The rematch terms weren’t agreed. Alex Krassyuk said Fury was not to blame.
Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk | PPV - 18 May 2024
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1475
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Bored of it all. Talk is cheap.
-
big lennox
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2550
- Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Doofy, what hurts the most, that your hero ducked Uysk, or that it is now clear that Fury is not half the man that Joshua is? Or is it a combination of both?BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:52Alex Krassyuk said Fury wasn’t to blame. Krassyuk knows why Usyk fled. The Sky pundits don’t.big lennox wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:25He quit camp because he had had enough of being jerked about by Fury, who never wanted the fight.
In credibility terms, Fury is now a busted flush. But, it seems he would rather be known as a bottle job than actually getting beat, which might have happened against Uysk.
Even Matt Macklin and Johnny Nelson are saying the Fury didn't fancy it against Uysk, and they are fellow pros.
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
This has obviously affected Doofy in a big way. To find out your hero is actually what everyone else had said he was, a shitehouse ducker, it's going to hurt. Big time.
I can fully understand him lashing out in denial and going into trolling overload. Difficult times.

I can fully understand him lashing out in denial and going into trolling overload. Difficult times.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
I’m embarrassing myself and you’re banging on about Emmanuel Steward.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:37you realise a flight to poland isn't a one way trip? It's not like he was on a nazi cattle truck is it. It's a 3 hour flight, he could easily fly back.
Given the fact Fury, ACCORDING TO HIS OWN TRAINER, wasn't even in camp at all, I think it's pretty clear which of the two fighters had the most serious intention to fight.
I wish you would shut up now, you're embarrassing yourself.
As predicted by myself and others just minutes ago, Warren is now talking about Fury retiring.
I expect that in the next days or weeks, Steward will also announce he is no longer working with Fury - I get the impression he's fed up already of working with Fury, as he is full of shite and chaotic.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16408
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Fury wasn't ever in camp as confirmed by his trainer, just wasting everybody's time.BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:29It seems like the fight was agreed until Usyk’s team brought up the rematch split. Usyk quit camp and headed for Poland before it was negotiated.big lennox wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:25He quit camp because he had had enough of being jerked about by Fury, who never wanted the fight.
In credibility terms, Fury is now a busted flush. But, it seems he would rather be known as a bottle job than actually getting beat, which might have happened against Uysk.
Even Matt Macklin and Johnny Nelson are saying the Fury didn't fancy it against Uysk, and they are fellow pros.
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
He never wrote Emmanuel, he just wrote Steward, as in Sugar Hill Steward, the boxing trainer who came over from the US to train Lawrence Okolie but not train Fury.BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:56I’m embarrassing myself and you’re banging on about Emmanuel Steward.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:37you realise a flight to poland isn't a one way trip? It's not like he was on a nazi cattle truck is it. It's a 3 hour flight, he could easily fly back.
Given the fact Fury, ACCORDING TO HIS OWN TRAINER, wasn't even in camp at all, I think it's pretty clear which of the two fighters had the most serious intention to fight.
I wish you would shut up now, you're embarrassing yourself.
As predicted by myself and others just minutes ago, Warren is now talking about Fury retiring.
I expect that in the next days or weeks, Steward will also announce he is no longer working with Fury - I get the impression he's fed up already of working with Fury, as he is full of shite and chaotic.
You feeling OK Doofy? You seem to be a bit all over the place. Well at least you've now admitted to embarrassing yourself. That's a start.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
If Fury wanted this fight it would be happening.BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:53The rematch terms weren’t agreed. Alex Krassyuk said Fury was not to blame.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
You absolute pelican.BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:36 Usyk may as well have said he’d take 20%. It’s irrelevant because he did a runner.
Frank actually said that Usyk’s team accepted a bet with him for the £1m.
How do the charities or the war effort benefit from Usyk spending the winter in Turkey before fleeing for Poland?
Fury went back and forth on his word about the rematch. Usyk didn't even want it in the first place. Then he agreed and suggested the rematch should be 70/30 for the winner of the first fight.
I stress this one out once again because I've seen you enough twisting and turning around everything in order to desperately find a pro-Fury angle and defend the indefensible. One might say you act in debates like you were "a conger eel all oiled up".
Usyk didn't just want 70% for himself in the rematch. He was willing to risk taking 30% again in case Fraudy wins the first fight. That's how confident he was he would beat the ogre.
But Fury turned it down. Imagine the scenes: he offered an insulting 30% to the reigning unified champion, never meant to be accepted of course. Then when his bluff was called, he said he'd changed his mind again and wanted a rematch again where Usyk takes 50% if he wins the first fight but he takes 80% if he wins the first fight.
Imagine this: "Hey, undefeated and reigning unified heavyweight champion of the world, here is my offer: you take 30% in the first fight and in case you beat me in my own backyard where the odds would be stacked heavily against you with my referee, my judges, my venue, my crowd, you'll get 50% for the rematch as undefeated and newly crowned undisputed heavyweight champion of the world. On the other hand, I get a guaranteed 70% for the first fight, and 80% for the second if I win the first. Good deal, yeah?"
That was the point Usyk had enough. After making concessions about:
- getting dragged away from Saudi where he already made a deal
- being denied the 50/50 split he was promised by both Arum and Warren last year
- fighting in Fury's backyard no less where a points decision would have almost surely been awarded to his opponent
- being denied a 60/40 split for the winner
- being insulted and disrespected with a 30% lowball offer
- being pushed around with the "rematch on, rematch off, then it's on again" shenanigans
- being denied the "70/30 in the rematch for the winner of the first fight" offer
- being insulted and disrespected by an "even though you'd be undisputed by then, it's 50% in the rematch for you" offer
... so after all this, Usyk had enough, upon realising no matter what he agrees to, there will always be something else. That's where he drew the line. No champion ever in the history of the sport would have NOT walked away after the 30% thing. And while you made no comments when Usyk kept making concession after concession after concession, giving in to all demands of Fury while not demanding anything himself, you have the f*cking cheek to say "he did a runner".
Absolutely boggles the mind, you really are just a useless troll, as others keep saying it.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Emmanuel Steward died years ago you buffoon.BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:56I’m embarrassing myself and you’re banging on about Emmanuel Steward.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:37you realise a flight to poland isn't a one way trip? It's not like he was on a nazi cattle truck is it. It's a 3 hour flight, he could easily fly back.
Given the fact Fury, ACCORDING TO HIS OWN TRAINER, wasn't even in camp at all, I think it's pretty clear which of the two fighters had the most serious intention to fight.
I wish you would shut up now, you're embarrassing yourself.
As predicted by myself and others just minutes ago, Warren is now talking about Fury retiring.
I expect that in the next days or weeks, Steward will also announce he is no longer working with Fury - I get the impression he's fed up already of working with Fury, as he is full of shite and chaotic.
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Krassyuk played that interview with a very straight bat. What he was actually saying was that no-one was particularly to blame as everyone had their own requirements.BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:53The rematch terms weren’t agreed. Alex Krassyuk said Fury was not to blame.
The implication was, however, that it was Fury’s requirements that weren’t being met (and you could tell that from F W also)
You have to remember that Krassyuk (who definitely didn’t blame Usyk) has a vested interest in this fight happening so was being ambassadorial.
Please stop saying Usyk quit camp. It’s ludicrous. Fury wasn’t even in camp - according to his own trainer.
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Sugar Hill appears to be trying to distance himself from the whole fiasco. Must've been frustrating trying to get going with Okolie, yet having to let Fury perform that fake workout on the bag alongside Okolie. He seems to be the only one from the Fury side keeping his dignity and not letting out a deluge of lies. It wouldn't be surprising if there's a split there soon.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16408
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Yeah can't imagine Tommy Hearns and co pulling these stunts back in the dayThe Gratest wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 05:20 Sugar Hill appears to be trying to distance himself from the whole fiasco. Must've been frustrating trying to get going with Okolie, yet having to let Fury perform that fake workout on the bag alongside Okolie. He seems to be the only one from the Fury side keeping his dignity and not letting out a deluge of lies. It wouldn't be surprising if there's a split there soon.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
His trainer is getting his %age from Okolie. If Usyk had signed do you think he would not have wanted a %age from Fury.Frostieballs wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 05:12Krassyuk played that interview with a very straight bat. What he was actually saying was that no-one was particularly to blame as everyone had their own requirements.
The implication was, however, that it was Fury’s requirements that weren’t being met (and you could tell that from F W also)
You have to remember that Krassyuk (who definitely didn’t blame Usyk) has a vested interest in this fight happening so was being ambassadorial.
Please stop saying Usyk quit camp. It’s ludicrous. Fury wasn’t even in camp - according to his own trainer.
Fury trains every day. His promoter booked the stadium. Usyk fled.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Krassyuk said Fury wasn’t to blame. Those who criticize Fury daily on a forum ignore the man in the negotiations.Frostieballs wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 05:12Krassyuk played that interview with a very straight bat. What he was actually saying was that no-one was particularly to blame as everyone had their own requirements.
The implication was, however, that it was Fury’s requirements that weren’t being met (and you could tell that from F W also)
You have to remember that Krassyuk (who definitely didn’t blame Usyk) has a vested interest in this fight happening so was being ambassadorial.
Please stop saying Usyk quit camp. It’s ludicrous. Fury wasn’t even in camp - according to his own trainer.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
If one side is acting in bad faith there isnt any negotiation.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Making concessions is easy when you don’t intend to honour them.887986 wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 05:06You absolute pelican.BigDoofus wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 04:36 Usyk may as well have said he’d take 20%. It’s irrelevant because he did a runner.
Frank actually said that Usyk’s team accepted a bet with him for the £1m.
How do the charities or the war effort benefit from Usyk spending the winter in Turkey before fleeing for Poland?
Fury went back and forth on his word about the rematch. Usyk didn't even want it in the first place. Then he agreed and suggested the rematch should be 70/30 for the winner of the first fight.
I stress this one out once again because I've seen you enough twisting and turning around everything in order to desperately find a pro-Fury angle and defend the indefensible. One might say you act in debates like you were "a conger eel all oiled up".
Usyk didn't just want 70% for himself in the rematch. He was willing to risk taking 30% again in case Fraudy wins the first fight. That's how confident he was he would beat the ogre.
But Fury turned it down. Imagine the scenes: he offered an insulting 30% to the reigning unified champion, never meant to be accepted of course. Then when his bluff was called, he said he'd changed his mind again and wanted a rematch again where Usyk takes 50% if he wins the first fight but he takes 80% if he wins the first fight.
Imagine this: "Hey, undefeated and reigning unified heavyweight champion of the world, here is my offer: you take 30% in the first fight and in case you beat me in my own backyard where the odds would be stacked heavily against you with my referee, my judges, my venue, my crowd, you'll get 50% for the rematch as undefeated and newly crowned undisputed heavyweight champion of the world. On the other hand, I get a guaranteed 70% for the first fight, and 80% for the second if I win the first. Good deal, yeah?"
That was the point Usyk had enough. After making concessions about:
- getting dragged away from Saudi where he already made a deal
- being denied the 50/50 split he was promised by both Arum and Warren last year
- fighting in Fury's backyard no less where a points decision would have almost surely been awarded to his opponent
- being denied a 60/40 split for the winner
- being insulted and disrespected with a 30% lowball offer
- being pushed around with the "rematch on, rematch off, then it's on again" shenanigans
- being denied the "70/30 in the rematch for the winner of the first fight" offer
- being insulted and disrespected by an "even though you'd be undisputed by then, it's 50% in the rematch for you" offer
... so after all this, Usyk had enough, upon realising no matter what he agrees to, there will always be something else. That's where he drew the line. No champion ever in the history of the sport would have NOT walked away after the 30% thing. And while you made no comments when Usyk kept making concession after concession after concession, giving in to all demands of Fury while not demanding anything himself, you have the f*cking cheek to say "he did a runner".
Absolutely boggles the mind, you really are just a useless troll, as others keep saying it.
You’ve had a rant without answering the question. How did Usyk’s winter in the sunshine help the war effort?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Yes, it's pretty clear from Warren's interview, that the breakdown in negotiation was due to Fury's demands, and that the two promoters basically did everything they could.Frostieballs wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 05:12Krassyuk played that interview with a very straight bat. What he was actually saying was that no-one was particularly to blame as everyone had their own requirements.
The implication was, however, that it was Fury’s requirements that weren’t being met (and you could tell that from F W also)
You have to remember that Krassyuk (who definitely didn’t blame Usyk) has a vested interest in this fight happening so was being ambassadorial.
Please stop saying Usyk quit camp. It’s ludicrous. Fury wasn’t even in camp - according to his own trainer.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
CORRECT , He quit camp and went home but at least he was in camp preparing for war . Tyson did'nt even go into camp has his own trainer said . GOTTA RELIZE YOUR BEING DICKED AROUND WHEN YOUR OPPONENT IS ISSUING DEMANDS BUT NOT EVEN IN training camp
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
Fleeing haha. Your boy has got feet of clay, hard for you to accept clearly.
If Fury wanted this fight it would be signed and we could all look forward to it.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
His point was that Usyk thinks he gets a better deal in Saudi later this year.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 05:42Yes, it's pretty clear from Warren's interview, that the breakdown in negotiation was due to Fury's demands, and that the two promoters basically did everything they could.Frostieballs wrote: ↑24 Mar 2023, 05:12Krassyuk played that interview with a very straight bat. What he was actually saying was that no-one was particularly to blame as everyone had their own requirements.
The implication was, however, that it was Fury’s requirements that weren’t being met (and you could tell that from F W also)
You have to remember that Krassyuk (who definitely didn’t blame Usyk) has a vested interest in this fight happening so was being ambassadorial.
Please stop saying Usyk quit camp. It’s ludicrous. Fury wasn’t even in camp - according to his own trainer.
It was conclusively clear in Krassyuk’s interview that Fury wasn’t to blame.
-
The Gratest
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6495
- Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Oleksandr Usyk - 29 April 2023?
No he didn't you silly silly troll with terrible reading comprehension.
He said, from Fury's perspective, he wouldn't blame him for not wanting the fight and putting so many obstacles in the way ie it was clear he wanted a way out of the fight and he doesn't blame him because he clearly wasn't confident in beating Usyk.