PompeyScot wrote:Jeez, I don't post very often but read the forum nearly every day, but had to contribute to this.
I can't believe that people are having a go at Witter because of the way he won a WBC World title! It used to be a matter of any fighter who did that would be praised to the high heavens, no matter what, has the spread of various world titles had that big an effect?
I really think you're doing Witter a disservice James, and comparing how he beat Corley to the way Mayweather did is complete madness. Mayweather is the P4P number one, and Witter is, and never will be, nowhere near that. Not many fighters will be. To compare the two is laughable.
Sure, Witter wasn't pretty, but he was damn effective. The bottom line is he won a major world title, outboxed a good American fighter who had only lost to top fighters, won by a wide points margin and had Corley in trouble at times during the fight, it's not as if he danced and ran all night.
I just wish some people would put their dislike of Witter aside for one moment to celebrate a British world title win. For too long we've had people having a go at fighters for settling for WBU and WBO rubbish. Well, we've got a fighter last night who wanted a major title and went out and got one, yet people are still having a go at him. Seeing Witter during his interview clutching the belt and constantly looking at it was a great sight. I've never been a massive Witter fan myself but can appreciate the fight he fought last night, but it's clear that there's some people in this thread who will just refuse to give him any credit at all. He's British, he's a major world title holder, I say well done Junior.
Why are you rating the WBC above other bodies, they are just a label, for TV companies, the product of corrupt organisations.
The WBC title is shit, just like the rest.
Witter, who has been unimpressive in his last two fights fought for the VACANT WBC title against a guy who lost his last three major fights.
The fact that the WBC had them rated 1 & 2 shows how bent and worthless the WBC are.
Ive been saying for years that a panel of (knowledgeable) writers from Newspapers etc should form a panel and meet monthly.
They should decide the ratings one panel, an independent one at that.