What’s more impressive
What’s more impressive
Which impresses you more whilst watching boxing:-
A) A boxer with a chin of steel who never seems hurt even after heavy shots
B) watching a KO artist Ko his victims
A) A boxer with a chin of steel who never seems hurt even after heavy shots
B) watching a KO artist Ko his victims
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: What’s more impressive
the kos, there is a more spectacular visual element to them and more work goes into getting them. jumps out at me more . we watch highlight reels of knockouts but rarely as much just guys taking shots
although it depends on the situation too. if there's a huge mismatch for example, sometimes the ko actually leaves a bitter/disgusted taste instead, like why the f@ck did that need to happen
although it depends on the situation too. if there's a huge mismatch for example, sometimes the ko actually leaves a bitter/disgusted taste instead, like why the f@ck did that need to happen
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5349
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
Re: What’s more impressive
I've always had maximum respect for the chin of steel types
Re: What’s more impressive
More impressed with a granite chin.
would prefer to watch a KO artist do his thing.
would prefer to watch a KO artist do his thing.
Re: What’s more impressive
Neither.
I like a boxer throwing all sorts of combinations, moving like a dancer, in and out of range ans making the other guy hit air.
I like a boxer throwing all sorts of combinations, moving like a dancer, in and out of range ans making the other guy hit air.
Re: What’s more impressive
The problem with some of the granite chin types is they rely on it too much and as their career starts to wind down it can get painful watching them shipping heavy repeated blows that are likely to have a negative effect on them later in life.
Ali, while not having the cast iron chin of someone like Chuvalo, could take a lot of shots to the head and no one can tell me that it didn't effect him after he retired. Yeah, yeah, it was Parkinsons etc and nothing to do with boxing. I'm not so sure.
Ali, while not having the cast iron chin of someone like Chuvalo, could take a lot of shots to the head and no one can tell me that it didn't effect him after he retired. Yeah, yeah, it was Parkinsons etc and nothing to do with boxing. I'm not so sure.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23078
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: What’s more impressive
I prefer a pure boxer.
Re: What’s more impressive
KOs are definitely more spectacular than somebody standing his ground after receiving shots.
Re: What’s more impressive
Definitely ko better to watch as we all look back on the highlights of them but it’s definitely impressive having a granite chin although sooner or later most get wobbled or stopped at some point
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: What’s more impressive
McCall never tasted the canvas, although possibly he was floored by Greg Page in sparring. Although I may be misremembering that. Although if McCall had fought as many times as Chavez maybe he would have had more dicey moments. Chavez didn’t get floored until the Frankie Randell fight. Had an usually thick skull they said.
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6559
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: What’s more impressive
McCall had a ridiculous chin and a huge bowling ball shaped head. I bet his skull was like 2 inches thickpolecateddy wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021, 07:55McCall never tasted the canvas, although possibly he was floored by Greg Page in sparring. Although I may be misremembering that. Although if McCall had fought as many times as Chavez maybe he would have had more dicey moments. Chavez didn’t get floored until the Frankie Randell fight. Had an usually thick skull they said.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103107
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: What’s more impressive
Golovkin had them both..
He was quite the total package..
Power, accuracy, iron chin, so he used his face as a defence. KO power. Could box and jab, cut the ring off as well.
He was quite the total package..
Power, accuracy, iron chin, so he used his face as a defence. KO power. Could box and jab, cut the ring off as well.
Re: What’s more impressive
Same, that's why I liked peak Khan, despite his personality, which is saying something.
A pure boxer with minimal chin is way more exciting to watch than a guy taking big shots repeatedly.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23078
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: What’s more impressive
I don't think Khan is a pure boxer. He's just stupidly fast. He's not a bad bloke, either. Just not the most intelligent.
-
TheLeprechaun
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5167
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: What’s more impressive
I wouldn't say Khan was a pure boxer at all. He was a guy with elite hand speed who threw a lot of flurries that a lot of fighters just couldn't handle in the end. His strengths were his raw athleticism and speed of hand. You wouldn't describe him as a technician like the likes of a Carlos Monzon or Juan Manuel Marquez kind of guy would you?