!990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post Reply
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6070
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

!990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by goose 5 »

12 rounds. is the result any different ?
cannonball
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 148
Joined: 12 Jul 2007, 19:10

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by cannonball »

Foreman gets to him eventually, 8-9 rounds
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15127
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Norton by decision. Foreman just couldn't put his punches together like he used to. He still had some power (though not like he used to), but that wouldn't be enough. He might hurt Norton, but he wouldn't be able to follow up.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46317
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by gilgamesh »

Foreman either knocks him out late after much more of a struggle or loses a decision. He definitely wouldn't have demolished him with ease like he did.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9435
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by tiny_acres »

Peak Norton wins UD 12 or 15
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by HomicideHenry »

I could see the old George Foreman reverting back to the young George Foreman tactics just to drop Norton back on his butt. It's often understated but sometimes the older George Foreman would incorporate tactics that the young George Foreman did with low blows or kidney punches. I think some men have your number no matter how old they would get. Tough as Evander Holyfield was he always maintains George Foreman hit him the hardest of anyone. So I tend to think eventually George Foreman would have got him it might not have been a two round obliteration but he might have done it in five or eight rounds.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by oogiebe »

tiny_acres wrote: 18 Feb 2023, 20:04 Peak Norton wins UD 12 or 15
An odd occurrence, but I disagree Tiny. I think George gets him again, only it'll take longer.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9435
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by tiny_acres »

oogiebe wrote: 18 Feb 2023, 21:13
tiny_acres wrote: 18 Feb 2023, 20:04 Peak Norton wins UD 12 or 15
An odd occurrence, but I disagree Tiny. I think George gets him again, only it'll take longer.
I think the old Foreman is over rated. If it wasn't for an undeserved title shot at Moorer who was a weak champion we wouldn't even be having this conversation
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by oogiebe »

tiny_acres wrote: 18 Feb 2023, 21:16
oogiebe wrote: 18 Feb 2023, 21:13
tiny_acres wrote: 18 Feb 2023, 20:04 Peak Norton wins UD 12 or 15
An odd occurrence, but I disagree Tiny. I think George gets him again, only it'll take longer.
I think the old Foreman is over rated. If it wasn't for an undeserved title shot at Moorer who was a weak champion we wouldn't even be having this conversation
Loved the big man's comeback. Think he reached his 2.0 peak vs Holy. That George would've beaten Kenny again. he went downhill fast after that fight.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by HomicideHenry »

I don't think Michael Moorer was a weak champion or weak heavyweight. But his ego certainly got in the way of himself because he fell into the trap that George Foreman set, and Teddy Atlas was telling him in between rounds what was going on and he refused to listen.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46317
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by gilgamesh »

HomicideHenry wrote: 18 Feb 2023, 22:55 I don't think Michael Moorer was a weak champion or weak heavyweight. But his ego certainly got in the way of himself because he fell into the trap that George Foreman set, and Teddy Atlas was telling him in between rounds what was going on and he refused to listen.
Yeah honestly once he won 8 solid rounds. Which he had done by this point, he could've just kinda went into survival mode, and probably saved his title.

But I think we got a better story with him falling into the old man's trap.

We oughta throw Michael Moorer into some mythical fights though, and see who some might think he'd beat.

I could see him doing well against the likes of Floyd Patterson or Ingemar Johansson for instance. I could see him holding his own with a Jersey Joe Walcott. Moorer obviously ain't the all time best Heavyweight, but he's no pushover.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15668
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by elmersalsa »

Ken Norton by decision. Big George in the 90s decade was too slow. But had better stamina and hit harder.

I could see Norton's fast left jab as the key of this fight. He would be countering beautifully, but he ain't gonna knock Foreman out. He was too big.

This is a Michael Moorer fight all over again. But this time, Norton is the winner. By a large margin, too.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by DrDuke »

Norton by a shotout, unless he blinks like Moorer.
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4594
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by scorpio83 »

Peak Norton to outbox and outpunch the 1990s Foreman on the outside to take a decision under the 15 rounder.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by oogiebe »

scorpio83 wrote: 19 Feb 2023, 12:30 Peak Norton to outbox and outpunch the 1990s Foreman on the outside to take a decision under the 15 rounder.
Fighting on the inside with big George is exactly the wrong thing to do for Kenny.

EDIT: Oops. Read that wrong. :oops:
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by margaret thatcher »

interesting fight..........i tend to agree with tiny that old george often gets overrated. he won the title, but hardly won a round in doing so, barely got past alex steward and was badly busted up in doing it, nearly shutout by morrison, gift vs shultz, etc. not like all these guys were iron chins either. george was game vs vander but well well beaten too

he still had power though, and would be a major threat to catch kenny, but i tend to think prime kenny would have the hustle to stay out of trouble enough and survive any follow up from the older, slower george who didnt put his shots together as well
wrighty
Welterweight
Posts: 1015
Joined: 21 Jan 2016, 21:49

Re: !990's George Foreman versus Peak Ken Norton

Post by wrighty »

I think it's similar to when Big George had it with Tommy Morrison. I'm not sure if Ken would try to stay away or if he would go to war. If Ken boxed then he would win the decision. No one would want to have a swing up with George at any age.
Post Reply