Adam Smith

MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13248
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Adam Smith

Post by MightyWarrior »

Please God someone tell me the pr*ck is not commentating on Saturday nights Saudi card..

The reason he’s with DAZN, after being fired from sky for being a degenerate gambler, is Eddie owes him for giving him the keys to the kingdom, when the bonehead was heading up sky boxing: locking everyone else out and letting the fox into the chicken coop.
Spud MK2
Minimumweight
Posts: 433
Joined: 18 Oct 2025, 22:21

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Spud MK2 »

MightyWarrior wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:54 Please God someone tell me the pr*ck is not commentating on Saturday nights Saudi card..

The reason he’s with DAZN, after being fired from sky for being a degenerate gambler, is Eddie owes him for giving him the keys to the kingdom, when the bonehead was heading up sky boxing: locking everyone else out and letting the fox into the chicken coop.


read your dms
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3302
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Adam Smith

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

stujones wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:51
NazNaci1 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:05 Personal well being and successes aside, he really is awful as a commentator. He does really need to move aside but won't.

To think we had Reg, both Jim's, Harry Carpenter and this is the 'A Star' we have. To be honest, not many good ones around today. A bit of a lost art.

He is on Buncey's level and below big Ron, for me, and that is saying something.
Not for me, I like ron but for the wrong reasons. Ron is comedy value … the clock face , the Edmund Honda reference….. I love his commentary but for his Ronisms….. a bit like Jim Neilly for his cock ups “Gilbert Eastwood”
Stu, no no no :stop:

It’s true Ron does have his amusing foibles but he’s a genuine wordsmith and most of all he’s authentic …. that’s the real Ron we listen to.

With Smith we just listen to an extremely irritating cartoon character that he and his bosses have created
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3302
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Adam Smith

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

Spud MK2 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 14:05
MightyWarrior wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:54 Please God someone tell me the pr*ck is not commentating on Saturday nights Saudi card..

The reason he’s with DAZN, after being fired from sky for being a degenerate gambler, is Eddie owes him for giving him the keys to the kingdom, when the bonehead was heading up sky boxing: locking everyone else out and letting the fox into the chicken coop.


read your dms
Don’t leave the rest of us hanging Spud, spill the beans
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4448
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: Adam Smith

Post by NazNaci1 »

stujones wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:51
NazNaci1 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:05 Personal well being and successes aside, he really is awful as a commentator. He does really need to move aside but won't.

To think we had Reg, both Jim's, Harry Carpenter and this is the 'A Star' we have. To be honest, not many good ones around today. A bit of a lost art.

He is on Buncey's level and below big Ron, for me, and that is saying something.
Not for me, I like ron but for the wrong reasons. Ron is comedy value … the clock face , the Edmund Honda reference….. I love his commentary but for his Ronisms….. a bit like Jim Neilly for his cock ups “Gilbert Eastwood”
Ron is not fantastic and uses phrases like, 'Check Hook', which I can't stand, just call the punches correctly. However, he is good at reading a fighters body language, generally (ok he had no clue what had happened to Eubank, the other night), ie if a fighter takes a good shot and is a little buzzed or something, he tends to pick up on that....basically, stuff us boxing fans do.

Smith really is pretty clueless when it comes to stuff like that and he has been involved in boxing for how long.....he is just a bit of a gimmick, growling, tossing out the same phrases, and can't call a fight at all.

Neither come anywhere near someone like Steve Holdsworth.

All that said, fair play, each to their own :TU:
Last edited by NazNaci1 on 19 Nov 2025, 15:16, edited 1 time in total.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100664
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

All smith kept going on about during that main event last weekend was the bloody celebs ringside.

Production fūcked up as well because they kept showing them..

And then each time. Smith got an erection.

Was just repeating the same shit each round
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3152
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Grilling Machine »

"50 Cent. Not actually a reference to his APPEARANCE FEE."
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100664
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Grilling Machine wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 21:39 "50 Cent. Not actually a reference to his APPEARANCE FEE."
FFS!! :lol: :lol:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Adam Smith

Post by stujones »

NazNaci1 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 15:12
stujones wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:51
NazNaci1 wrote: 19 Nov 2025, 13:05 Personal well being and successes aside, he really is awful as a commentator. He does really need to move aside but won't.

To think we had Reg, both Jim's, Harry Carpenter and this is the 'A Star' we have. To be honest, not many good ones around today. A bit of a lost art.

He is on Buncey's level and below big Ron, for me, and that is saying something.
Not for me, I like ron but for the wrong reasons. Ron is comedy value … the clock face , the Edmund Honda reference….. I love his commentary but for his Ronisms….. a bit like Jim Neilly for his cock ups “Gilbert Eastwood”
Ron is not fantastic and uses phrases like, 'Check Hook', which I can't stand, just call the punches correctly. However, he is good at reading a fighters body language, generally (ok he had no clue what had happened to Eubank, the other night), ie if a fighter takes a good shot and is a little buzzed or something, he tends to pick up on that....basically, stuff us boxing fans do.

Smith really is pretty clueless when it comes to stuff like that and he has been involved in boxing for how long.....he is just a bit of a gimmick, growling, tossing out the same phrases, and can't call a fight at all.

Neither come anywhere near someone like Steve Holdsworth.

All that said, fair play, each to their own :TU:
Steve Holdsworth used to be good but the last few years he was awful. Clearly lost his interest for the sport. He commentated on a Danny Williams fight (when Danny was doing a tour of small Eastern European countries on a dodgy licence) and seemed genuinely shocked at Danny’s effort….citing “Mike Tyson “ and a non sanctioned win of Dominic Negus as a reason why Danny was still a contender!!!!
Last edited by stujones on 20 Nov 2025, 10:29, edited 1 time in total.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100664
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

I realised from the OP, this was originally an appreciation thread :lol: :doh:
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9629
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Adam Smith

Post by SeanBrennan »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 20 Nov 2025, 10:12 I realised from the OP, this was originally an appreciation thread :lol: :doh:
The thread turned heel!
Rezzer1967
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 186
Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 14:09

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Rezzer1967 »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 09 Jun 2024, 12:31
dookus wrote: 08 Jun 2024, 15:18 I don't doubt his deep and sincere love for the sport, but he will always be for me a uniquely terrible commentator
Agreed. He ruined fights with his annoying commentary again and again and I lost count of the times I had to mute it and miss out on the atmosphere. For me, I will always hate the pr*ck for that. He kept doing a job he was completely sh*t at and didn't seem to give two f*cks that he was ruining fights. He seemed drunk on his power as head of boxing and loved the commentary job and being a big shot. I have zero respect for him whatsoever. Yes he likes boxing and is a nice guy, this entire forum is full of chaps like that and we didn't get flown around the world on a hefty salary. Ruining boxing fights with his awful commentary. I'll never like the chap or give him any credit at all, sorry.
There wasn’t a lot of appreciation for him. This post was halfway down the first page. That said, I couldn’t have put it better myself. Well said sir.
Spud MK2
Minimumweight
Posts: 433
Joined: 18 Oct 2025, 22:21

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Spud MK2 »

i am going to be honest

i like Adam he is a thoroughly decent bloke but he grovels after Eddie

who can remember eddie being given an exclusive contract … signing loads of fighters then dumping sky
Last edited by Spud MK2 on 22 Nov 2025, 13:38, edited 1 time in total.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5429
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Adam Smith

Post by forcefraser »

Hope he isnt on commentary tonight.

I need a growl free event
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100664
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

forcefraser wrote: 22 Nov 2025, 13:36 Hope he isnt on commentary tonight.

I need a growl free event
He isn’t.
It’s an American show in Saudi.
Spud MK2
Minimumweight
Posts: 433
Joined: 18 Oct 2025, 22:21

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Spud MK2 »

edit
Last edited by Spud MK2 on 22 Nov 2025, 14:57, edited 2 times in total.
Spud MK2
Minimumweight
Posts: 433
Joined: 18 Oct 2025, 22:21

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Spud MK2 »

i like john rawlng
Spud MK2
Minimumweight
Posts: 433
Joined: 18 Oct 2025, 22:21

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Spud MK2 »

im told ron mackintosh and george groves have
got the bbc gig
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100664
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Adam Smith

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Spud MK2 wrote: 22 Nov 2025, 13:59 i like john rawlng
There was a bried period where Rawling worked with Claude Abrams. Good duo.
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5135
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by TheLeprechaun »

When is this cockroach going to f*ck off indefinitely
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39200
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Adam Smith

Post by margaret thatcher »

big man gets his own poster, what a legend :lol:
Rezzer1967
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 186
Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 14:09

Re: Adam Smith

Post by Rezzer1967 »

I’ll be giving that a miss, whatever that is ( what is it ? ).
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16747
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by keithmoonhangover »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 17 Feb 2026, 09:52 When is this cockroach going to f*ck off indefinitely
I get that you don't like his commentary, but to call him cockroach... :shame:
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5135
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Adam Smith

Post by TheLeprechaun »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 19 Feb 2026, 11:00
TheLeprechaun wrote: 17 Feb 2026, 09:52 When is this cockroach going to f*ck off indefinitely
I get that you don't like his commentary, but to call him cockroach... :shame:
In hindsight you're right. I take it back.

It's an insult to cockroaches.
Post Reply