TonyJ wrote: ↑28 Nov 2021, 01:12
KiwiRider wrote: ↑28 Nov 2021, 01:11
Not over rated, just a bit old, out sized and high milage from 400 am fights.
Not age but yea maybe undersized a bit but no one said that when he was winning not until he lost so it sounds like an excuse.
Imo both Teo and Loma fell for they’re own hype.
I for one knew that Lomachenko was too small to be moving up to 135.
He was meant to excel at 126,which he did. And 130 as well. But 126 was Really his true calling,as far as attaining Greatness Status. He's a Very Skilled "Little" Boxer. Remember and consider to emphasize the word "Little", when judging his skill-set and such. His first profession/specialty was Ballet Dancing as well. Ala-Jean Claude Van Damme.
Boxing wasn't even his first big time persuit. And if Lomachenko had only had,say,200,instead of 400 amauter bouts,and he just focused on remaining at 126,instead of jumping weight-classes like a money hungry fool, then we could've been very well discussing about Lomachenko with his 35-0 or 40-0 record. Especially being that That Cheating Coward Bum Salido should've been DQ'd,or at least deducted Multiple,and I'll say it again, Multiple ! Freaking points ! for his dirty dishonorable cowardly tactics !
Look at Cotto-Urkal. Back in 2006. That ref was deducting point after point after point from Urkal,and he wasn't fighting Half as Dirty as Salido ! Double standards much..?! Biased against Urkal,and then biased against Lomachenko. Double Standards ! But hey,that's okay for the Biased Haters I guess. Dirty Corruptive Boxing Politics personified !
![[icon_e_geek.gif] :geek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_geek.gif)