What’s more impressive

Post Reply
Foggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 12:07

What’s more impressive

Post by Foggy »

Which impresses you more whilst watching boxing:-

A) A boxer with a chin of steel who never seems hurt even after heavy shots

B) watching a KO artist Ko his victims
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39334
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by margaret thatcher »

the kos, there is a more spectacular visual element to them and more work goes into getting them. jumps out at me more . we watch highlight reels of knockouts but rarely as much just guys taking shots

although it depends on the situation too. if there's a huge mismatch for example, sometimes the ko actually leaves a bitter/disgusted taste instead, like why the f@ck did that need to happen
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by dr_devious »

I've always had maximum respect for the chin of steel types
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by oogiebe »

More impressed with a granite chin.

would prefer to watch a KO artist do his thing.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26628
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by KiwiRider »

Neither.
I like a boxer throwing all sorts of combinations, moving like a dancer, in and out of range ans making the other guy hit air.
Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by Giancarlo »

The problem with some of the granite chin types is they rely on it too much and as their career starts to wind down it can get painful watching them shipping heavy repeated blows that are likely to have a negative effect on them later in life.

Ali, while not having the cast iron chin of someone like Chuvalo, could take a lot of shots to the head and no one can tell me that it didn't effect him after he retired. Yeah, yeah, it was Parkinsons etc and nothing to do with boxing. I'm not so sure.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by mickey1975 »

I prefer a pure boxer.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by DrDuke »

KOs are definitely more spectacular than somebody standing his ground after receiving shots.
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by dan28uk »

Definitely ko better to watch as we all look back on the highlights of them but it’s definitely impressive having a granite chin although sooner or later most get wobbled or stopped at some point
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by polecateddy »

dan28uk wrote: 03 Dec 2021, 05:31 Definitely ko better to watch as we all look back on the highlights of them but it’s definitely impressive having a granite chin although sooner or later most get wobbled or stopped at some point
McCall never tasted the canvas, although possibly he was floored by Greg Page in sparring. Although I may be misremembering that. Although if McCall had fought as many times as Chavez maybe he would have had more dicey moments. Chavez didn’t get floored until the Frankie Randell fight. Had an usually thick skull they said.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by JamesPhilips »

polecateddy wrote: 03 Dec 2021, 07:55
dan28uk wrote: 03 Dec 2021, 05:31 Definitely ko better to watch as we all look back on the highlights of them but it’s definitely impressive having a granite chin although sooner or later most get wobbled or stopped at some point
McCall never tasted the canvas, although possibly he was floored by Greg Page in sparring. Although I may be misremembering that. Although if McCall had fought as many times as Chavez maybe he would have had more dicey moments. Chavez didn’t get floored until the Frankie Randell fight. Had an usually thick skull they said.
McCall had a ridiculous chin and a huge bowling ball shaped head. I bet his skull was like 2 inches thick
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103107
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Golovkin had them both..

He was quite the total package..

Power, accuracy, iron chin, so he used his face as a defence. KO power. Could box and jab, cut the ring off as well.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26628
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by KiwiRider »

mickey1975 wrote: 03 Dec 2021, 04:10 I prefer a pure boxer.
Same, that's why I liked peak Khan, despite his personality, which is saying something.
A pure boxer with minimal chin is way more exciting to watch than a guy taking big shots repeatedly.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by mickey1975 »

KiwiRider wrote: 03 Dec 2021, 13:23
mickey1975 wrote: 03 Dec 2021, 04:10 I prefer a pure boxer.
Same, that's why I liked peak Khan, despite his personality, which is saying something.
A pure boxer with minimal chin is way more exciting to watch than a guy taking big shots repeatedly.
I don't think Khan is a pure boxer. He's just stupidly fast. He's not a bad bloke, either. Just not the most intelligent.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5167
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: What’s more impressive

Post by TheLeprechaun »

KiwiRider wrote: 03 Dec 2021, 13:23
mickey1975 wrote: 03 Dec 2021, 04:10 I prefer a pure boxer.
Same, that's why I liked peak Khan, despite his personality, which is saying something.
A pure boxer with minimal chin is way more exciting to watch than a guy taking big shots repeatedly.
I wouldn't say Khan was a pure boxer at all. He was a guy with elite hand speed who threw a lot of flurries that a lot of fighters just couldn't handle in the end. His strengths were his raw athleticism and speed of hand. You wouldn't describe him as a technician like the likes of a Carlos Monzon or Juan Manuel Marquez kind of guy would you?
Post Reply