jake paul vs mike tyson
-
dickbelden
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 767
- Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45
jake paul vs mike tyson
just read 16 ounce gloves ? is this true ?
-
Perkin Warbeck
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: 25 Jun 2018, 19:53
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Perhaps if Jake Paul gets past Mike Tyson, he'll take on Clint Eastwood.
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Apparently that is true IF it is deemed an exhibition...
I read the camps are pushing for a legit sanctioned bout. WTF knows?
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
I don't think this fight will happen.
If I am wrong and it does happen, I think it will be heavily choreographed.
There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring, particularly against opponents 30 years younger: The Spectre of Holyfield should loom large of this event.
He was also 58 when he fought his exhibition against Belfort, who was a mere 14 years younger, but Evander still fell apart like slow cooked brisket when Vitor slightly upped the ante in their fight.
If I am wrong and it does happen, I think it will be heavily choreographed.
There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring, particularly against opponents 30 years younger: The Spectre of Holyfield should loom large of this event.
He was also 58 when he fought his exhibition against Belfort, who was a mere 14 years younger, but Evander still fell apart like slow cooked brisket when Vitor slightly upped the ante in their fight.
-
AngryGoon38
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 14:51
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Yeah, you're points obviously make sense. It really is common sense. At least to people with proper perception to reality.Syntax Error wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024, 12:01 I don't think this fight will happen.
If I am wrong and it does happen, I think it will be heavily choreographed.
There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring, particularly against opponents 30 years younger: The Spectre of Holyfield should loom large of this event.
He was also 58 when he fought his exhibition against Belfort, who was a mere 14 years younger, but Evander still fell apart like slow cooked brisket when Vitor slightly upped the ante in their fight.
Mike Tyson Should Not be having this bout. He has nothing to prove. At least we "Real Actual" boxing fans feel this way.
The "Casual type Boxing Fans" are of course mesmerized. They always are when they really shouldn't be.
There is a pretty strong likelihood that this won't end well.
Could Mike win..???
I actually believe so, but then what..?!?!
Jake just cares about money.
Seriously disappointed with him.
I thought he was better than this....
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5710
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Evander was told it would be like a sparring session. He was bamboozled by the promoters and caught off guard completely when belfort came out firingSyntax Error wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024, 12:01 I don't think this fight will happen.
If I am wrong and it does happen, I think it will be heavily choreographed.
There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring, particularly against opponents 30 years younger: The Spectre of Holyfield should loom large of this event.
He was also 58 when he fought his exhibition against Belfort, who was a mere 14 years younger, but Evander still fell apart like slow cooked brisket when Vitor slightly upped the ante in their fight.
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5710
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Another exihibition fight for big money. I don't care about it. Why not against David Tua, who is in great shape ? 
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Interesting article.
Looks like Holyfield was tricked, but it just further emphasises that men of his age shouldn't be anywhere near boxing rings, especially against much younger guys who have combat sport grounding.
Holyfield had the balance of a newborn giraffe and was slower than Windows 95 and just couldn't respond when Belfort upped the ante.
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Well he did fight 3.5 years ago. I honestly think Tyson looks better in recent years than he did in 2005
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
You don't think that might be because he was fighting another old man?
The saddest thing is that so many people think that Tyson is going to go through him like a buzzsaw. Tyson couldn't do that to journeymen 20 years ago. Jake Paul might not be an elite fighter, or even at a McBride/Williams level but he isn't embarrassingly bad, takes it seriously and looks like he is improving with each fight.AngryGoon38 wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024, 15:29Yeah, you're points obviously make sense. It really is common sense. At least to people with proper perception to reality.Syntax Error wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024, 12:01 I don't think this fight will happen.
If I am wrong and it does happen, I think it will be heavily choreographed.
There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring, particularly against opponents 30 years younger: The Spectre of Holyfield should loom large of this event.
He was also 58 when he fought his exhibition against Belfort, who was a mere 14 years younger, but Evander still fell apart like slow cooked brisket when Vitor slightly upped the ante in their fight.
Mike Tyson Should Not be having this bout. He has nothing to prove. At least we "Real Actual" boxing fans feel this way.
The "Casual type Boxing Fans" are of course mesmerized. They always are when they really shouldn't be.
There is a pretty strong likelihood that this won't end well.
Could Mike win..???
I actually believe so, but then what..?!?!
Jake just cares about money.
Seriously disappointed with him.
I thought he was better than this....![]()
I would love an old Mike to give him a lesson, but I personally just don't see it.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
That was an exhibition, not a fight, two old duffers having a body spar.
Tyson's shot to bits, has been for well over a decade.
This fight is an exhibition - neither man will try to hurt the other.
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
why so much talk about a sparring-show made to generate huge numbers ? boxing has became wwe. 
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Irresponsible in the first degree by all involved in this fight.
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
The thing that bugs me is that I think this clown, Paul, will actually try to KO Mike.
Total tool for taking this match and challenging a great, former Champ in his advanced years. As mentioned, Holyfield was used and abused and would hate the same for Mike.
Total tool for taking this match and challenging a great, former Champ in his advanced years. As mentioned, Holyfield was used and abused and would hate the same for Mike.
-
dickbelden
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 767
- Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
now they are saying 16 ounce gloves & 2 minute rounds---so so pathetic !
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
I can understand that.dickbelden wrote: ↑14 Apr 2024, 09:51 now they are saying 16 ounce gloves & 2 minute rounds---so so pathetic !
Tyson can't do 3 minute rounds at his age.
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Plus no judges so it's an Automatic draw should it go the distance. Which means there's no longer any result possible except Automatic Draw.dickbelden wrote: ↑14 Apr 2024, 09:51 now they are saying 16 ounce gloves & 2 minute rounds---so so pathetic !
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Today, ESPN announced that this will be a sanctioned pro fight.... but only 2-minute rounds and w/ 14 oz gloves.
-
Sendo Takeshi
- Flyweight
- Posts: 841
- Joined: 23 Dec 2023, 15:07
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
14 oz gloves and 8x2 min rounds..
What kind of pro fight is that?
It's only sanctioned because they know it would make more money than an exhibition.
What kind of pro fight is that?
It's only sanctioned because they know it would make more money than an exhibition.
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Mike's deluded if he thinks he will win. He was crap 20 years ago. Only thing he's going to get out of this is money and head trauma. He has enough of both already.
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Tyson should just get juiced and drugged out of his mind like a race horse.... go out with a bang... Why not?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39212
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
lemme guess laurence cole reffing this
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: jake paul vs mike tyson
Who or what is sanctioning this bout?