Ryder would be a good fight for Andrade.
Andrade vs Benividez
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
They wait Andrade to get old and fading, then fight him. Munguia should;ve fought Andrade for the wbo mw title.
Ryder would be a good fight for Andrade.
Ryder would be a good fight for Andrade.
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05No one corroborated those sums you cited.Bandog wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 09:42I guess it's about money, when you want it to be. Even guys in house won't fight him.apollo creed wrote: ↑18 Feb 2022, 17:30 Why doesn't Charlo and Bena try to get Andrade? Hearn did his job but he can't force fighters to fight Andrade.
At the end of the day Andrade is making good money on DAZN. Andrade should fight Jacobs and Ryder.![]()
Charlo rejected $7 million for a one-fight deal and a chance to win another belt.
Canelo rejected $45 million for a one-fight deal.
Golovkin rejected a $25 million offer to unify at 160 out of fear of ruining a third Canelo fight.
Billy Joe Saunders tested positive for PEDs and was not interested in rescheduling.
Jaime Munguia didn’t even want to start any negotiations or activate his mandatory status.
And now Benavidez is clearly pricing himself out.
You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.
https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
EO exposed!Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05No one corroborated those sums you cited.Bandog wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 09:42
I guess it's about money, when you want it to be. Even guys in house won't fight him.
Charlo rejected $7 million for a one-fight deal and a chance to win another belt.
Canelo rejected $45 million for a one-fight deal.
Golovkin rejected a $25 million offer to unify at 160 out of fear of ruining a third Canelo fight.
Billy Joe Saunders tested positive for PEDs and was not interested in rescheduling.
Jaime Munguia didn’t even want to start any negotiations or activate his mandatory status.
And now Benavidez is clearly pricing himself out.
You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.
https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05No one corroborated those sums you cited.Bandog wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 09:42
I guess it's about money, when you want it to be. Even guys in house won't fight him.
Charlo rejected $7 million for a one-fight deal and a chance to win another belt.
Canelo rejected $45 million for a one-fight deal.
Golovkin rejected a $25 million offer to unify at 160 out of fear of ruining a third Canelo fight.
Billy Joe Saunders tested positive for PEDs and was not interested in rescheduling.
Jaime Munguia didn’t even want to start any negotiations or activate his mandatory status.
And now Benavidez is clearly pricing himself out.
You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.
https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/
My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.
I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).
Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Shut down by EO!Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05
No one corroborated those sums you cited.
You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.
https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/
My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.
I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).
Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:57Shut down by EO!Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35
Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.
https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/
My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.
I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).
Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?![]()
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Article notes: "By Mohamed Horomtallah: Sampson Lewkowicz, David Benavidez’s promoter, stated".."Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:00oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:57Shut down by EO!Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53
The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).
My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.
I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).
Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?![]()
![]()
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Who is Mohamed Horomtallah?
And can you please provide the verbatim quote of Sampson Lewkowicz's actual words from that article supporting the following claims?
Last edited by Enlightened-One on 20 Feb 2022, 12:33, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Read it yourself EO. You said there was no author...there was...There is nothing to posted in this thread proving those quoted points aren't true. SO you go enjoy being irrefutable.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:27Who is Mohamed Horomtallah?
And can you please provide the verbatim quote of Sampson Lewkowicz's actual words from that article?
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Oh, and by the way, Mohamed Horomtallah is a contributor with the boxingnews24.com among others. Many articles, etc.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
You didn't even read it, did you?
If you could read, then you'd realise I never said that.
So are you saying that anyone can lie and claim whatever they damn well wanted... And it has to be considered as being "fact" regardless of there being no evidence whatsoever to justify their claims?
I believe pigs can fly!
And "there is nothing to posted in this thread" that undermines my claim!!!
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Who are the "among others" websites (and I mean those that don't simply provide a hyperlink back to boxingnews24.com)?
How many twitter followers does he have? By the looks of things, Mohamed Horomtallah only has four.
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Um, there's that oh wise one.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05
No one corroborated those sums you cited.
You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.
https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/
My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.
I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).
Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Anonymous also means not known to the public or an unremarkable person.oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:10Um, there's that oh wise one.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35
Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.
https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/
My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.
I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).
Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?
You'd never heard of Mohamed Horomtallah until this discussion.
He only has four Twitter followers.
English isn’t even my first language but I seem to have a better grasp of it than you do!
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Typical EO. It doesn't exist unless you know about it. Classic.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:16Anonymous also means not known to the public or an unremarkable person.oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:10Um, there's that oh wise one.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53
The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).
My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.
I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).
Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?
You'd never heard of Mohamed Horomtallah until this discussion.
He only has four Twitter followers.
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
I've never met anyone before who can't accept being wrong, who is wrong 99% of the time! 
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
EO loves dragging posters in his ocd traps. lol

He's like a biatch who loves teasing the sh.it out of guys. lol
He's like a biatch who loves teasing the sh.it out of guys. lol
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
apollo creed wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:40 EO loves dragging posters in his ocd traps. lol![]()
He's like a biatch who loves teasing the sh.it out of guys. lol
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
You might need to furnish yourself with a proper dictionary if you think that’s what anonymous also means.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:16Anonymous also means not known to the public or an unremarkable person.oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:10Um, there's that oh wise one.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53
The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).
My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.
I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).
Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?
You'd never heard of Mohamed Horomtallah until this discussion.
He only has four Twitter followers.
English isn’t even my first language but I seem to have a better grasp of it than you do!
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Nah, he's just moving the goal posts and changing the rules as always. Let him have his fun. We don't want him to have a breakdown.maverick23 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 15:22You might need to furnish yourself with a proper dictionary if you think that’s what anonymous also means.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:16Anonymous also means not known to the public or an unremarkable person.
You'd never heard of Mohamed Horomtallah until this discussion.
He only has four Twitter followers.
English isn’t even my first language but I seem to have a better grasp of it than you do!![]()
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
You guys may choose to attempt to prove me “wrong” by citing your “opinions”, but nothing you’ll claim will 100% reliably reflect reality.oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 15:29Nah, he's just moving the goal posts and changing the rules as always. Let him have his fun. We don't want him to have a breakdown.maverick23 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 15:22You might need to furnish yourself with a proper dictionary if you think that’s what anonymous also means.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:16
Anonymous also means not known to the public or an unremarkable person.
You'd never heard of Mohamed Horomtallah until this discussion.
He only has four Twitter followers.
English isn’t even my first language but I seem to have a better grasp of it than you do!![]()
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39230
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
tbf , boxingnews24 is a terrible website and that's been said for years, way before this thread. ive gotten after ruthy before for posting their stuff. its mostly a few guys using fake author names to publish bait pieces meant to trigger responses due to how stupid they are
home to the legendary scott gilfoid
here's some quotes that sum it up well viewtopic.php?f=9&t=138833&p=2920042&hilit=
home to the legendary scott gilfoid
here's some quotes that sum it up well viewtopic.php?f=9&t=138833&p=2920042&hilit=
Boxingnews24 is one of the worst sites out there. Steer clear of it at all costs. It's not journalism; it's people with sub-100 IQs ranting bias-laden tripe.
Boxingnews24 is the equivelant of a bug eyed drunk sitting in the corner of a pub, writing his "thoughts" on the back of a beer mat.
or some comments from reddittBoxing News 24 is terrible. Agree it's just sensationalist crap to draw people in, get the comments flowing and make advertising revenue. A 'trash site' if you will for boxing, can;t stand it myself but each to their own.
and a thread on BS https://www.BS.com/forums/boxi ... 4?t=581631In serious form, boxingnews24 is a joke. Their site is filled with random authors, and their standard authors are a joke as if they were selected personality arch types.
One is a Mayweather fan who says Pacquiao would get iced by Brandon Rios, the other is a Pacquiao fan who predicted Guerrero would destroy Mayweather.
Then there's a guy which is practically British Boxers > The World. The other is a Wilder fan boy, one is a Klitschko lover and the other a hater. Overall a joke of a site with no integrity what so ever.
assorted other commentsAll of the writers on there are actually Eddy Pronishev and David Rosenberg of ESB. They even changed ESB to look exactly like their other site. They even started writing the same articles, almost word for word, under a variety of fake names on ESB like Michael Collins.
Gilfoid, Williams, Mckay, Ambrose are all one and the same. They fabricate quotes, create fake news and even post material that is months old. I saw something they posted last week from David Price, using quotes from September of last year and passing it off as new.
Gave up reading articles on that site many years ago. Shambles
They post so much tripe, I unfollowed them a while back.
Stopped reading this sites shit years ago
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
100% agree with you.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 21:17 tbf , boxingnews24 is a terrible website and that's been said for years, way before this thread. ive gotten after ruthy before for posting their stuff. its mostly a few guys using fake author names to publish bait pieces meant to trigger responses due to how stupid they are
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Feb 2022, 04:37100% agree with you.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 21:17 tbf , boxingnews24 is a terrible website and that's been said for years, way before this thread. ive gotten after ruthy before for posting their stuff. its mostly a few guys using fake author names to publish bait pieces meant to trigger responses due to how stupid they are![]()
Birds of a feather....
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39230
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Andrade vs Benividez
ya, and all those other people, for years and years, also agreed, simply because they hate boo boo 