Conor Benn - What Next?

Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 4982
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Glass Joe »



Gary Sykes ex trainer has good videos.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26488
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by KiwiRider »

Glass Joe wrote: 05 Jul 2023, 15:26

Gary Sykes ex trainer has good videos.
Thanks Joe, that was concise and informative. :TU:
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4480
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by dookus »

Blueprint wrote: 05 Jul 2023, 15:11
dookus wrote: 05 Jul 2023, 03:48
Blueprint wrote: 04 Jul 2023, 18:10 The scientific evidence is very compelling. No idea what people were expecting, but If they can prove his faulty gene causes chlomofine storage, and the positive samples are consistent with egg contamination, this could clear him.
Without strong supporting evidence, it doesn't sound very compelling to me. How can they possibly distinguish metabolites of clomiphene from contaminated eggs vs from intentional ingestion when it's the same basic substance?
They doctor in that video cited a study commissioned by Wada. Apparently they produce different metabolytes to one another. Apparently Benns's metaboloytes are consistent with the egg contamination athletes.
That's interesting, there are studies that show it may be possible to distinguish the two. For example https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35341524/

Question now then is: how sound is the conclusion that his metabolites are consistent with egg contamination rather than doping? That'll depend heavily on the test results themselves, and what his team has tested to determine which metabolites were present at the time of the failed test (bearing in mind that up until now, their case has been that the VADA samples - the ones that matter - must have been contaminated).
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 2002
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Frostieballs »

Apparently UKAD set to rule on this next week. Funny how there is sudden urgency now.

As I said before, he will be fighting by the end of the year, probably against Eubank.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28311
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Coco »

Frostieballs wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 07:37 Apparently UKAD set to rule on this next week. Funny how there is sudden urgency now.

As I said before, he will be fighting by the end of the year, probably against Eubank.
And prob in Dubai
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by maverick23 »

Frostieballs wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 07:37 Apparently UKAD set to rule on this next week. Funny how there is sudden urgency now.

As I said before, he will be fighting by the end of the year, probably against Eubank.
I wonder how thorough UKAD will be/can be given the timeframe of this new evidence. Surprisingly Simon Jordan appeared to be taken in by the new story as a potentially justifiable reason for clomiphene being in Benn’ system but from what the ‘expert’ said it’s based on new research. How can UKAD try and corroborate that next week if there’s no discussions/sharing of information at the moment?
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 2002
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Frostieballs »

maverick23 wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 09:35
Frostieballs wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 07:37 Apparently UKAD set to rule on this next week. Funny how there is sudden urgency now.

As I said before, he will be fighting by the end of the year, probably against Eubank.
I wonder how thorough UKAD will be/can be given the timeframe of this new evidence. Surprisingly Simon Jordan appeared to be taken in by the new story as a potentially justifiable reason for clomiphene being in Benn’ system but from what the ‘expert’ said it’s based on new research. How can UKAD try and corroborate that next week if there’s no discussions/sharing of information at the moment?
From what I understand they are sharing now.

Either way, there will be a fudge if required. A lifting of suspension whilst evidence is reviewed.

This is all too familiar.
Last edited by Frostieballs on 06 Jul 2023, 14:05, edited 1 time in total.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8565
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by coneye »

maverick23 wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 09:35
Frostieballs wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 07:37 Apparently UKAD set to rule on this next week. Funny how there is sudden urgency now.

As I said before, he will be fighting by the end of the year, probably against Eubank.
I wonder how thorough UKAD will be/can be given the timeframe of this new evidence. Surprisingly Simon Jordan appeared to be taken in by the new story as a potentially justifiable reason for clomiphene being in Benn’ system but from what the ‘expert’ said it’s based on new research. How can UKAD try and corroborate that next week if there’s no discussions/sharing of information at the moment?
Or could it be Simon knows or been told if he does'nt lay off a bit on his interviews , there will be NO interviews anymore ,
MasterG
Super Featherweight
Posts: 7412
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 16:45

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by MasterG »

Benn will have his ban back dated. He will be fighting before the end of the year. It's all wanks and stains
Boxingpat
Flyweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 03 Jul 2023, 11:42

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Boxingpat »

coneye wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 11:07
maverick23 wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 09:35
Frostieballs wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 07:37 Apparently UKAD set to rule on this next week. Funny how there is sudden urgency now.

As I said before, he will be fighting by the end of the year, probably against Eubank.
I wonder how thorough UKAD will be/can be given the timeframe of this new evidence. Surprisingly Simon Jordan appeared to be taken in by the new story as a potentially justifiable reason for clomiphene being in Benn’ system but from what the ‘expert’ said it’s based on new research. How can UKAD try and corroborate that next week if there’s no discussions/sharing of information at the moment?
Or could it be Simon knows or been told if he does'nt lay off a bit on his interviews , there will be NO interviews anymore ,
White and Jordan gets 1mln listners and loads of YouTube views. In this environment the promotion companies need the show
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by maverick23 »

coneye wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 11:07
maverick23 wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 09:35
Frostieballs wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 07:37 Apparently UKAD set to rule on this next week. Funny how there is sudden urgency now.

As I said before, he will be fighting by the end of the year, probably against Eubank.
I wonder how thorough UKAD will be/can be given the timeframe of this new evidence. Surprisingly Simon Jordan appeared to be taken in by the new story as a potentially justifiable reason for clomiphene being in Benn’ system but from what the ‘expert’ said it’s based on new research. How can UKAD try and corroborate that next week if there’s no discussions/sharing of information at the moment?
Or could it be Simon knows or been told if he does'nt lay off a bit on his interviews , there will be NO interviews anymore ,
It’s not like they’ve been giving TalkSPORT loads of interviews. They probably asked to go TalkSPORT as it probably generates more views/listens than the vast bulk of other routes.

They’ve pivoted as a team to trying to stay away from the media with regardless to the rationale behind the failures to seemingly now seeking it to push the new narrative.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8565
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by coneye »

maverick23 wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 14:40
coneye wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 11:07
maverick23 wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 09:35

I wonder how thorough UKAD will be/can be given the timeframe of this new evidence. Surprisingly Simon Jordan appeared to be taken in by the new story as a potentially justifiable reason for clomiphene being in Benn’ system but from what the ‘expert’ said it’s based on new research. How can UKAD try and corroborate that next week if there’s no discussions/sharing of information at the moment?
Or could it be Simon knows or been told if he does'nt lay off a bit on his interviews , there will be NO interviews anymore ,
It’s not like they’ve been giving TalkSPORT loads of interviews. They probably asked to go TalkSPORT as it probably generates more views/listens than the vast bulk of other routes.

They’ve pivoted as a team to trying to stay away from the media with regardless to the rationale behind the failures to seemingly now seeking it to push the new narrative.
Will say i enjoy watching them , i don't watch all talk sports i'm not in Britain but enjoyed what i've seen especielly when Simon gets his nose to the ground , reminds me of a terrier , he'll keep trying till he gets what he wants :lol: :lol: , sometimes you can see him going quiet , trying to think of a way in the back door :lol: :lol:
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Controversial »

Is there a hearing ?



Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 4982
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Glass Joe »

most likley he will get a backdated ban and be able to box this year sometime.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

Presumably he’s grabbed a tribunal date, following the process Amir Khan found himself in. Knowing UKAD I don’t see less than 2 years. I don’t see why it wouldn’t necessarily be 3 or 4 years.
blanca
Middleweight
Posts: 1868
Joined: 21 May 2014, 13:15

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by blanca »

That twitter thread is proof, if need be, that there's a whole lot of stupid/gullible/arsekissing (any or all)people in the world. Apparently someone who has failed 2 drugs tests is innocent :lol: :lol:
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2697
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Flump »

coneye wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 18:12
maverick23 wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 14:40
coneye wrote: 06 Jul 2023, 11:07

Or could it be Simon knows or been told if he does'nt lay off a bit on his interviews , there will be NO interviews anymore ,
It’s not like they’ve been giving TalkSPORT loads of interviews. They probably asked to go TalkSPORT as it probably generates more views/listens than the vast bulk of other routes.

They’ve pivoted as a team to trying to stay away from the media with regardless to the rationale behind the failures to seemingly now seeking it to push the new narrative.
Will say i enjoy watching them , i don't watch all talk sports i'm not in Britain but enjoyed what i've seen especielly when Simon gets his nose to the ground , reminds me of a terrier , he'll keep trying till he gets what he wants :lol: :lol: , sometimes you can see him going quiet , trying to think of a way in the back door :lol: :lol:
I think Jordan's level is enthusiastic casual, but he has a good amount of reach and clearly loves the game. I'd rather have him asking the questions than, say, IFL.
Redback Rasta
Welterweight
Posts: 2907
Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Redback Rasta »

I don't know anyone who isn't heartily sick of this saga still being around.

Hearn was telling anyone who would listen 'wait until the the truth comes out' very shortly after the truth did come out, the truth that Benn had tested positive twice. Since then this 'truth' Hearn was promising has changed flavour about 4 times.

Surely the powers that be won't swallow this bullsh1t story being offered, as 'proof' of Benn's innocence?
si7dog7
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1009
Joined: 26 Feb 2013, 14:42

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by si7dog7 »

Forget a weight drained Eubank JR
Forget a semi retired Kell
Forget an old man like Paq


Go for it…
Fight Boots

Nah. Right division. No advantage. No upside
C’mon Eggie, make a fight like this.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

si7dog7 wrote: 10 Jul 2023, 17:08 Forget a weight drained Eubank JR
Forget a semi retired Kell
Forget an old man like Paq


Go for it…
Fight Boots

Nah. Right division. No advantage. No upside
C’mon Eggie, make a fight like this.
UKAD don’t really do less than 2 years. An ice hockey player recently got an 18 month add-on to an 8 year ban just for doing some ice hockey coaching. I see no way on earth that Benn gets treated more leniently than Khan. So that surely at best he gets to fight a warm up at the end of 2024.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9143
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by gregregegg »

I now think Benn will fight Eubank this year…

just the way ed keeps saying stuff like “hasn’t been a big brittish fight like this booked since benn vs eubank” and other comments like that while talking about AJ Vs Whyte. Seen him do it a few times, seems to be on his mind and he seems to wanna keep mentioning how big it was…
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1931
Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by My T Sharp »

polecateddy wrote: 10 Jul 2023, 17:51
si7dog7 wrote: 10 Jul 2023, 17:08 Forget a weight drained Eubank JR
Forget a semi retired Kell
Forget an old man like Paq


Go for it…
Fight Boots

Nah. Right division. No advantage. No upside
C’mon Eggie, make a fight like this.
UKAD don’t really do less than 2 years. An ice hockey player recently got an 18 month add-on to an 8 year ban just for doing some ice hockey coaching. I see no way on earth that Benn gets treated more leniently than Khan. So that surely at best he gets to fight a warm up at the end of 2024.
UKAD withdrew charges from Dillian Whyte after a failed test in June 2019 after receiving evidence and explanations.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

My T Sharp wrote: 11 Jul 2023, 02:11
polecateddy wrote: 10 Jul 2023, 17:51
si7dog7 wrote: 10 Jul 2023, 17:08 Forget a weight drained Eubank JR
Forget a semi retired Kell
Forget an old man like Paq


Go for it…
Fight Boots

Nah. Right division. No advantage. No upside
C’mon Eggie, make a fight like this.
UKAD don’t really do less than 2 years. An ice hockey player recently got an 18 month add-on to an 8 year ban just for doing some ice hockey coaching. I see no way on earth that Benn gets treated more leniently than Khan. So that surely at best he gets to fight a warm up at the end of 2024.
UKAD withdrew charges from Dillian Whyte after a failed test in June 2019 after receiving evidence and explanations.
I think if that was a likely outcome it would have happened a long time ago for Conor.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by maverick23 »

polecateddy wrote: 11 Jul 2023, 02:35
My T Sharp wrote: 11 Jul 2023, 02:11
polecateddy wrote: 10 Jul 2023, 17:51

UKAD don’t really do less than 2 years. An ice hockey player recently got an 18 month add-on to an 8 year ban just for doing some ice hockey coaching. I see no way on earth that Benn gets treated more leniently than Khan. So that surely at best he gets to fight a warm up at the end of 2024.
UKAD withdrew charges from Dillian Whyte after a failed test in June 2019 after receiving evidence and explanations.
I think if that was a likely outcome it would have happened a long time ago for Conor.
The UKAD case is only being heard this week.

Khan, from what I read, offered no real excuse for his drug test failure.

Enzo Maccarinelli got 6 months I think for his failure as he was clearly able to justify it. I think, regardless of what we think of it, this will be similar and he’ll get something like 6 months.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

maverick23 wrote: 11 Jul 2023, 04:03
polecateddy wrote: 11 Jul 2023, 02:35
My T Sharp wrote: 11 Jul 2023, 02:11

UKAD withdrew charges from Dillian Whyte after a failed test in June 2019 after receiving evidence and explanations.
I think if that was a likely outcome it would have happened a long time ago for Conor.
The UKAD case is only being heard this week.

Khan, from what I read, offered no real excuse for his drug test failure.

Enzo Maccarinelli got 6 months I think for his failure as he was clearly able to justify it. I think, regardless of what we think of it, this will be similar and he’ll get something like 6 months.
You might be right. Is the hearing actually this week? I just wonder with Clomifene whether it will attract that much leniency. If UKAD don’t want it much weight on the elaborate egg theory, historically in other sports Clomifene - the well-known masking agent - is usually associated with 3-4 year bans. But I guess we’ll find out soon-ish now if Benn has engineered a soft sentence or not.
Post Reply