Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post Reply
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6084
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by goose 5 »

10 rounds.
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Re: Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

Would be curtains for Urtain.
Vlad
Bantamweight
Posts: 1626
Joined: 15 Feb 2022, 02:15

Re: Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by Vlad »

Foster SD
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Re: Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

Sponsored by Soberano Brandy
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4601
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by scorpio83 »

Bob Foster was successful at light heavyweight not heavyweight and Urtain would batter Foster for the late round knockout win.
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Re: Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

scorpio83 wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 14:04 Bob Foster was successful at light heavyweight not heavyweight and Urtain would batter Foster for the late round knockout win.
Foster beat a number of heavyweights, just not the top ones.
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Re: Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

Joe.Kelly wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 23:15 I think Foster would win by KO. Urtain would be a wide open target for Bob's lethal left-hook.

Normally, I'd be reluctant to pick Foster against a heavyweight. We all know how Bob simply lacked the body mass, sturdiness, and durability to hang in there with any natural heavyweight who outweighed him by 20 lbs or so. However, most of Foster's failures against the bigger guys were to legitimate contenders or guys who were at least top-15 in terms of ability.

Urtain simply wasn't a world-class or even a semi-world class heavyweight. IMO, Urtain was a top-25 heavyweight at best. Really just an incredibly strong club fighter. Nothing more. Therefore I don't think Urtain would have caused much trouble for Foster.

It's possible that Urtain might have lasted 7 or 8 rounds against Foster. I say this only because he did remain on his feet for 9 rounds in losing to Henry Cooper, who had a killer left-hook of his own. However long the fight would last, though, Foster would completely control the action with his sneaky jabs and combinations. At some point, maybe early maybe later, Bob's left-hook would find its mark and Urtain would be lost.
Do some of the Boxrec notes on Urtain's record imply opponents took dives?
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4601
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by scorpio83 »

Joe.Kelly wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 23:15 I think Foster would win by KO. Urtain would be a wide open target for Bob's lethal left-hook.

Normally, I'd be reluctant to pick Foster against a heavyweight. We all know how Bob simply lacked the body mass, sturdiness, and durability to hang in there with any natural heavyweight who outweighed him by 20 lbs or so. However, most of Foster's failures against the bigger guys were to legitimate contenders or guys who were at least top-15 in terms of ability.

Urtain simply wasn't a world-class or even a semi-world class heavyweight. IMO, Urtain was a top-25 heavyweight at best. Really just an incredibly strong club fighter. Nothing more. Therefore I don't think Urtain would have caused much trouble for Foster.

It's possible that Urtain might have lasted 7 or 8 rounds against Foster. I say this only because he did remain on his feet for 9 rounds in losing to Henry Cooper, who had a killer left-hook of his own. However long the fight would last, though, Foster would completely control the action with his sneaky jabs and combinations. At some point, maybe early maybe later, Bob's left-hook would find its mark and Urtain would be lost.
You were right that Bob Foster's failures against the bigger guys were to legitimate contenders, future or former champions like Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier, Ernie Terrell, Zora Folley and Doug Jones. However, I don't agreed with Cutman's opinion because Foster's win against heavyweights weren't top ones, but mostly journeyman or could have been contenders not the ones I mentioned earlier in this paragraph.
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Re: Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

Joe.Kelly wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 23:15
Urtain simply wasn't a world-class or even a semi-world class heavyweight. IMO, Urtain was a top-25 heavyweight at best. Really just an incredibly strong club fighter. Nothing more. Therefore I don't think Urtain would have caused much trouble for Foster.

Fair enough, Scorpio -- but do you agree with the above?
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4601
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Jose Manuel Urtain versus Bob Foster

Post by scorpio83 »

Cutman Scabbers wrote: 16 Feb 2022, 21:07
Joe.Kelly wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 23:15
Urtain simply wasn't a world-class or even a semi-world class heavyweight. IMO, Urtain was a top-25 heavyweight at best. Really just an incredibly strong club fighter. Nothing more. Therefore I don't think Urtain would have caused much trouble for Foster.

Fair enough, Scorpio -- but do you agree with the above?
Good question. Urtain could be capable to wearing Foster down with body shots and stopping him in the late rounds or decision. If Urtain fought Mac Foster, it would be a different story. I agreed with Joe with Urtain being top 25 heavyweight at best, but I would think Urtain would have caused much, but not more trouble for Foster like Frazier did, who easily blasted Foster out in 2 rounds with his big left hook in his world heavyweight title defense.
Post Reply