BT Sports

maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: BT Sports

Post by maverick23 »

Manchester Hitman wrote: 15 Jan 2022, 18:26 March 19th - headlined by Dubois and Avanesyan also apparently on the card, and neither have an opponent sorted. I don’t know what’s going on with Warren, but things are looking very iffy at the moment.
It’s weird isn’t it. It’s been a while since both Dubois and Avanesyan fought - why is it taking so long to get something announced?!

I thought they really messed up with Joyce last year too. Crazy they only got him out once considering the exposure he received from the Dubois fight.
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: BT Sports

Post by dan28uk »

maverick23 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 04:59
mickey1975 wrote: 15 Jan 2022, 21:00
595179 wrote: 15 Jan 2022, 20:34

Well, for starters, Uncle Bob pays Fury's cheques, not Frank. The last time Frank picked up the tab was in Ireland against Pianeta and that was a loooooong time ago. The best you could possibly hope to connect Frank any of the fights since would be advisor.



I'll bite and say........

AJ (#2 at HW)
Okolie (#4 at CW)
Callum Smith (#1 at MW) Yarde #11
BJS (#2 at SMW) or John Ruder (#4 at SMW) Parker #14
Liam Smith (#5 at SWW)


After that, you're just dreaming man, have a whisky and go to bed.
Bjs is retired. Is L Smith with Hearn? Didn't FW return big profits this year?
Billy hasn’t announced his retirement and still has one fight on his deal with Matchroom from memory.

Liam Smith is with Matchroom. They were ok with him fighting on the Russian show.

And no, Frank didn’t return big profits this year. The company that do the promotional activities has Frank’s sons as directors. It made £4m profit last year but still has an overall net liability position of £6.4m. The controlling party of the company is a Mrs S Warren. For what it’s worth Matchroom’s profit before tax was 5 times higher than that.

I would imagine the bulk of Queensbury’s profit comes from Tyson. Do they really do enough to justify it?

Due to the amount of times FW has wound up companies to avoid paying people I don’t think he’d be allowed to be actually on the books for it.
brilliant detective work sir :salut:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BT Sports

Post by mickey1975 »

Just at a glance, Hughie, Marshall, Frankham, Ritson, Burns....
Let me know when Saunders is boxing again.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BT Sports

Post by mickey1975 »

Campbell and Jonas? You have to be trolling.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BT Sports

Post by mickey1975 »

Eggington?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23187
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: BT Sports

Post by handsofstone »

Someone on twitter said if the DAZN deal with BT goes through then Eddie has to tweet out Frank to "welcome him to the team" :lol:
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: BT Sports

Post by maverick23 »

mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 05:52 Just at a glance, Hughie, Marshall, Frankham, Ritson, Burns....
Let me know when Saunders is boxing again.
If you really think Frank has the strongest stable in the country, why can’t he announce any shows? Or make many good fights?
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: BT Sports

Post by maverick23 »

handsofstone wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 05:58 Someone on twitter said if the DAZN deal with BT goes through then Eddie has to tweet out Frank to "welcome him to the team" :lol:
It’ll be interesting to see how it works.

Boxing will be massively down the priority list re: the sports BT have rights to. Frank seems to think any boxing on BT has to go through him but who knows. Frank’s a survivor so, if he’s not happy, will work something out.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BT Sports

Post by mickey1975 »

handsofstone wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 05:58 Someone on twitter said if the DAZN deal with BT goes through then Eddie has to tweet out Frank to "welcome him to the team" :lol:
Has he bought DAZN?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BT Sports

Post by mickey1975 »

maverick23 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:01
mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 05:52 Just at a glance, Hughie, Marshall, Frankham, Ritson, Burns....
Let me know when Saunders is boxing again.
If you really think Frank has the strongest stable in the country, why can’t he announce any shows? Or make many good fights?
I'd say Arthur-Yarde and Dubois-Joyce were good in house fights. And I never said he had the strongest. I said name five better than the ones I mentioned. Knock Canelo off that list as well.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BT Sports

Post by mickey1975 »

Khan-Brook couldn't be done, AJ-Wilder couldn't be done, Fury-AJ couldn't be done. Who is the common denominator in this?
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: BT Sports

Post by maverick23 »

mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:11
maverick23 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:01
mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 05:52 Just at a glance, Hughie, Marshall, Frankham, Ritson, Burns....
Let me know when Saunders is boxing again.
If you really think Frank has the strongest stable in the country, why can’t he announce any shows? Or make many good fights?
I'd say Arthur-Yarde and Dubois-Joyce were good in house fights. And I never said he had the strongest. I said name five better than the ones I mentioned. Knock Canelo off that list as well.
Yeah - they were good in-house fights. But one was over a year ago - surely the shows the problem in his shows in 2021 that you have to go back further to find a second fight to mention?

You said ‘easily the best stable in Britain’. If he has that then why can’t he announce any shows?
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: BT Sports

Post by maverick23 »

mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:12 Khan-Brook couldn't be done, AJ-Wilder couldn't be done, Fury-AJ couldn't be done. Who is the common denominator in this?
The thread was made to understand why BT haven’t announced any shows. Not sure what this has to do with it.
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: BT Sports

Post by dan28uk »

i don't think khan v brook was eddie's fault at all i think he wanted that fight
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: BT Sports

Post by dan28uk »

if you go back last 2/3 years how much boxing has been on sky compared to bt
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BT Sports

Post by mickey1975 »

dan28uk wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:34 i don't think khan v brook was eddie's fault at all i think he wanted that fight
Well they got a deal done in five minutes but Eddie couldn't do it in about 10 years?
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: BT Sports

Post by dan28uk »

khan never wanted that fight , he's just about to retire and thought where can i make the most money....brook
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BT Sports

Post by mickey1975 »

dan28uk wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:52 khan never wanted that fight , he's just about to retire and thought where can i make the most money....brook
Did he tell you? He boxed Canelo!
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: BT Sports

Post by dan28uk »

how long ago was that ! you been drinking this morning ?? been considering it for 2 years and now come out with this a couple of days ago


AMIR KHAN has revealed he will RETIRE after his grudge match with Kell Brook - but vowed to go out on a high. ... He said on Instagram: "I leave it to God to decide which round I knock Kell Brook out. I am going to win the fight 100 per cent. "People ask me what I'm doing after this fight.3 days ago
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: BT Sports

Post by dan28uk »

mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:54
dan28uk wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:52 khan never wanted that fight , he's just about to retire and thought where can i make the most money....brook
Did he tell you? He boxed Canelo!

losing to canelo is a lot better for khan then losing to brook
Manchester Hitman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: BT Sports

Post by Manchester Hitman »

595179 wrote: 15 Jan 2022, 18:57
Manchester Hitman wrote: 15 Jan 2022, 18:26 March 19th - headlined by Dubois and Avanesyan also apparently on the card, and neither have an opponent sorted. I don’t know what’s going on with Warren, but things are looking very iffy at the moment.
It is what it is, he's got a limited budget and limited amount of talent.
Yes, it’s got to be the budget - as he openly says in his interviews, it’s difficult for him to operate shows financially/insurance wise with so much uncertainly.

It certainly isn’t for a lack of talent though mate. He’s got a very big stable - mainly of very promising prospects. It may even be too big, but at least these kids have an opportunity in the sport, especially as many of them may have packed it in during Covid.

The Fury thing must be having an impact on his plans, so hope that gets sorted quickly either way.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23187
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: BT Sports

Post by handsofstone »

mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:09
handsofstone wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 05:58 Someone on twitter said if the DAZN deal with BT goes through then Eddie has to tweet out Frank to "welcome him to the team" :lol:
Has he bought DAZN?
Of course not Michael but it doesn't take a genius to realise where Warren's gonna be in the pecking order if the deal goes through, he'll be happy with WBO European fights at the copperbox
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23187
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: BT Sports

Post by handsofstone »

mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:44
dan28uk wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:34 i don't think khan v brook was eddie's fault at all i think he wanted that fight
Well they got a deal done in five minutes but Eddie couldn't do it in about 10 years?
Because Hearn refused to pay what they were asking for, Sky/Boxxer had no issues coughing up although after how ticket sales went maybe Eddie is regretting that slightly??

As for Fury/Joshua, we all know who shat the bed there and it wasn't Ed/AJ
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23078
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BT Sports

Post by mickey1975 »

handsofstone wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 07:31
mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:44
dan28uk wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:34 i don't think khan v brook was eddie's fault at all i think he wanted that fight
Well they got a deal done in five minutes but Eddie couldn't do it in about 10 years?
Because Hearn refused to pay what they were asking for, Sky/Boxxer had no issues coughing up although after how ticket sales went maybe Eddie is regretting that slightly??

As for Fury/Joshua, we all know who shat the bed there and it wasn't Ed/AJ
Khan says Eddie offered more but he wanted it on a big platform. Who shat the bed? That judge? I might buy into the idea Arum and Fwank wanted to give Hearn the runaround, but I doubt Tyson was shitting himself. It's a very easy fight for him
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: BT Sports

Post by maverick23 »

mickey1975 wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:44
dan28uk wrote: 16 Jan 2022, 06:34 i don't think khan v brook was eddie's fault at all i think he wanted that fight
Well they got a deal done in five minutes but Eddie couldn't do it in about 10 years?
Neither could anyone else. Is it just Eddie’s fault the fight didn’t happen?
Post Reply