jake paul vs mike tyson

dickbelden
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 767
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45

jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by dickbelden »

just read 16 ounce gloves ? is this true ?
Perkin Warbeck
Super Featherweight
Posts: 1887
Joined: 25 Jun 2018, 19:53

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by Perkin Warbeck »

Perhaps if Jake Paul gets past Mike Tyson, he'll take on Clint Eastwood.

JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by JCS »

dickbelden wrote: 31 Mar 2024, 20:55 just read 16 ounce gloves ? is this true ?
Apparently that is true IF it is deemed an exhibition...

I read the camps are pushing for a legit sanctioned bout. WTF knows?
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9007
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by Syntax Error »

I don't think this fight will happen.

If I am wrong and it does happen, I think it will be heavily choreographed.

There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring, particularly against opponents 30 years younger: The Spectre of Holyfield should loom large of this event.

He was also 58 when he fought his exhibition against Belfort, who was a mere 14 years younger, but Evander still fell apart like slow cooked brisket when Vitor slightly upped the ante in their fight.
AngryGoon38
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 14:51

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by AngryGoon38 »

Syntax Error wrote: 01 Apr 2024, 12:01 I don't think this fight will happen.

If I am wrong and it does happen, I think it will be heavily choreographed.

There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring, particularly against opponents 30 years younger: The Spectre of Holyfield should loom large of this event.

He was also 58 when he fought his exhibition against Belfort, who was a mere 14 years younger, but Evander still fell apart like slow cooked brisket when Vitor slightly upped the ante in their fight.
Yeah, you're points obviously make sense. It really is common sense. At least to people with proper perception to reality.

Mike Tyson Should Not be having this bout. He has nothing to prove. At least we "Real Actual" boxing fans feel this way.

The "Casual type Boxing Fans" are of course mesmerized. They always are when they really shouldn't be.

There is a pretty strong likelihood that this won't end well.

Could Mike win..???

I actually believe so, but then what..?!?!

Jake just cares about money.

Seriously disappointed with him.

I thought he was better than this.... :confused:
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

Syntax Error wrote: 01 Apr 2024, 12:01 I don't think this fight will happen.

If I am wrong and it does happen, I think it will be heavily choreographed.

There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring, particularly against opponents 30 years younger: The Spectre of Holyfield should loom large of this event.

He was also 58 when he fought his exhibition against Belfort, who was a mere 14 years younger, but Evander still fell apart like slow cooked brisket when Vitor slightly upped the ante in their fight.
Evander was told it would be like a sparring session. He was bamboozled by the promoters and caught off guard completely when belfort came out firing
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by apollo creed »

Another exihibition fight for big money. I don't care about it. Why not against David Tua, who is in great shape ? :box:
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9007
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by Syntax Error »

Interesting article. :TU:

Looks like Holyfield was tricked, but it just further emphasises that men of his age shouldn't be anywhere near boxing rings, especially against much younger guys who have combat sport grounding.

Holyfield had the balance of a newborn giraffe and was slower than Windows 95 and just couldn't respond when Belfort upped the ante.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by Lackeos »

Syntax Error wrote: 01 Apr 2024, 12:01 There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring
Well he did fight 3.5 years ago. I honestly think Tyson looks better in recent years than he did in 2005
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5852
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by p4p1 »

Lackeos wrote: 03 Apr 2024, 20:17
Syntax Error wrote: 01 Apr 2024, 12:01 There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring
Well he did fight 3.5 years ago. I honestly think Tyson looks better in recent years than he did in 2005
You don't think that might be because he was fighting another old man?
AngryGoon38 wrote: 01 Apr 2024, 15:29
Syntax Error wrote: 01 Apr 2024, 12:01 I don't think this fight will happen.

If I am wrong and it does happen, I think it will be heavily choreographed.

There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring, particularly against opponents 30 years younger: The Spectre of Holyfield should loom large of this event.

He was also 58 when he fought his exhibition against Belfort, who was a mere 14 years younger, but Evander still fell apart like slow cooked brisket when Vitor slightly upped the ante in their fight.
Yeah, you're points obviously make sense. It really is common sense. At least to people with proper perception to reality.

Mike Tyson Should Not be having this bout. He has nothing to prove. At least we "Real Actual" boxing fans feel this way.

The "Casual type Boxing Fans" are of course mesmerized. They always are when they really shouldn't be.

There is a pretty strong likelihood that this won't end well.

Could Mike win..???

I actually believe so, but then what..?!?!

Jake just cares about money.

Seriously disappointed with him.

I thought he was better than this.... :confused:
The saddest thing is that so many people think that Tyson is going to go through him like a buzzsaw. Tyson couldn't do that to journeymen 20 years ago. Jake Paul might not be an elite fighter, or even at a McBride/Williams level but he isn't embarrassingly bad, takes it seriously and looks like he is improving with each fight.

I would love an old Mike to give him a lesson, but I personally just don't see it.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Lackeos wrote: 03 Apr 2024, 20:17
Syntax Error wrote: 01 Apr 2024, 12:01 There's no way a 58 year old should be in the ring
Well he did fight 3.5 years ago. I honestly think Tyson looks better in recent years than he did in 2005
That was an exhibition, not a fight, two old duffers having a body spar.

Tyson's shot to bits, has been for well over a decade.

This fight is an exhibition - neither man will try to hurt the other.
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by apollo creed »

why so much talk about a sparring-show made to generate huge numbers ? boxing has became wwe. :doh:
NateJR
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 19:58

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by NateJR »

Irresponsible in the first degree by all involved in this fight.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4453
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by NazNaci1 »

The thing that bugs me is that I think this clown, Paul, will actually try to KO Mike.

Total tool for taking this match and challenging a great, former Champ in his advanced years. As mentioned, Holyfield was used and abused and would hate the same for Mike.
dickbelden
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 767
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by dickbelden »

now they are saying 16 ounce gloves & 2 minute rounds---so so pathetic !
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9007
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by Syntax Error »

dickbelden wrote: 14 Apr 2024, 09:51 now they are saying 16 ounce gloves & 2 minute rounds---so so pathetic !
I can understand that.

Tyson can't do 3 minute rounds at his age.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46253
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by gilgamesh »

dickbelden wrote: 14 Apr 2024, 09:51 now they are saying 16 ounce gloves & 2 minute rounds---so so pathetic !
Plus no judges so it's an Automatic draw should it go the distance. Which means there's no longer any result possible except Automatic Draw.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by JCS »

Today, ESPN announced that this will be a sanctioned pro fight.... but only 2-minute rounds and w/ 14 oz gloves.
Sendo Takeshi
Flyweight
Posts: 841
Joined: 23 Dec 2023, 15:07

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by Sendo Takeshi »

14 oz gloves and 8x2 min rounds..
What kind of pro fight is that?

It's only sanctioned because they know it would make more money than an exhibition.
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5885
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by joshj909 »

JCS wrote: 29 Apr 2024, 12:17 Today, ESPN announced that this will be a sanctioned pro fight.... but only 2-minute rounds and w/ 14 oz gloves.
Mike's deluded if he thinks he will win. He was crap 20 years ago. Only thing he's going to get out of this is money and head trauma. He has enough of both already.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46253
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by gilgamesh »

JCS wrote: 29 Apr 2024, 12:17 Today, ESPN announced that this will be a sanctioned pro fight.... but only 2-minute rounds and w/ 14 oz gloves.
Did they say how many rounds?

EDIT: Nevermind. I see it's 8.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by JCS »

Tyson should just get juiced and drugged out of his mind like a race horse.... go out with a bang... Why not?
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39212
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by margaret thatcher »

lemme guess laurence cole reffing this
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9007
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: jake paul vs mike tyson

Post by Syntax Error »

Who or what is sanctioning this bout?
Post Reply