I'm the one who has defined repeatedly what padded means, and you're the one who keeps refusing to. Speaks volumes.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑10 Mar 2022, 19:34Stop whining.Lackeos wrote: ↑10 Mar 2022, 19:07First of all, this entire post is idiotic. Second, how about you define what a padded resume is, why it's called padded, and relate it to the broader definition of the word padded. Because I've already done that like five times. Whereas, you haven't yet; you just continue using a word in a way that doesn't fit its meaning.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑09 Mar 2022, 11:54
Why did you cherry-pick one particular sentence and exclude all the other pertinent points I discussed in my original post you've only partially-quoted?
Did I explain some inconvenient facts that you cannot address? Are you unwilling to engage in honest debate?
As a reminder, here's what I asked you:
• The 34-year-old Meng Fanlong has been competing in the paid ranks for seven years and two months, which notable names has he defeated?
And you have just admitted that Meng Fanlong hasn’t faced any notable names during the entirety of his seven years and two months professional career!
For the record, Meng Fanlong isn’t the only unbeaten fighter that’s been competing in the paid ranks for more than four years that haven’t faced any credible opponents, meaning they too have padded resumes.
Therefore, it’s pointless you mentioning their names as a weak attempt to support your stance, because I apply my standards consistently.
Put it this way, if two people have diarrhoea, then they both have diarrhoea, regardless the varying degrees of severity!!!
End of discussion.
All you keep doing is randomly barking the phrases “you’re wrong… and you’re an idiot”, but that’s not a valid counter-argument for all the facts I’ve cited that you’ve flatly-refused to directly address.
If I'm not making arguments, and you are, then how come I've defined padded and you haven't? Oh, that's right, it's because you can't remember all the times I've schooled you about what padding means, because you're incapable of allowing absorbing information.how about you define what a padded resume is, why it's called padded, and relate it to the broader definition of the word padded. Because I've already done that like five times. Whereas, you haven't yet; you just continue using a word in a way that doesn't fit its meaning.
And by the way, you've never made any points, nor am I leaving out points that you've made. All you've done is say, essentially that if a person isn't muscular, then they must be fat, ignoring the fact that they might also be skinny; that is the flaw in your argument. A padded resume is a fattened resume. You keep saying if Fanlong has been around a while without accomplishing much, then his record is padded. That's not a point, that's just stating a lie and thinking it's a point. I've already explained that the fewer easy wins a fighter has accrued in 7 years, the less padded his resume is, but, again, you're incapable of processing that fact. If he had MORE easy wins within a period of time, then his resume would be padded. All you do is put up an information wall and disallow anything from getting in.
Honestly, I know that you're the most autistic person on this forum, but you're acting like you're a troll and that your trolling technique is to pretend that you can't learn information even after it's been told to you 10, 20, or 100 times. We're like 20 posts deep into this argument, and a) no matter how many times I knock down your claims, you claim that I haven't addressed them and b) you still haven't responded logically to literally anything I've said since the beginning. With every reply, you're like "Okay, I'm going to ignore all of that and circle right back to square one. With each subsequent post, I'm not going to do anything to build an argument. I'm not going to define anything. I'm just going to keep making false statements, sprinkled occasionally with true statements that don't support my point."
It's like you want to insult Meng's resume, so you're just using any derogatory term you've heard before, whether it applies or not. And you'll defend to the death your right to keep grossly misusing terms. The fact is, "padded resume" means EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of how you're using it. And if you used ACCURATE criticisms of Meng's resume, this could've been over four pages ago.
And, in case you completely lack self awareness like severely autistic people do, everyone on here knows that you will argue for literally an unlimited number of pages to avoid admitting when you're obviously wrong. You're the only one who doesn't see what a weirdo you are for it.
