The future of boxing on Sky Sports

TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5157
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by TheLeprechaun »

When you have Lauren Price and Tasha Jonas fights being main events and pushed out as blockbusters then you can see why Sky has packed boxing in. Shalom was the modern day Audley. Aud ruined boxing on BBC, Shalom ruined it on Sky.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28404
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by Coco »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 06:27 When you have Lauren Price and Tasha Jonas fights being main events and pushed out as blockbusters then you can see why Sky has packed boxing in. Shalom was the modern day Audley. Aud ruined boxing on BBC, Shalom ruined it on Sky.
This
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16931
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by keithmoonhangover »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 06:27 When you have Lauren Price and Tasha Jonas fights being main events and pushed out as blockbusters then you can see why Sky has packed boxing in. Shalom was the modern day Audley. Aud ruined boxing on BBC, Shalom ruined it on Sky.
They're not going anywhere. I'll take a bet with you that SKY are showing boxing before the end of the year.
Last edited by keithmoonhangover on 21 Jun 2025, 18:12, edited 1 time in total.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3339
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by Twinkle Toes »

I would expect a dedicated sports channel to show some amount of boxing, but it does look like the days of exclusivity for promoters on a platform such as SKY is over for now.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39300
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by margaret thatcher »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 06:27 When you have Lauren Price and Tasha Jonas fights being main events and pushed out as blockbusters then you can see why Sky has packed boxing in. Shalom was the modern day Audley. Aud ruined boxing on BBC, Shalom ruined it on Sky.
the legacy of ben shalom, spending his budget on women's main events no one was pushing for
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3327
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

margaret thatcher wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 15:33
TheLeprechaun wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 06:27 When you have Lauren Price and Tasha Jonas fights being main events and pushed out as blockbusters then you can see why Sky has packed boxing in. Shalom was the modern day Audley. Aud ruined boxing on BBC, Shalom ruined it on Sky.
the legacy of ben shalom, spending his budget on women's main events no one was pushing for
I'm no fan of Ben but he was just giving Sky what they wanted. They followed the BBC's lead in trying to feminise televised sport as much as they could. Tbf they've some way to go to match the BBC's lunacy - i switched on test match special recently to find two women talking to each other
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16931
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by keithmoonhangover »

CaptainSpacerod wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 23:25 i switched on test match special recently to find two women talking to each other
Imagine it, two females daring to talk about cricket. How could they possibly be able to comment on thirteen blokes on a field with a bat and ball. How dare they. Absolutely disgraceful behaviour. They'll have men commentating on the women's sports next. What has the world come to? :OhYes:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28404
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by Coco »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 06:46
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 23:25 i switched on test match special recently to find two women talking to each other
Imagine it, two females daring to talk about cricket. How could they possibly be able to comment on thirteen blokes on a field with a bat and ball. How dare they. Absolutely disgraceful behaviour. They'll have men commentating on the women's sports next. What has the world come to? :OhYes:
Then there would be uproar and quite rightly so.

I'm looking forward to the team they are putting together for transexuales events
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16931
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Coco wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 07:49 Then there would be uproar and quite rightly so.
I was being sarcastic. Men do commentate on women's sporting events. I can't understand why anyone would have any issues on humans commentating on humans doing sport.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28404
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by Coco »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 07:54
Coco wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 07:49 Then there would be uproar and quite rightly so.
I was being sarcastic. Men do commentate on women's sporting events. I can't understand why anyone would have any issues on humans commentating on humans doing sport.
You were being sarcastic????? No way, that went right over my head...
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16931
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Coco wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 08:34
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 07:54
Coco wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 07:49 Then there would be uproar and quite rightly so.
I was being sarcastic. Men do commentate on women's sporting events. I can't understand why anyone would have any issues on humans commentating on humans doing sport.
You were being sarcastic????? No way, that went right over my head...
:oops:
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3327
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 06:46
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 23:25 i switched on test match special recently to find two women talking to each other
Imagine it, two females daring to talk about cricket. How could they possibly be able to comment on thirteen blokes on a field with a bat and ball. How dare they. Absolutely disgraceful behaviour. They'll have men commentating on the women's sports next. What has the world come to? :OhYes:
Women on TMS are as incongruous as say Michael Portillo appearing in a drill video. As a diligent professional Michael may well have done his research on lyrics and what posture to adopt and what clothes to wear but he’d still look out of place,

And the same goes for the ladies on TMS
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16931
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by keithmoonhangover »

CaptainSpacerod wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:17
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 06:46
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 23:25 i switched on test match special recently to find two women talking to each other
Imagine it, two females daring to talk about cricket. How could they possibly be able to comment on thirteen blokes on a field with a bat and ball. How dare they. Absolutely disgraceful behaviour. They'll have men commentating on the women's sports next. What has the world come to? :OhYes:
Women on TMS are as incongruous as say Michael Portillo appearing in a drill video. As a diligent professional Michael may well have done his research on lyrics and what posture to adopt and what clothes to wear but he’d still look out of place,

And the same goes for the ladies on TMS
:doh:
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10150
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by samwbr »

CaptainSpacerod wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:17
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 06:46
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 23:25 i switched on test match special recently to find two women talking to each other
Imagine it, two females daring to talk about cricket. How could they possibly be able to comment on thirteen blokes on a field with a bat and ball. How dare they. Absolutely disgraceful behaviour. They'll have men commentating on the women's sports next. What has the world come to? :OhYes:
Women on TMS are as incongruous as say Michael Portillo appearing in a drill video. As a diligent professional Michael may well have done his research on lyrics and what posture to adopt and what clothes to wear but he’d still look out of place,

And the same goes for the ladies on TMS
Mel Jones on Sky is one if the best in their line up.
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1954
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by liamlion »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 06:46
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 23:25 i switched on test match special recently to find two women talking to each other
Imagine it, two females daring to talk about cricket. How could they possibly be able to comment on thirteen blokes on a field with a bat and ball. How dare they. Absolutely disgraceful behaviour. They'll have men commentating on the women's sports next. What has the world come to? :OhYes:
…thirteen blokes on a field with a bat and ball… drives huge subscriptions for Sky and thus huge money. A large number of the subscribers that watch cricket will be male.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable for viewers to expect that the people giving expert analysis have at least played in the arena, in such competitions and have experience of the environment they’re commenting on.

Perhaps women expert analysers can’t accurately comment about men’s cricket as it is very different to the way women’s cricket is played. One such example is that women players don’t know what it’s like to face a 90mph bowler or the pressure of playing in front of a full capacity. To that extent, perhaps the women expert analysers aren’t particularly qualified to talk about Men’s cricket and the specific nuances that come with playing the game at that level, as they simply haven’t experienced it…

Are they expert on women’s cricket? Yes, absolutely.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16931
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by keithmoonhangover »

liamlion wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:50 Are they expert on women’s cricket? Yes, absolutely.
It's the same sport. :o
Jimmy2025
Light Flyweight
Posts: 1215
Joined: 22 Dec 2024, 06:53

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by Jimmy2025 »

I used to attend live sport to get away from the women in my life for a few hours. Women at sport kills the dynamic and atmosphere (for men).

Female commentators and hosts are just as capable and often better than the males but they are still women. Men and women are different. Men need time to be men by themselves.
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1954
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by liamlion »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:58
liamlion wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:50 Are they expert on women’s cricket? Yes, absolutely.
It's the same sport. :o
…Played at totally different levels… and that’s why some reject certain analysers as they can talk about cricket but not with insight and first hand hand experience of having played at the elite level themselves.

A bit like why you don’t have ex non-league male players working as pundits on SKY for the premier league coverage. Technically it’s the same game but those non-league players can’t tell you what it’s like playing, for example, in a Liverpool-United match in front of 74,000 at Old Trafford. They aren’t expert at that level. They are outside observers and can’t give insight based on having been there and done it.

Not an issue for some, sure. But an issue for others. :o
Jimmy2025
Light Flyweight
Posts: 1215
Joined: 22 Dec 2024, 06:53

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by Jimmy2025 »

liamlion wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 15:12
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:58
liamlion wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:50 Are they expert on women’s cricket? Yes, absolutely.
It's the same sport. :o
…Played at totally different levels… and that’s why some reject certain analysers as they can talk about cricket but not with insight and first hand hand experience of having played at the elite level themselves.

A bit like why you don’t have ex non-league male players working as pundits on SKY for the premier league coverage. Technically it’s the same game but those non-league players can’t tell you what it’s like playing, for example, in a Liverpool-United match in front of 74,000 at Old Trafford. They aren’t expert at that level. They are outside observers and can’t give insight based on having been there and done it.

Not an issue for some, sure. But an issue for others. :o
It's not about the level they played at. It's their sex. Blowers made TMS what it was for decades and his First Class career was back in the days when Cambs University were classed as First Class.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16931
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by keithmoonhangover »

liamlion wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 15:12
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:58
liamlion wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:50 Are they expert on women’s cricket? Yes, absolutely.
It's the same sport. :o
…Played at totally different levels… and that’s why some reject certain analysers as they can talk about cricket but not with insight and first hand hand experience of having played at the elite level themselves.

A bit like why you don’t have ex non-league male players working as pundits on SKY for the premier league coverage. Technically it’s the same game but those non-league players can’t tell you what it’s like playing, for example, in a Liverpool-United match in front of 74,000 at Old Trafford. They aren’t expert at that level. They are outside observers and can’t give insight based on having been there and done it.

Not an issue for some, sure. But an issue for others. :o
Reg Gutteridge, Harry Carpenter and Ian Darke. All top level commentators, none of them fought at the top level. Come on genius, explain it to me.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28404
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by Coco »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 17:04
liamlion wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 15:12
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:58

It's the same sport. :o
…Played at totally different levels… and that’s why some reject certain analysers as they can talk about cricket but not with insight and first hand hand experience of having played at the elite level themselves.

A bit like why you don’t have ex non-league male players working as pundits on SKY for the premier league coverage. Technically it’s the same game but those non-league players can’t tell you what it’s like playing, for example, in a Liverpool-United match in front of 74,000 at Old Trafford. They aren’t expert at that level. They are outside observers and can’t give insight based on having been there and done it.

Not an issue for some, sure. But an issue for others. :o
Reg Gutteridge, Harry Carpenter and Ian Darke. All top level commentators, none of them fought at the top level. Come on genius, explain it to me.
Talent and being around the sport for years.
Also as the front man they asked the questions rather than being the resident expert.
Experience has done nothing for Adam Smith though
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9655
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by steve689 »

maverick23 wrote: 08 Jun 2025, 02:49
Boxxer will continue on Sky but on a show by show basis I think. They’ve got fighters who have deals with Sky too (like Whittaker). I don’t know if they have enough to do many other shows outside of that with a different network.

It won’t have anything to do with Azim not fighting. I’d imagine Sky were pushing Boxxer to improve the undercard last night hence the Azim fight being added.
I think the same as this. If Sky are moving away from an exclusive deal they'll need someone still to run shows. Who else is there to turn to? Eddie and Frank are tied up on DAZN. Wasserman are out the picture, thank goodness, with Channel 5. Boxxer will be back but with limited dates. That's what I see happening.
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5955
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by joshj909 »

steve689 wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 17:20
maverick23 wrote: 08 Jun 2025, 02:49
Boxxer will continue on Sky but on a show by show basis I think. They’ve got fighters who have deals with Sky too (like Whittaker). I don’t know if they have enough to do many other shows outside of that with a different network.

It won’t have anything to do with Azim not fighting. I’d imagine Sky were pushing Boxxer to improve the undercard last night hence the Azim fight being added.
I think the same as this. If Sky are moving away from an exclusive deal they'll need someone still to run shows. Who else is there to turn to? Eddie and Frank are tied up on DAZN. Wasserman are out the picture, thank goodness, with Channel 5. Boxxer will be back but with limited dates. That's what I see happening.
If there are multiple promoters who essentially have to propose a card to Sky and Sky say yes or no to it then you think it should have better events but probably less of them.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3327
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

liamlion wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 11:50
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Jun 2025, 06:46
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 21 Jun 2025, 23:25 i switched on test match special recently to find two women talking to each other
Imagine it, two females daring to talk about cricket. How could they possibly be able to comment on thirteen blokes on a field with a bat and ball. How dare they. Absolutely disgraceful behaviour. They'll have men commentating on the women's sports next. What has the world come to? :OhYes:
…thirteen blokes on a field with a bat and ball… drives huge subscriptions for Sky and thus huge money. A large number of the subscribers that watch cricket will be male.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable for viewers to expect that the people giving expert analysis have at least played in the arena, in such competitions and have experience of the environment they’re commenting on.

Perhaps women expert analysers can’t accurately comment about men’s cricket as it is very different to the way women’s cricket is played. One such example is that women players don’t know what it’s like to face a 90mph bowler or the pressure of playing in front of a full capacity. To that extent, perhaps the women expert analysers aren’t particularly qualified to talk about Men’s cricket and the specific nuances that come with playing the game at that level, as they simply haven’t experienced it…

Are they expert on women’s cricket? Yes, absolutely.
:clap:

Thank you for explaining that much more eloquently and concisely than I could have. You’re absolutely bang on the money
Manchester Hitman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: The future of boxing on Sky Sports

Post by Manchester Hitman »

Sky have started giving Usyk - Dubois quite abit of attention recently, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they reached a deal with DAZN to be a PPV partner.

If that’s the case and they can do the same with the other Saudi/DAZN PPVs they might be happy with that, and Boxxer cards with Whitaker, Azim and Simpson if it’s an non exclusive deal.
Post Reply