Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
I struggle to find a place for him in the top 20 or 30 all-time to be honest. Mind you, I struggle with Wlad and Joshua too.
None of these are in the conversation.
Are they?
Really?
None of these are in the conversation.
Are they?
Really?
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Wlad deserves a place of recognition. It was a very poor era, but he did face what was there and deservedly sat atop the dung heap.
Joshua fell short - Fury hasn't tried.
Joshua fell short - Fury hasn't tried.
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Can't rate him properly until he's finished fighting. At the moment, he's only beat an ancient Wlad and a wilder swinger who's beaten nobody good.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32913
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Don’t rate Fury, Joshua or Wilder in historical terms.
Don’t rate Wlad either, for that matter. Dominated a very weak era and would have been brutally ktfo by Vitali if they weren’t brothers.
Don’t rate Wlad either, for that matter. Dominated a very weak era and would have been brutally ktfo by Vitali if they weren’t brothers.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16848
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39327
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
all time top 10
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Fixed.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 15:46 all time top 10
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. (shades of)ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39327
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
I’d have slipped Luis Ortiz in at number 7 and dropped Holmes out. Agree with the rest though.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 15:46 all time top 10
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39327
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
ah good eye, i was being harsh on luis there
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Absolute horseshít, mags, you should be ashamed. Where's Pajkic?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 15:46 all time top 10
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Wallin is too high, I've got him at 6margaret thatcher wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 15:46 all time top 10
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Tyson Fury doesn’t currently have any historical standing as one of the greats.
That may change but I don’t think it will.
That may change but I don’t think it will.
-
Teddy's Toupee
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Where's John McDermott? Beat Fury in their first bout.dookus wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 16:35Absolute horseshít, mags, you should be ashamed. Where's Pajkic?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 15:46 all time top 10
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45234
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 15:46 all time top 10
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
, Vlad dominated a very weal era , Fury has not even tried to dominate a possibly even weaker eraBoxerbeetle wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 15:11 Don’t rate Fury, Joshua or Wilder in historical terms.
Don’t rate Wlad either, for that matter. Dominated a very weak era and would have been brutally ktfo by Vitali if they weren’t brothers.
-
Redback Rasta
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
These comparisons should be made at the end of careers.
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Come on now, Teddy, who are we to question Terry O Connor's judgement? Having been knocked out by McDermott Sr, he was surely best-placed to objectively assess his son's performance against Fury.Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑26 Oct 2023, 15:58Where's John McDermott? Beat Fury in their first bout.dookus wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 16:35Absolute horseshít, mags, you should be ashamed. Where's Pajkic?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 15:46 all time top 10
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
if fury does usyk, AJ and another name fighter....say zhang or Andy Ruiz.... I'd put him in the top 30.
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
I think he would need Hrgovic over Ruiz .. Hrg beat Zhang fairly recently, and Ruiz lost to AJ quite awhile back and has done practically nothing of note since.
Those Usyk, AJ, Zhang and Hrgovic fights would possibly take 3-4 yrs to do .. despite Fury saying he is after a new 10 fight deal, we all know he hasn't got long left - so they won't happen.
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
The thing is. I do f think there is anyone around near to give Iron Mike and I’ve got him 10-15 at best.
It’s all subjective of course. A matter of opinion.
Wlad might get number 20 coz he did beat Samuel Peter.
Ffs!
It’s all subjective of course. A matter of opinion.
Wlad might get number 20 coz he did beat Samuel Peter.
Ffs!
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
And that made no sense. Sorry try again. See above. Hopefully
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Wladimir is undoubtedly an all time Top 20 guy. I'd probably have him in the Top 10.
Fury has arguably surpassed Wladimir's accomplishments already or at least is on par with them. If he reigns a few more years, and gets the other names that are missing on his record in the Win column it elevates him greatly.
Fury has arguably surpassed Wladimir's accomplishments already or at least is on par with them. If he reigns a few more years, and gets the other names that are missing on his record in the Win column it elevates him greatly.
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Surpassed Wlad’s accomplishments?gilgamesh wrote: ↑27 Oct 2023, 12:52 Wladimir is undoubtedly an all time Top 20 guy. I'd probably have him in the Top 10.
Fury has arguably surpassed Wladimir's accomplishments already or at least is on par with them. If he reigns a few more years, and gets the other names that are missing on his record in the Win column it elevates him greatly.
Really
Ok he beat him in a bore fest
But surpassed his accomplishments?
Just can’t see that. Sorry.
Pray tell your reasoning. I’m happy to doff my cap to a good counter argument.