Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post Reply
Redback Rasta
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2907
Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53

Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by Redback Rasta »

Bellow continues to make noise about how, at 40, he could beat Rosanski.

What is the motivation for this? Just making a headline? Has he blown his earnings already? Do you think he is serious about a comeback?
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39328
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by margaret thatcher »

rosanksi always does better than people expect, the polish briderweight great is more effective than he looks :bag:
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by tonyevs »

Bellew trying to stay relevant now Eddie's star is dimming.
Bellew was very very fortunate to win a world title belt, and face such a worn out David Hate.

He'd do a Fury if Rosanski offered him the opportunity - 70% split and for the fight to be in his nans garden.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by leejonesjnr »

I don’t think Bellew has any intention of boxing Rosanski, he just likes a bit of attention from iFL and the like.
He might end up doing an exhibition now that they are gathering popularity but nothing proper.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by HomicideHenry »

Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.

Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
emallini
Middleweight
Posts: 1676
Joined: 08 Nov 2013, 12:31

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by emallini »

Rosanski stops him
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by Spud »

I hope it doesn’t happen, fot the same reasons as so many have highlighted already.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13411
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by jameswilson »

By the time he is ready to fight Rozanski will have lost to his mandatory.
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by oogiebe »

You could've just left this as, "Is Bellow Serious About fighting?"
cormack
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2965
Joined: 30 May 2019, 07:13

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by cormack »

tonyevs wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 02:02 Bellew trying to stay relevant now Eddie's star is dimming.
Bellew was very very fortunate to win a world title belt, and face such a worn out David Hate.

He'd do a Fury if Rosanski offered him the opportunity - 70% split and for the fight to be in his nans garden.
I wouldnt say he was fortunate as that was a hell of a scrap .
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

HomicideHenry wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 07:27 Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.

Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?
Redback Rasta
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2907
Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by Redback Rasta »

Boxing is full of unwise comebacks and this has the look of one. Disappointing too that Hearn seems to be encouraging it rather than discouraging it.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by HomicideHenry »

Teddy's Toupee wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 15:53
HomicideHenry wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 07:27 Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.

Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?
I said more than 3 years.

Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13411
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by jameswilson »

HomicideHenry wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 19:10
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 15:53
HomicideHenry wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 07:27 Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.

Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?
I said more than 3 years.

Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
:lol:
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8608
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by coneye »

Would'nt be suprised one little bit if he comes back , would imagine Hearn is pissing in his ear big time , he needs headline fighters , simple has that , I think Hearn and think , Oh how the mighty have fallen
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by leejonesjnr »

coneye wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 21:08 Would'nt be suprised one little bit if he comes back , would imagine Hearn is pissing in his ear big time , he needs headline fighters , simple has that , I think Hearn and think , Oh how the mighty have fallen
Bellew isnt a big seller is he?
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 6013
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by joshj909 »

margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 00:45 rosanksi always does better than people expect, the polish briderweight great is more effective than he looks :bag:
Yep, there's something about him. Looks physically awful, has an awful fighting style, always expected to lose, always gets the KO. He won't get to the very top but he's weirdly effective against the chinny limited guys. Think I'd actually favour him to KO Bellew.
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6883
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by chinarich »

The chance of becoming a two weight world champion (even at a joke weight which only one organisation recognises) might be irresistible for someone who likes talking about himself as much as Bellew does...
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39328
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by margaret thatcher »

ya i agree, would favour rosanski to ko him
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by Ezzard »

Hope TB stays retired and enjoys his health, wealth and family. He doesn't need to pick up pennies on the M25.
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

jameswilson wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 19:48
HomicideHenry wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 19:10
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 15:53
Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?
I said more than 3 years.

Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
:lol:
Can't argue with facts. In my defence I posted from memory, whereas Homi no doubt scoured the BoxRec database to come up with the exact years, months and days.
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by watsupdoc87 »

Teddy's Toupee wrote: 29 Jun 2023, 08:52
jameswilson wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 19:48
HomicideHenry wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 19:10

I said more than 3 years.

Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
:lol:
Can't argue with facts. In my defence I posted from memory, whereas Homi no doubt scoured the BoxRec database to come up with the exact years, months and days.
Hang your fukin head in shame you were 1 month and 5 days off. Tut tut :bag:
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

watsupdoc87 wrote: 29 Jun 2023, 10:08
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 29 Jun 2023, 08:52
jameswilson wrote: 28 Jun 2023, 19:48

:lol:
Can't argue with facts. In my defence I posted from memory, whereas Homi no doubt scoured the BoxRec database to come up with the exact years, months and days.
Hang your fukin head in shame you were 1 month and 5 days off. Tut tut :bag:
:oops:
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by Ezzard »

Leonard is a once in a lifetime guy. Not really evidence that a normal human could do it.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103023
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

So the WBC would accept Bellew as a challenger for Rosanski..
Post Reply