why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

dickbelden
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 767
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45

why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by dickbelden »

2 minute rounds & 14 ounce gloves! this is NOT a legitimate pro fight !
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by HomicideHenry »

I personally do not see how a fight between men with 2 minute rounds and 14 ounce gloves could ever be remotely seen as a pro contest when the standard has always been 3 minute rounds since 1865 and 10 ounce gloves being the standard since the 1980s.

It would be a disgrace for the website to count it as a pro fight. If that's the case then all these matches being held in Tijuana (ie, Bryant Pappas) ought to be listed as pro fights even though BoxRec sees them as unsanctioned.

Jesus Christ Almighty God bless you all
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6050
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by goose 5 »

Lots of pro bouts have used 2 minute rounds for men. 4 an 6 round bouts in England use 2 minute rounds, sometimes. Several of Willie Pastrano and Ralph Dupas fights used 2 minute rounds in Florida in the 1950's. In Canada, 2 minute rounds were used even in the early 80's.
The 14 ounce gloves are far more problematic.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39212
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

its quite interesting how formats and rules vary around the world

japan has started doing lots of 5 round fights i notice. north/south america have had a lot of 9 and 11 rounders.

some events have used overtime rounds to break a draw

i think it was italy or somewhere in europe where for a bit fights that are today majority draws (so 2 judges score draw, 1 scores it for fighter a) would be a win for fighter a



what counts as pro is a technicality that varies by area. of course texas doesnt usually do mens pro fights with 2 minutes and 14 ounce gloves, this is obviously special treatment, but they probably have wiggle room to shift things as they see fit
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100866
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

I guess as long as it's sanctioned, then it's gonna be listed.

I do agree with the fights and cards that not being listed, like the Tijuana ones.
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6860
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by chinarich »

It's sanctioned as a professional contest by a recognised sanctioning body so it's a professional fight. Sweden has 2 minute rounds for their pro bouts, I think. The rules have been set, it would be strange for BoxRec not to list it just because it doesn't adhere to the 3 minute norm for round length.
dickbelden2
Bantamweight
Posts: 38
Joined: 21 Aug 2021, 16:13

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by dickbelden2 »

chinarich wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 06:53 It's sanctioned as a professional contest by a recognised sanctioning body so it's a professional fight. Sweden has 2 minute rounds for their pro bouts, I think. The rules have been set, it would be strange for BoxRec not to list it just because it doesn't adhere to the 3 minute norm for round length.
the major problem is the 14 ounce gloves---does anybody think this is OK?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100866
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

dickbelden2 wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 09:25
chinarich wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 06:53 It's sanctioned as a professional contest by a recognised sanctioning body so it's a professional fight. Sweden has 2 minute rounds for their pro bouts, I think. The rules have been set, it would be strange for BoxRec not to list it just because it doesn't adhere to the 3 minute norm for round length.
the major problem is the 14 ounce gloves---does anybody think this is OK?
too light
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9426
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by tiny_acres »

If Tyson some how wins this fight. Where will Boxrecs computer ratings rate him?
CMCanavessi
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 27 Apr 2021, 10:06

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by CMCanavessi »

margaret thatcher wrote: 13 Nov 2024, 21:52 north/south america have had a lot of 9 and 11 rounders.
I'm from South America (Argentina) and I have never ever seen a 9 or 11 round fight. Actually, I haven't even heard anything like that. Not saying it doesn't exist, but at least here is not normal at all.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46247
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by gilgamesh »

margaret thatcher wrote: 13 Nov 2024, 21:52 its quite interesting how formats and rules vary around the world

japan has started doing lots of 5 round fights i notice. north/south america have had a lot of 9 and 11 rounders.

some events have used overtime rounds to break a draw

i think it was italy or somewhere in europe where for a bit fights that are today majority draws (so 2 judges score draw, 1 scores it for fighter a) would be a win for fighter a



what counts as pro is a technicality that varies by area. of course texas doesnt usually do mens pro fights with 2 minutes and 14 ounce gloves, this is obviously special treatment, but they probably have wiggle room to shift things as they see fit
And obviously 58 year old former World Champions don't typically Box anyone, anywhere :lol:

It was sanctioned as a Pro Fight for marketing purposes. Exhibitions, no matter who's in them only do so well. The fact that this will be a fight that goes on their record, makes it infinitely more intriguing, and probably 3 to 4 times as profitable.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46247
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by gilgamesh »

tiny_acres wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 13:00 If Tyson some how wins this fight. Where will Boxrecs computer ratings rate him?
I don't suspect this will enhance the ranking of either participant. A boost to the star power sure. A boost to the ranking? No.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39212
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by margaret thatcher »

CMCanavessi wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 14:12
margaret thatcher wrote: 13 Nov 2024, 21:52 north/south america have had a lot of 9 and 11 rounders.
I'm from South America (Argentina) and I have never ever seen a 9 or 11 round fight. Actually, I haven't even heard anything like that. Not saying it doesn't exist, but at least here is not normal at all.
ya they happened regularly at least a couple years ago, 9 round fights too, some examples from dominican rep, panama, venezuela, nicargua, and argentina

https://boxrec.com/en/event/759272

https://boxrec.com/en/event/792663

https://boxrec.com/en/event/718812

https://boxrec.com/en/event/725903

https://boxrec.com/en/event/768003/2243091

https://boxrec.com/en/event/765000

https://boxrec.com/en/event/717230
CMCanavessi
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 27 Apr 2021, 10:06

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by CMCanavessi »

margaret thatcher wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 14:28
CMCanavessi wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 14:12
margaret thatcher wrote: 13 Nov 2024, 21:52 north/south america have had a lot of 9 and 11 rounders.
I'm from South America (Argentina) and I have never ever seen a 9 or 11 round fight. Actually, I haven't even heard anything like that. Not saying it doesn't exist, but at least here is not normal at all.
ya they happened regularly at least a couple years ago, 9 round fights too, some examples from dominican rep, panama, venezuela, nicargua, and argentina

https://boxrec.com/en/event/759272

https://boxrec.com/en/event/792663

https://boxrec.com/en/event/718812

https://boxrec.com/en/event/725903

https://boxrec.com/en/event/768003/2243091

https://boxrec.com/en/event/765000

https://boxrec.com/en/event/717230
Damn, that is so weird
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5885
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by joshj909 »

margaret thatcher wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 14:28
CMCanavessi wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 14:12
margaret thatcher wrote: 13 Nov 2024, 21:52 north/south america have had a lot of 9 and 11 rounders.
I'm from South America (Argentina) and I have never ever seen a 9 or 11 round fight. Actually, I haven't even heard anything like that. Not saying it doesn't exist, but at least here is not normal at all.
ya they happened regularly at least a couple years ago, 9 round fights too, some examples from dominican rep, panama, venezuela, nicargua, and argentina

https://boxrec.com/en/event/759272

https://boxrec.com/en/event/792663

https://boxrec.com/en/event/718812

https://boxrec.com/en/event/725903

https://boxrec.com/en/event/768003/2243091

https://boxrec.com/en/event/765000

https://boxrec.com/en/event/717230
I have always wondered how this would effect scoring. In MMA they fight an odd number of rounds to reduce the amount of draws, there are still draws but you'd think less of them. I wonder how that would play out in boxing.
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15476
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by giacomino »

It’’s a circus act. Not sure how any of Paul’s “Fights” are taken seriously
dawudboxer
Super Welterweight
Posts: 204
Joined: 01 Feb 2014, 05:33

Tyson vs Paul - why are you recording it on their records?

Post by dawudboxer »

Why is it that a bout that has 2 minute round length and they are wearing massive gloves is being sanctioned and counts on their record? Its pathetic and Boxrec should be making a stand against the fight not endorsing it.
RScarf1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1418
Joined: 18 Aug 2005, 22:31

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by RScarf1 »

It was originally going to be an exhibition bout, but the promoter asked the Texas commission if it could be sanctioned with the two minute rounds and larger ounce gloves. The Texas commission allowed it to be sanctioned and therefore has to go on their official records.
JDC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2963
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 21:24

Re: Tyson vs Paul - why are you recording it on their records?

Post by JDC »

Boxrec records santioned fights. What do you expect them to do? Hold a dubious fights commity meeting on all debatable fights? Or just record them for what they are...

What's the issue?
dawudboxer
Super Welterweight
Posts: 204
Joined: 01 Feb 2014, 05:33

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by dawudboxer »

tiny_acres wrote: 14 Nov 2024, 13:00 If Tyson some how wins this fight. Where will Boxrecs computer ratings rate him?
Probably make him number one behind Usyk and rank him as the greatest of all time
dawudboxer
Super Welterweight
Posts: 204
Joined: 01 Feb 2014, 05:33

Re: Tyson vs Paul - why are you recording it on their records?

Post by dawudboxer »

JDC wrote: 15 Nov 2024, 18:15 Boxrec records santioned fights. What do you expect them to do? Hold a dubious fights commity meeting on all debatable fights? Or just record them for what they are...

What's the issue?
There are many fighters who box legit bouts with legit commissions and boxrec refuses to put those fights on their record, just because they have something against that commission. Yet this shit they allow.

Ashley Theophane, Danny Williams, Prince Patel have all had a few wins abroad that boxrec doesn’t include for no good reason. They need to mark this as an exhibition. Also add on the fact that Jake Paul was clearly taking it easy on him.
dawudboxer
Super Welterweight
Posts: 204
Joined: 01 Feb 2014, 05:33

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by dawudboxer »

RScarf1 wrote: 15 Nov 2024, 17:35 It was originally going to be an exhibition bout, but the promoter asked the Texas commission if it could be sanctioned with the two minute rounds and larger ounce gloves. The Texas commission allowed it to be sanctioned and therefore has to go on their official records.
Boxrec doesn’t need to accept it. Even the fact that they accept the fights on Tommy Morrisons record when he was clearly HIV positive is a joke.
dawudboxer
Super Welterweight
Posts: 204
Joined: 01 Feb 2014, 05:33

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by dawudboxer »

After a certain age they shouldn’t count fights on the record. Now Holyfield vs Belfort was a real fight with real punches thrown but it didn’t count on the record. Most of KSI’s fights haven’t counted as real pro fights. Why should Mike have a 7th loss on his record when he had a mangled knee, looked off color all week looking very ill, and is 58. I think the only chance of boxrec taking this off the record is if Mike tests positive for weed.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46247
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by gilgamesh »

Does it really matter? Does that 1 more loss on Mike's record bring his historical standing down any? If it does...that's actually good. He's somebody that's been put on a pedestal that he didn't belong on for far too long honestly, but I don't think this hurts the way people see him any. The only thing it changes is how much more money is in his bank account, and given the amount that is, I'd say it was more than a worthwhile tradeoff.
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: why is boxrec.com listing the jake paul vs mike tyson fight ?

Post by tigermoth87 »

Boxing is shit now. They might as well start putting WWE matches on if they're including this fake fight
Post Reply