George Foreman Denies Sexual Assault Allegations In Forthcoming Lawsuit,

[gilgamesh]

The trivialising of sexual assault on this thread is absolutely sickening.

Before you start spouting off, realize that many people have their lives and careers ruined by dishonest people with accusations like this. Real cases of sexual assault are no joke, and it goes both ways with males and females. When you talk about 30+ year bullshit? You need to just stfu, in my opinion.

RIGHT. This guy gets it ^

[Lenny Cravats]

The trivialising of sexual assault on this thread is absolutely sickening.

Before you start spouting off, realize that many people have their lives and careers ruined by dishonest people with accusations like this. Real cases of sexual assault are no joke, and it goes both ways with males and females. When you talk about 30+ year bullshit? You need to just stfu, in my opinion.

RIGHT. This guy gets it ^

Does he fvck. Like I have said. My wife was sexually abused 30 years ago. She may, one day, take the guy to court.

You guys have no fornicating clue what you're talking about. None.

[1057230]

some victim's are literally not capable of saying a word to anyone about what have been done to them. for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 years...

some just won't talk about it ever and take it to their grave.

out of GUILT, SHAME & FEAR FOR THEIR FVCKIN LIFE the abuse literally becomes THE UNSPEAKABLE.

the time passed until someone decides to finally speak about it, is zero indication about shit! just isn't.

it's also a fact that people lie and make up abuse claims out of thin air about consensual encounters they had decades ago to simply extort money.

[apollo creed]

What was George Foreman net worth in 2021?
George Foreman is a retired American boxer and highly successful entrepreneur who has a net worth of $300 million.

Those leechers want a big money grab. I hope Foreman sues the schit out of them and ask a big sum of money.

[Bandog]

some victim's are literally not capable of saying a word to anyone about what have been done to them. for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 years...

some just won't talk about it ever and take it to their grave.

out of GUILT, SHAME & FEAR FOR THEIR FVCKIN LIFE the abuse literally becomes THE UNSPEAKABLE.

the time passed until someone decides to finally speak about it, is zero indication about shit! just isn't.

it's also a fact that people lie and make up abuse claims out of thin air about consensual encounters they had decades ago to simply extort money.

This is what I am talking about. No one is trying to make light of or trivialize the crime. The fact that someone waits 30 years to bring a crime to court doesn't mean it isn't legit, it just means the likelihood of a conviction is very slim. To me it is more of a gesture to tarnish someone's name, or a money grab, or both.
Imagine if you are a judge - you have to convict all crimes brought up from 30 yrs ago, not just cases of rape. There are many kinds of abuse, assaults, etc. They do it for murders when they have DNA evidence.

Probably not a can of worms we want to open....in the US at least. Our justice systems and politics are not the envy of the world. More like a laughing stock.

[gilgamesh]

Before you start spouting off, realize that many people have their lives and careers ruined by dishonest people with accusations like this. Real cases of sexual assault are no joke, and it goes both ways with males and females. When you talk about 30+ year bullshit? You need to just stfu, in my opinion.

RIGHT. This guy gets it ^

Does he fvck. Like I have said. My wife was sexually abused 30 years ago. She may, one day, take the guy to court.

You guys have no fornicating clue what you're talking about. None.

Justice is the right thing regardless Lenny.

If someone was Sexually abused. Do they deserve justice? Of course

If someone is falsely accused of such a thing? Do they deserve justice? Of course they do.

The one that was abused sees their window for justice close the more time passes from the abuse.

The one that's falsely accused in today's era will likely be dragged through the mud, and called everything you can imagine by SJW's regardless of whether he did anything or not.

It's not fair either way.

[Enlightened-One]

Just to add some context to the conversation…

The name of the accused is usually disclosed to the public.

The name of the alleged victim(s) is usually withheld.

A falsely accused person can still suffer significant losses, even when their name is eventually cleared of committing any wrongdoing.

Two women spent more than six months issuing threats to George Foreman, demanding he either pay them a combined total of $25m or they’d file a civil lawsuit against him claiming he’d sexually abused them almost half a century ago (i.e. "more than 45 years ago").

Surely they can only possess “he-said-she-said” type evidence?

George Foreman refused to be extorted and stated he would rather pay hefty legal fees and tarnish his own reputation, resorting to making these allegations public himself, because he wants to fight these accusations in court.

More than six days have transpired since George Foreman publicly announced he was facing a sexual abuse lawsuit, but the women haven’t delivered on their threats yet.

The reason why I feel this is an attempted money grab, is because the alleged victims should have tried to punish George straight away by filing the lawsuit immediately, rather than spending six months trying to receive a $25m payoff in order to keep quiet.

And these women still haven’t filed their lawsuit yet, which makes me wonder what they’re waiting for?

Are they backing off because their attempted extortion has failed? I don’t really know, but I guess we’ll find out within the next week or so.

[apollo creed]

Just to add some context to the conversation…

The name of the accused is usually disclosed to the public.

The name of the alleged victim(s) is usually withheld.

A falsely accused person can still suffer significant losses, even when their name is eventually cleared of committing any wrongdoing.

Two women spent more than six months issuing threats to George Foreman, demanding he either pay them a combined total of $25m or they’d file a civil lawsuit against him claiming he’d sexually abused them almost half a century ago (i.e. "more than 45 years ago").

Surely they can only possess “he-said-she-said” type evidence?

George Foreman refused to be extorted and stated he would rather pay hefty legal fees and tarnish his own reputation, resorting to making these allegations public himself, because he wants to fight these accusations in court.

More than six days have transpired since George Foreman publicly announced he was facing a sexual abuse lawsuit, but the women haven’t delivered on their threats yet.

The reason why I feel this is an attempted money grab, is because the alleged victims should have tried to punish George straight away by filing the lawsuit immediately, rather than spending six months trying to receive a $25m payoff in order to keep quiet.

And these women still haven’t filed their lawsuit yet, which makes me wonder what they’re waiting for?

Are they backing off because their attempted extortion has failed? I don’t really know, but I guess we’ll find out within the next week or so.

#BelieveAllWomen #MeToo #Woke #TheLawFavoursTheAllegedVictim #MediaAssumesGuiltBasedOnTheNoSmokeWithoutFirePrinciple #RuinedReputationDespiteInnocence

[Enlightened-One]

Just to add some context to the conversation…

The name of the accused is usually disclosed to the public.

The name of the alleged victim(s) is usually withheld.

A falsely accused person can still suffer significant losses, even when their name is eventually cleared of committing any wrongdoing.

Two women spent more than six months issuing threats to George Foreman, demanding he either pay them a combined total of $25m or they’d file a civil lawsuit against him claiming he’d sexually abused them almost half a century ago (i.e. "more than 45 years ago").

Surely they can only possess “he-said-she-said” type evidence?

George Foreman refused to be extorted and stated he would rather pay hefty legal fees and tarnish his own reputation, resorting to making these allegations public himself, because he wants to fight these accusations in court.

More than six days have transpired since George Foreman publicly announced he was facing a sexual abuse lawsuit, but the women haven’t delivered on their threats yet.

The reason why I feel this is an attempted money grab, is because the alleged victims should have tried to punish George straight away by filing the lawsuit immediately, rather than spending six months trying to receive a $25m payoff in order to keep quiet.

And these women still haven’t filed their lawsuit yet, which makes me wonder what they’re waiting for?

Are they backing off because their attempted extortion has failed? I don’t really know, but I guess we’ll find out within the next week or so.

#BelieveAllWomen #MeToo #Woke #TheLawFavoursTheAllegedVictim #MediaAssumesGuiltBasedOnTheNoSmokeWithoutFirePrinciple #RuinedReputationDespiteInnocence

The first two hashtags I quoted were intended to reflect "movements" orchestrated by the left, which ultimately became the media's automatic/default stance... to assume that men are always guilty.

We saw that recently with the Depp-Heard case, most of the mainstream media continued portraying Amber as the "victim", even though social media users believed otherwise.

There's no hypocrisy on my part. My stance on the George Foreman sexual abuse issue has not changed one iota.

[Thomastearns]

Amazing how you fellows can't even consider the possibility that he is guilty. I for one think that he is. It sounds like these women were underage when George used his friendship with their fathers to gain access to them. That's pretty low really to use weak men to access their underage daughters. How underage were they? Older than 15 I hope. I've never bought into this darling act from George, you can see that he is a phony a mile away. Hope he gets exposed for what he really is.

It could be true, any guy who calls all his kids George is a fcuking wrong un, no doubt, however why wait 45 years?

I'm not a woke fellow by any means but lets look at a timeline for a 15 year old girl who has just been sexually used by a 28 year old man and lets keep in mind that George could be innocent so this is just a random case but could also apply to him.

First 6 months. "He is my boyfriend, he is going to take care of me etc thoughts."
Months 6-12. I need to move on and have my own life.
2nd-4th year. My father wouldn't want me to rat on his friend, I don't want to disappoint my dad.
6-8th. Its been so long, who would believe me. How would this effect my reputation.
8 years have past and person is now 23 years old.
8th-18th. This will bring shame on me and my kids and spouse etc, better not to say anything.
Person is now 33 years old.
18th and onwards. This will damage my reputation in my workplace. "The whore that big George used" Who will believe me now 18 years after the fact.
45th year. Speaking about sexual abuse has become more socially acceptable and my kids now have their own lives. I am well settled in my job and don't have to worry about any consequences of coming forward. What the man did was wrong and he should acknowledge that and suffer the consequences of his actions.

So while it is possible that this is some woman who had a legitimate one night stand at the age of 19 with George only to get pumped and dumped and is now making noise because of something that was her own fault. It's also possible that George truly did something wrong and that the reason for waiting 45 years to bring it to light are legitimate.

Taking a stand one way or the other is a bit stupid because we don't yet know what the allegations are and we certainly don't know anything about their validity.

And then there is a bigger question of age, if we were to explore our family trees thousands of years back then we would find in it that we all come from mothers we weren't more than 12 or 13 years old. In some times and in some parts of the world people have acquired maturity at earlier ages than now and it has been socially acceptable for younger people to be in relationships with older people. It is impossible to say even if a 15 year old entered into a relationship with George 45 years ago how wrong or how justifiable that was, only they know what was in their heads but if the older party only left fond memories with the younger one then it would be strange for complaints to surface.

I recently did however see a documentary on youtube showing a 73 year old man having a relationship with a 16 year old filipina woman and sure that doesn't sound ideal but even though humans made laws that say that this 16 year old isn't a woman, nature gave her puberty much earlier than that and with the harsh conditions that she was facing there in her life, did this 73 year old fellow really make her life worse somehow?

Them's just the facts of life.

Poverty stinks, and that girl and her family had to make that choice. Was it love, or was it the money?

Whatever it was, the 73, we assume had to follow the laws of the girls home country.

It may not feel right, but the laws the law.


However in Foreman's case we don't know the full extent of the charges being brought against him but we do know that sexual assault has been claimed.

What makes this particular case so reprehensible is the allegation that they tried to secretly exhort $25 million.

I can't see how that in itself is not a crime.

Perhaps if they'd asked for $2.5 million big George might have paid them off to avoid the hassle.


All of this sordid speculation kind of reminds me of that old joke:

A man asks a woman if she would be willing to sleep with him if he pays her an exorbitant sum.

She replies affirmatively.

He then names a paltry amount and asks if she would still be willing to sleep with him for the revised fee.

The woman is greatly offended and replies as follows:

She: What kind of woman do you think I am?

He: We’ve already established that. Now we’re just haggling over the price.

[Bandog]

So, they have DNA evidence? Which George Foreman was it? They could all sue for slander to their name...didn't he name all of his kids George?

Pretty dumb thread tbh, may bring up if actual charges are filed?

[emallini]

Big George is innocent

[apollo creed]

I could imagine EO wishing deep inside him being sexual assaulted for real, just to have some fun in his life.

[H8Usernames]

It could be true, any guy who calls all his kids George is a fcuking wrong un, no doubt, however why wait 45 years?

I'm not a woke fellow by any means but lets look at a timeline for a 15 year old girl who has just been sexually used by a 28 year old man and lets keep in mind that George could be innocent so this is just a random case but could also apply to him.

First 6 months. "He is my boyfriend, he is going to take care of me etc thoughts."
Months 6-12. I need to move on and have my own life.
2nd-4th year. My father wouldn't want me to rat on his friend, I don't want to disappoint my dad.
6-8th. Its been so long, who would believe me. How would this effect my reputation.
8 years have past and person is now 23 years old.
8th-18th. This will bring shame on me and my kids and spouse etc, better not to say anything.
Person is now 33 years old.
18th and onwards. This will damage my reputation in my workplace. "The whore that big George used" Who will believe me now 18 years after the fact.
45th year. Speaking about sexual abuse has become more socially acceptable and my kids now have their own lives. I am well settled in my job and don't have to worry about any consequences of coming forward. What the man did was wrong and he should acknowledge that and suffer the consequences of his actions.

So while it is possible that this is some woman who had a legitimate one night stand at the age of 19 with George only to get pumped and dumped and is now making noise because of something that was her own fault. It's also possible that George truly did something wrong and that the reason for waiting 45 years to bring it to light are legitimate.

Taking a stand one way or the other is a bit stupid because we don't yet know what the allegations are and we certainly don't know anything about their validity.

And then there is a bigger question of age, if we were to explore our family trees thousands of years back then we would find in it that we all come from mothers we weren't more than 12 or 13 years old. In some times and in some parts of the world people have acquired maturity at earlier ages than now and it has been socially acceptable for younger people to be in relationships with older people. It is impossible to say even if a 15 year old entered into a relationship with George 45 years ago how wrong or how justifiable that was, only they know what was in their heads but if the older party only left fond memories with the younger one then it would be strange for complaints to surface.

I recently did however see a documentary on youtube showing a 73 year old man having a relationship with a 16 year old filipina woman and sure that doesn't sound ideal but even though humans made laws that say that this 16 year old isn't a woman, nature gave her puberty much earlier than that and with the harsh conditions that she was facing there in her life, did this 73 year old fellow really make her life worse somehow?

Them's just the facts of life.

Poverty stinks, and that girl and her family had to make that choice. Was it love, or was it the money?

Whatever it was, the 73, we assume had to follow the laws of the girls home country.

It may not feel right, but the laws the law.


However in Foreman's case we don't know the full extent of the charges being brought against him but we do know that sexual assault has been claimed.

What makes this particular case so reprehensible is the allegation that they tried to secretly exhort $25 million.

I can't see how that in itself is not a crime.

Perhaps if they'd asked for $2.5 million big George might have paid them off to avoid the hassle.


All of this sordid speculation kind of reminds me of that old joke:

A man asks a woman if she would be willing to sleep with him if he pays her an exorbitant sum.

She replies affirmatively.

He then names a paltry amount and asks if she would still be willing to sleep with him for the revised fee.

The woman is greatly offended and replies as follows:

She: What kind of woman do you think I am?

He: We’ve already established that. Now we’re just haggling over the price.

The 73 year old broke those laws blatantly and without punishment. Therefore he did not have to follow those laws did he? And the law really isn't the law.

Asking for a higher amount than one is ready to accept is a well known negotiation tactic, it doesn't make you a whore but if so then I would have to admit to being one myself.

You have to sympathize with stars that commit sexual misconduct however. They have all these women spreading their legs for them all the time all over the place, being exposed to that must mess with their ideas about normal behavior and acceptable conduct.

[Lenny Cravats]

I'm not a woke fellow by any means but lets look at a timeline for a 15 year old girl who has just been sexually used by a 28 year old man and lets keep in mind that George could be innocent so this is just a random case but could also apply to him.

First 6 months. "He is my boyfriend, he is going to take care of me etc thoughts."
Months 6-12. I need to move on and have my own life.
2nd-4th year. My father wouldn't want me to rat on his friend, I don't want to disappoint my dad.
6-8th. Its been so long, who would believe me. How would this effect my reputation.
8 years have past and person is now 23 years old.
8th-18th. This will bring shame on me and my kids and spouse etc, better not to say anything.
Person is now 33 years old.
18th and onwards. This will damage my reputation in my workplace. "The whore that big George used" Who will believe me now 18 years after the fact.
45th year. Speaking about sexual abuse has become more socially acceptable and my kids now have their own lives. I am well settled in my job and don't have to worry about any consequences of coming forward. What the man did was wrong and he should acknowledge that and suffer the consequences of his actions.

So while it is possible that this is some woman who had a legitimate one night stand at the age of 19 with George only to get pumped and dumped and is now making noise because of something that was her own fault. It's also possible that George truly did something wrong and that the reason for waiting 45 years to bring it to light are legitimate.

Taking a stand one way or the other is a bit stupid because we don't yet know what the allegations are and we certainly don't know anything about their validity.

And then there is a bigger question of age, if we were to explore our family trees thousands of years back then we would find in it that we all come from mothers we weren't more than 12 or 13 years old. In some times and in some parts of the world people have acquired maturity at earlier ages than now and it has been socially acceptable for younger people to be in relationships with older people. It is impossible to say even if a 15 year old entered into a relationship with George 45 years ago how wrong or how justifiable that was, only they know what was in their heads but if the older party only left fond memories with the younger one then it would be strange for complaints to surface.

I recently did however see a documentary on youtube showing a 73 year old man having a relationship with a 16 year old filipina woman and sure that doesn't sound ideal but even though humans made laws that say that this 16 year old isn't a woman, nature gave her puberty much earlier than that and with the harsh conditions that she was facing there in her life, did this 73 year old fellow really make her life worse somehow?

Them's just the facts of life.

Poverty stinks, and that girl and her family had to make that choice. Was it love, or was it the money?

Whatever it was, the 73, we assume had to follow the laws of the girls home country.

It may not feel right, but the laws the law.


However in Foreman's case we don't know the full extent of the charges being brought against him but we do know that sexual assault has been claimed.

What makes this particular case so reprehensible is the allegation that they tried to secretly exhort $25 million.

I can't see how that in itself is not a crime.

Perhaps if they'd asked for $2.5 million big George might have paid them off to avoid the hassle.


All of this sordid speculation kind of reminds me of that old joke:

A man asks a woman if she would be willing to sleep with him if he pays her an exorbitant sum.

She replies affirmatively.

He then names a paltry amount and asks if she would still be willing to sleep with him for the revised fee.

The woman is greatly offended and replies as follows:

She: What kind of woman do you think I am?

He: We’ve already established that. Now we’re just haggling over the price.

The 73 year old broke those laws blatantly and without punishment. Therefore he did not have to follow those laws did he? And the law really isn't the law.

Asking for a higher amount than one is ready to accept is a well known negotiation tactic, it doesn't make you a whore but if so then I would have to admit to being one myself.

You have to sympathize with stars that commit sexual misconduct however. They have all these women spreading their legs for them all the time all over the place, being exposed to that must mess with their ideas about normal behavior and acceptable conduct.

Don't fvck kids, always ask for consent.
Doesn't seem that hard, really.

[1057230]

if I'd want to fvck a little kid, I'd send me into the next life. period.

[H8Usernames]

Them's just the facts of life.

Poverty stinks, and that girl and her family had to make that choice. Was it love, or was it the money?

Whatever it was, the 73, we assume had to follow the laws of the girls home country.

It may not feel right, but the laws the law.


However in Foreman's case we don't know the full extent of the charges being brought against him but we do know that sexual assault has been claimed.

What makes this particular case so reprehensible is the allegation that they tried to secretly exhort $25 million.

I can't see how that in itself is not a crime.

Perhaps if they'd asked for $2.5 million big George might have paid them off to avoid the hassle.


All of this sordid speculation kind of reminds me of that old joke:

A man asks a woman if she would be willing to sleep with him if he pays her an exorbitant sum.

She replies affirmatively.

He then names a paltry amount and asks if she would still be willing to sleep with him for the revised fee.

The woman is greatly offended and replies as follows:

She: What kind of woman do you think I am?

He: We’ve already established that. Now we’re just haggling over the price.

The 73 year old broke those laws blatantly and without punishment. Therefore he did not have to follow those laws did he? And the law really isn't the law.

Asking for a higher amount than one is ready to accept is a well known negotiation tactic, it doesn't make you a whore but if so then I would have to admit to being one myself.

You have to sympathize with stars that commit sexual misconduct however. They have all these women spreading their legs for them all the time all over the place, being exposed to that must mess with their ideas about normal behavior and acceptable conduct.

Don't fvck kids, always ask for consent.
Doesn't seem that hard, really.

Yeap, seems really easy. What if you start communicating with a woman who says that she is 19 but tells you she is 17 and a half after you have taken her to bed a few times? Do you then become the scum of the earth?

This asking for consent thing, sounds like you really need to bring a written contract to the date. Some women will press those charges when they develope a bad conscience because they just cheated on their boyfriend and ofcourse it's sometimes easier to just tell yourself that you are a rape victim instead of a cheater. If a woman acts interested in your sexual advances then that should be enough really.

[H8Usernames]

if I'd want to fvck a little kid, I'd send me into the next life. period.

That would be the best solution really.

[Lenny Cravats]

The 73 year old broke those laws blatantly and without punishment. Therefore he did not have to follow those laws did he? And the law really isn't the law.

Asking for a higher amount than one is ready to accept is a well known negotiation tactic, it doesn't make you a whore but if so then I would have to admit to being one myself.

You have to sympathize with stars that commit sexual misconduct however. They have all these women spreading their legs for them all the time all over the place, being exposed to that must mess with their ideas about normal behavior and acceptable conduct.

Don't fvck kids, always ask for consent.
Doesn't seem that hard, really.

Yeap, seems really easy. What if you start communicating with a woman who says that she is 19 but tells you she is 17 and a half after you have taken her to bed a few times? Do you then become the scum of the earth?

This asking for consent thing, sounds like you really need to bring a written contract to the date. Some women will press those charges when they develope a bad conscience because they just cheated on their boyfriend and ofcourse it's sometimes easier to just tell yourself that you are a rape victim instead of a cheater. If a woman acts interested in your sexual advances then that should be enough really.

Obviously not.

Though this is what I mean about corroborating evidence - which some people here just don't seem to understand.
If the cops interview someone and they say that the sex was consensual and they believed them to be 18, but then this blokes mates remember him saying she was 15 and people remember the guy picking them up from school etc, etc, then it starts to paint a picture.
What happens then, often, is that more people who were underage then say the same thing, each story corroborated by other individuals.

[Enlightened-One]

Almost four weeks have passed since George Foreman announced the sexual assault allegations against him and the alleged victims haven’t filed the lawsuit yet, despite them seeking an out-of-court settlement seven months ago.

[Ruthless-RKO]

George Foreman Accused of Raping 2 Women during the 1970s in New Lawsuits

Boxing legend George Foreman has been accused of rape by two women in separate lawsuits filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court and obtained by TheWrap.

The women, who claim the assaults happened in the 1970s when they were children, said their fathers worked with Foremen and that during that period Foreman groomed them prior to the alleged assults. The women each seek over $25 million. Their identities have not been disclosed and they’re referred to by the pseudonyms Gwen H. and Denise S in the filings. The women are now in their 60s, according to the filings.

Foreman has firmly denied the accusations, which the boxer says are attempts to extort him.

“Over the past six months, two women have been trying to extort millions of dollars each from me and my family,” he said in a statement obtained by TheWrap. “They are falsely claiming that I sexually abused them over 45 years ago in the 1970s. I adamantly and categorically deny these allegations. The pride I take in my reputation means as much to me as my sports accomplishments, and I will not be intimidated by baseless threats and lies. I am, and always will be, guided by my faith and trust in God. I will work with my lawyers to fully and truthfully expose my accusers’ scheme and defend myself in court. I don’t pick fights, but I don’t run away from them either.”

An amendment to California’s statute of limitations passed in 2020 has given victims of childhood sexual assault more time to sue, allowing suit within five years of discovering an injury resulting from the assault.

The women suing Foreman claim “physical and mental pain and suffering” which they say they realized at an unspecified date. Their lawsuits were brought under pseudonyms. Foreman is listed as a Doe defendant, but he is identified as a former professional heavyweight boxer who went professional in 1969 and defeated Joe Frazier for the heavyweight championship in 1973.

One woman from Los Angeles County, Denise S. said she met Foreman at 8 years old and was groomed by him for the next few years.

“When Plaintiff was 13 years old, Doe called Plaintiff at her home in Hayward, California and asked Plaintiff if she knew how to masturbate,” states the complaint. “During the call, Doe gave plaintiff instructions on how to masturbate herself.”

According to the suit, Foreman then raped her multiple times in 1976.

The other woman, Nevada resident Gwen H., said Foreman invited her to his apartment when she was 15 after she had met him years earlier in Philadelphia.

“DOE threatened that if she didn’t comply, her dad would lose his job,” the complaint states. “DOE then instructed Plaintiff to remove her clothes. Feeling the duress and coercion of this threat, Plaintiff complied with DOE’s commands.”

Foreman raped her multiple times until she was 16, according to her suit.

The complaints allege sexual battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Foreman is represented by Shawn Holley and Suann MacIsaac of Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump Holley.

[apollo creed]

Its very known that teenage girls are very curious and eager to "play" with men. Some of them are desperate to get sex and become women. It is what it is.

[joshj909]

Its very known that teenage girls are very curious and eager to "play" with men. Some of them are desperate to get sex and become women. It is what it is.

Nonce alert

[apollo creed]

Its very known that teenage girls are very curious and eager to "play" with men. Some of them are desperate to get sex and become women. It is what it is.

Nonce alert

Is that you EO? I knew it! Its so easy.

Hey EO, how many clones do you have on this forum?

[joshj909]

Its very known that teenage girls are very curious and eager to "play" with men. Some of them are desperate to get sex and become women. It is what it is.

Nonce alert

Is that you EO? I knew it! Its so easy.

Hey EO, how many clones do you have on this forum?

That assumption is almost as bad as your views on paedophilia.