tegenm wrote:You're an African-American woman, yet you choose the Irish word for "natural" as your handle?
You should have chosen "stocaipuipéad" (sockpuppet).
Well taking the company line as u do, one would think that sockpuppet would be a more apt name for you!
Defending the indefensible just cause your fearfull leader does hardly puts u in a position to crack wise on someone elses handle TEGENM!
I've been critical, go back and read my posts. I disagree with Tszyu's designation for example. Our leader isn't fearful, it's just that he doesn't really give a shit about your persistent whining about his so-called "indefensible position", which has been defended before by him, and others. Really it isn't worth arguing with you, because nothing he says will ever be good enough for you.
Sure it sounds like there is an outrage in here, but mostly it is a bunch of people whose only posts are in this topic, probably in the form of sockpuppetry.
tegenm wrote:You're an African-American woman, yet you choose the Irish word for "natural" as your handle?
You should have chosen "stocaipuipéad" (sockpuppet).
Tegenm, why is it that instead of addressing my question you comment on my "handle"? My name here is inconsequential, its what I say that is important. Once again something that is absolutely IMPERTINENT to this discussion is bought up instead of a valid point. You have nothing better to add to this thread than what you think I should have chosen as a name?? If you would spend less time worrying about petty things such as screen names and spend more time researching records, this site would benefit greatly. It looks poorly on you and BoxRec when you fail to comment on the issues at hand but instead choose to resort to name calling and insulting anyone that is simply trying to make sure the site you work for has the correct information displayed. Now, if you would like to reply to any of the points I have made without name calling please do so, othewise please keep your comments to yourself and allow someone elso who is capable of having a real discussion to answer.
tegenm wrote:I've been critical, go back and read my posts. I disagree with Tszyu's designation for example. Our leader isn't fearful, it's just that he doesn't really give a shit about your persistent whining about his so-called "indefensible position", which has been defended before by him, and others. Really it isn't worth arguing with you, because nothing he says will ever be good enough for you.
Sure it sounds like there is an outrage in here, but mostly it is a bunch of people whose only posts are in this topic, probably in the form of sockpuppetry.
It is an indefensible position! John Shep's post has long ago been proven to be fallacious. The only other defense attempted is that "This is John Sheps's site and he can do whatever he wishes" and the people who are trying to right this wrong are being personally attacked. The only conclusion people viewing this thread can come to is that this record was altered and is being kept inaccurately for some reason/s that are not immediately obvious, but can certainly be guessed at. I really don't care about the reasons behind this, no reason is sufficient to ignore reality. CHANGE THE RECORD!
Basically theie argument boils down to "its John Sheps site he can do whatever the f*ck he wants" No wonder boxrec were rejected when they treid to become the offical record keepers with editing and record keeping that boils down to conjecture and opinions instead of facts 8)
shamboo wrote:Basically theie argument boils down to "its John Sheps site he can do whatever the f*ck he wants" No wonder boxrec were rejected when they treid to become the offical record keepers with editing and record keeping that boils down to conjecture and opinions instead of facts 8)
How many times do I have to tell you the profile information has nothing to do with record keeping? Probably as many times as I have to tell you to drop the subject.
Everything that needs to be said in this thread has been said. 
(And repeated over & over.) 