaghe.
Calzaghe is a top 3 all-time super middleweight who would likely have schooled Canelo worse than he did Kessler.
You keep telling yourself that, it's ok.
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by apollo creed »

jezzamundo wrote: 12 Nov 2021, 19:35
H8Usernames wrote: 10 Nov 2021, 07:40 Froch was so shit that he lost to lousy Mikkael Kessler and someone wants to argue that he would have beaten Canelo? Ridiculous.
Good chance Kessler would have beaten Canelo too - he would certainly clean up today's SMW division. Froch-Kessler 1 was a close fight that could have gone either way - both great, prime super middleweights.
True. Kessler would beat Badou Jack, Groves, DeGale, Abraham and Bute too.
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by apollo creed »

jezzamundo wrote: 13 Nov 2021, 02:12
H8Usernames wrote: 12 Nov 2021, 22:30
jezzamundo wrote: 12 Nov 2021, 19:35

Good chance Kessler would have beaten Canelo too - he would certainly clean up today's SMW division. Froch-Kessler 1 was a close fight that could have gone either way - both great, prime super middleweights.
Just like he beat Calzaghe.
Calzaghe is a top 3 all-time super middleweight who would likely have schooled Canelo worse than he did Kessler.
:TU:

Prime Calzaghe, RJJ and Ward would make gingerbread from this version of Canelo.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by squiggy »

And just since I don't think I've seen anyone mention it before, I think BHop would beat Canelo at every weight they've both fought at.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

Canelo is a better fighter than kessler and froch. Thats very clear

Maybe they hurt him, but they arent out boxing him
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by margaret thatcher »

froch / kessler vs plant, bjs, and smith at smw

what happens?
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

margaret thatcher wrote: 14 Nov 2021, 22:52 froch / kessler vs plant, bjs, and smith at smw

what happens?


Bjs might beat kessler. The rest are wins.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

Froch and kessler would have hard a tough time with the way danny jacobs fights

Ggg canelo beat wins v kessler
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

I like froch but but he needed home cooking to beat andre dirrel and a miracle to beat jermain taylor
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by candyslim »

In the words of Mandy Rice-Davies ... "Well he would say that wouldn't he?"
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by Mexi-Box »

In his prime, he wasn't even in Canelo's galaxy. Not even the best fighter around his time/weight, Andre Ward, is close to Canelo's resume. Someone seriously needs to give this guy a clue. His resume is god-awful from a historical perspective. And no, he wouldn't even beat Saunders, let alone Canelo. 100%, Saunders would've cleaned out 168 when Ward moved up and it was mainly Froch and Groves.
bobcatbox
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1446
Joined: 28 Jun 2020, 12:51

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by bobcatbox »

Mexi-Box wrote: 17 Nov 2021, 19:15 In his prime, he wasn't even in Canelo's galaxy. Not even the best fighter around his time/weight.
Yeah this is a good way to sum it up. I’m as big a fan of the Cobra as anybody, but his wins usually came down to landing a well timed big right hand or getting a good shot in late. The Groves and Taylor fights (his biggest wins) are good examples. He would not be able to land such a shot on Canelo late in the fight.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Let's calm down here.

At 168, Canelo has done nowhere near enough to suggest he would have beaten Froch with ease.
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by apollo creed »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 04:14 Let's calm down here.

At 168, Canelo has done nowhere near enough to suggest he would have beaten Froch with ease.
True but let's see how Canelo does vs Bivol, Beterbiev, Joe Smith and Makabu. If he does beat them fair&square then we could assume that Canelo would be competitive vs S6 guys, RJJ or Calzaghe.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

apollo creed wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 08:20
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 04:14 Let's calm down here.

At 168, Canelo has done nowhere near enough to suggest he would have beaten Froch with ease.
True but let's see how Canelo does vs Bivol, Beterbiev, Joe Smith and Makabu. If he does beat them fair&square then we could assume that Canelo would be competitive vs S6 guys, RJJ or Calzaghe.
It doesn't look to me like he has any intention of fighting Bivol, Beterbiev, or Joe Smith.
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5308
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by greg »

..of course there's no way of knowing but I tend to agree with Froch provided Canelo ist clean and venue neutral..
bobcatbox
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1446
Joined: 28 Jun 2020, 12:51

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by bobcatbox »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 04:14 Let's calm down here.

At 168, Canelo has done nowhere near enough to suggest he would have beaten Froch with ease.
Jimmy McDonnell, man, I don’t think that’s super fair. Canelo beat every belt holder at 168. Froch had an awesome and fun career but let’s be honest did he beat anybody that you think Canelo couldn’t have handled just as easily?

I know we’re comparing apples to oranges here, but I’m not sure Froch could’ve beaten Callum Smith or Billy Joe. Smith would have been a formidable opponent for Froch, and BJS’s style is a really tough matchup for the Cobra.
ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by ironbeard »

bobcatbox wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 10:59
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 04:14 Let's calm down here.

At 168, Canelo has done nowhere near enough to suggest he would have beaten Froch with ease.
Jimmy McDonnell, man, I don’t think that’s super fair. Canelo beat every belt holder at 168. Froch had an awesome and fun career but let’s be honest did he beat anybody that you think Canelo couldn’t have handled just as easily?

I know we’re comparing apples to oranges here, but I’m not sure Froch could’ve beaten Callum Smith or Billy Joe. Smith would have been a formidable opponent for Froch, and BJS’s style is a really tough matchup for the Cobra.
Pascal
Taylor
Johnson
Bute
Groves
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

bobcatbox wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 10:59
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 04:14 Let's calm down here.

At 168, Canelo has done nowhere near enough to suggest he would have beaten Froch with ease.
Jimmy McDonnell, man, I don’t think that’s super fair. Canelo beat every belt holder at 168. Froch had an awesome and fun career but let’s be honest did he beat anybody that you think Canelo couldn’t have handled just as easily?

I know we’re comparing apples to oranges here, but I’m not sure Froch could’ve beaten Callum Smith or Billy Joe. Smith would have been a formidable opponent for Froch, and BJS’s style is a really tough matchup for the Cobra.
The more styles you face at a given weight, the more problems you encounter.

Canelo struggled with GGG, and he wasn't a 168 pound fighter.

I would have fancied Froch to beat Smith and Saunders, Saunders might have been trickier, but he would have been running like a thief all night, - who in hell has Saunders ever beaten at 168?

I think Canelo is being rather overrated at 168, just not enough of a body of work.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Froch: "In my prime at about 34, 35-years-old against Canelo Alvarez, I think I would have been too much for him."

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

ironbeard wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 13:04
bobcatbox wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 10:59
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 18 Nov 2021, 04:14 Let's calm down here.

At 168, Canelo has done nowhere near enough to suggest he would have beaten Froch with ease.
Jimmy McDonnell, man, I don’t think that’s super fair. Canelo beat every belt holder at 168. Froch had an awesome and fun career but let’s be honest did he beat anybody that you think Canelo couldn’t have handled just as easily?

I know we’re comparing apples to oranges here, but I’m not sure Froch could’ve beaten Callum Smith or Billy Joe. Smith would have been a formidable opponent for Froch, and BJS’s style is a really tough matchup for the Cobra.
Pascal
Taylor
Johnson
Bute
Groves
Taylor would have been a tricky one, at either 160 or 168, people write Taylor off now, but he was a great boxer, and had some very good physical gifts, he was somewhat on the slide, by the time he got to Froch, but he still had great boxing skills.

Johnson, - too one dimensional, but he'd have given Canelo 12 hard paced rounds for certain, as he was rock hard.

Groves, yeah, never quite sure how to rate groves, had a serious dig, could box, but not sure how great he really was, though he certainly handled Eubank Jr with ease.

Bute, looked a million dollars until Froch spiked his career. Good call.

Pascal, good fighter, and went on to do good things at 175 too, a very aggressive fighter, and Froch went to war with him and won.
Post Reply