Tyson Fury … how good is he?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39212
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
go back a few years to when he was fighting otto wallin?
what did he do there that he cant do now?
its feasible that fury has slowed some, but same for usyk, he's 2 years older than fury and struggled majorly with injury
what did he do there that he cant do now?
its feasible that fury has slowed some, but same for usyk, he's 2 years older than fury and struggled majorly with injury
Last edited by margaret thatcher on 19 May 2024, 19:03, edited 1 time in total.
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3152
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Otter beats rabbit.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
There's always that guy that for whatever reason is just all wrong for you. Jack Dempsey for instance had "Fat" Willie Meehan. Who he couldn't find the answer for.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 18:57i agree, although many people think differentlygilgamesh wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 18:46In fairness. Nobody is beating everyone in history.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 05:13 agree he hasnt been good to his body though. i do think he managed to find close to his best form however
fury is a handful in any era, but defo not beating everyone in history
if you go through the records even of most greats, you'll find many hiccups along the way. when people talk mythical fights there's a tendency to way overdo the extreme, 'he smashes them all' / beats them all type outcomes. but in reality there are plenty of cases of very good fighters losing to b level guys, then beating elite opponents, and all sorts of in between.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39212
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
ya true, otters can be vicious adorable things
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3152
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
I strongly disagree with those who consider this a poor era of HW boxing. On the contrary, this is a strong era. It has been for about 5 years:
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Are you serious?ironbeard wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:09 I strongly disagree with those who consider this a poor era of HW boxing. On the contrary, this is a strong era. It has been for about 5 years:
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
This absolutely is one of the better eras of Heavyweight Boxing in my opinion. If the 70's and 90's are the Holy grail...and they are. Then the era from like 2016 to now has been as good as any other that I can think of honestly.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:12Are you serious?ironbeard wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:09 I strongly disagree with those who consider this a poor era of HW boxing. On the contrary, this is a strong era. It has been for about 5 years:
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.
I mean do you honestly think these guys are tougher than Joe Louis' opponents during his reign? You think these guys couldn't handle Archie Moore or Ezzard Charles during Marciano's era?
I do believe objectively that this is one of the best eras of Heavyweights certainly of the last 100 years.
It is a superior Heavyweight division overall than the one that was going on when I first started following the sport in the 2000's, and it's better than it was throughout Wladimir's reign. Wladimir was a great Champion, but he didn't have a contender pool this deep to fight against unfortunately.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32676
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
That list is piss poor outside the top 3 names.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Does that not go for most eras though?
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32676
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Alright. Rocky Marciano's title defenses were against Ezzard Charles and Archie Moore, Roland Lastarza. Guys like that. You think Joe Joyce couldn't beat some of those guys? And he's like what....the 15th best right now?Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:36Not necessarily, I'd say there's usually a lot more depth. Admittedly this is much better than the 2000s which was diabolical.
Ingemar Johansson. Former Heavyweight Champion. You think Daniel Dubois couldn't mop the floor with him?
Trevor Berbick. A Champion in the 80's. Joseph Parker is at least that good, if not better.
Point is, the guys that are quite a few notches down the ladder right now are conceivable as being a threat in a different time.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Absolutely.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:12Are you serious?ironbeard wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:09 I strongly disagree with those who consider this a poor era of HW boxing. On the contrary, this is a strong era. It has been for about 5 years:
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.
Usyk, Fury, AJ, Parker, and Hrgovic would compete well in any era.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32676
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Ezzard Charles vs Joe Joyce would be really interesting actuallygilgamesh wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:39Alright. Rocky Marciano's title defenses were against Ezzard Charles and Archie Moore, Roland Lastarza. Guys like that. You think Joe Joyce couldn't beat some of those guys? And he's like what....the 15th best right now?Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:36Not necessarily, I'd say there's usually a lot more depth. Admittedly this is much better than the 2000s which was diabolical.
Ingemar Johansson. Former Heavyweight Champion. You think Daniel Dubois couldn't mop the floor with him?
Trevor Berbick. A Champion in the 80's. Joseph Parker is at least that good, if not better.
Point is, the guys that are quite a few notches down the ladder right now are conceivable as being a threat in a different time.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
White, Parker, Hrgovic, Kayabel, Dubois, Joyce, Anderson, and even Wilder would be competitive in the top 15 in pretty much any era.
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3152
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
It's a superficially deep era, with too little cross-pollination to make informed calls on where the majority place. After Usyk the heavyweight rankings are wide open.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
I understand your point but it is disregarding today’s reality, imo. It was accurate not so long ago but now we have Kabayel v Sanchez, Parker v Zhang and Wilderand anyone else who will get in the ring with him., Wilder v Zhang, Dubois v Hrgovic, Joyce v Parker and Zhang.Grilling Machine wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 21:18 It's a superficially deep era, with too little cross-pollination to make informed calls on where the majority place. After Usyk the heavyweight rankings are wide open.
Largely, we have The Absolute Monarchy to thank for the resurgence of the HW div “cross pollination.”
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
There are a few more coming through now, but there's still loads of old stagers in the top of the rankings.ironbeard wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 08:44I understand your point but it is disregarding today’s reality, imo. It was accurate not so long ago but now we have Kabayel v Sanchez, Parker v Zhang and Wilderand anyone else who will get in the ring with him., Wilder v Zhang, Dubois v Hrgovic, Joyce v Parker and Zhang.Grilling Machine wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 21:18 It's a superficially deep era, with too little cross-pollination to make informed calls on where the majority place. After Usyk the heavyweight rankings are wide open.
Largely, we have The Absolute Monarchy to thank for the resurgence of the HW div “cross pollination.”
What worries me is guys like Anderson - why is he fighting so infrequently, at this stage in his career? He's only managed 3 fight in 2023, and one so far this year. He doesn't seem that committed.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
It really isn’t.ironbeard wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:09 I strongly disagree with those who consider this a poor era of HW boxing. On the contrary, this is a strong era. It has been for about 5 years:
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.
“Possibly Win belts in any era?” Possibly is the word there but,
Who and what era?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
I think the fact that 42 year Zhang is at the top of the sport speaks volumes. Wilder too - he managed to win belts because of a lack of decent skills in the division.si7dog7 wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 11:25It really isn’t.ironbeard wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:09 I strongly disagree with those who consider this a poor era of HW boxing. On the contrary, this is a strong era. It has been for about 5 years:
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.
“Possibly Win belts in any era?” Possibly is the word there but,
Who and what era?
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Jamesjamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 11:31I think the fact that 42 year Zhang is at the top of the sport speaks volumes. Wilder too - he managed to win belts because of a lack of decent skills in the division.si7dog7 wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 11:25It really isn’t.ironbeard wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:09 I strongly disagree with those who consider this a poor era of HW boxing. On the contrary, this is a strong era. It has been for about 5 years:
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.
“Possibly Win belts in any era?” Possibly is the word there but,
Who and what era?
Common sense.
How this is a stacked division I don’t know.
There are fights we wanna see.
Outta that rogues gallery.
Fury v AJ
Wilder v AJ
Anderson v Dubois. (If he gets past Hrg)
Then I’m struggling.
Still hope Usyk retires though. 37. Done it. Adios Chico.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Yeah, I mean, not a lot of evidence to suggest Anderson is anything more than Michael Grant - he doesn't seem to have the hunger, I mean he's already been talking about retirement FFS, he's not even achieved anything yet!si7dog7 wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 11:38Jamesjamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 11:31I think the fact that 42 year Zhang is at the top of the sport speaks volumes. Wilder too - he managed to win belts because of a lack of decent skills in the division.
Common sense.
How this is a stacked division I don’t know.
There are fights we wanna see.
Outta that rogues gallery.
Fury v AJ
Wilder v AJ
Anderson v Dubois. (If he gets past Hrg)
Then I’m struggling.
Still hope Usyk retires though. 37. Done it. Adios Chico.
Wilder is what, 37, AJ turns 35 shortly i think. Usyk 37. Dubois is young, but limited, and I think will lose every time he faces someone who can box a bit. I mean he made Joyce look like fckng Willie Pep.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
I think he is.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:12Are you serious?ironbeard wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:09 I strongly disagree with those who consider this a poor era of HW boxing. On the contrary, this is a strong era. It has been for about 5 years:
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9152
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Dubois still fairly inexperienced considering he didn’t have much of a senior amateur career. Joyce was his first big test. His confidence seems to be building and still to hit his physical prime. He will be up there when the others retire.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 11:55Yeah, I mean, not a lot of evidence to suggest Anderson is anything more than Michael Grant - he doesn't seem to have the hunger, I mean he's already been talking about retirement FFS, he's not even achieved anything yet!si7dog7 wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 11:38Jamesjamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 11:31
I think the fact that 42 year Zhang is at the top of the sport speaks volumes. Wilder too - he managed to win belts because of a lack of decent skills in the division.
Common sense.
How this is a stacked division I don’t know.
There are fights we wanna see.
Outta that rogues gallery.
Fury v AJ
Wilder v AJ
Anderson v Dubois. (If he gets past Hrg)
Then I’m struggling.
Still hope Usyk retires though. 37. Done it. Adios Chico.
Wilder is what, 37, AJ turns 35 shortly i think. Usyk 37. Dubois is young, but limited, and I think will lose every time he faces someone who can box a bit. I mean he made Joyce look like fckng Willie Pep.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Oh dear. C’mon Ironbeard. Are you? Serious that is?jwfg wrote: ↑20 May 2024, 11:58I think he is.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:12Are you serious?ironbeard wrote: ↑19 May 2024, 19:09 I strongly disagree with those who consider this a poor era of HW boxing. On the contrary, this is a strong era. It has been for about 5 years:
Usyk
Fury
AJ
Parker
Hrgovic
Zhang
Kabayel
Anderson
Dubois
Wilder
Joyce
Ajagba
Bakole
Sanchez
Ruiz Jr
Huni
Whyte
It is a relatively deep HW div. The top end has more than a handful of fighters who could compete and possibly win belts in any era.