He just gonna post anniversaries now
Fury - Top 10 of all time
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 102878
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23057
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time
He posts training videos every day, often spars with active pros.
Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time
He’s way way above Bruno. Bruno was found wanting against any top heavy who came to fight. He managed to beat a messed up mcall, old bugner, that’s about it. Fury only ever lost to usyk and it wasn’t easy either. He’s a class above Bruno.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025, 18:45Im being charitable, but heavyweight division isnt that deep to be fair, not too many heavyweights who won a title who had logevity.
Outside top 10, gets hard to rate people.
Is he above or below Bruno? Hard to say.
For what its worth, i think Fury had a lot of talent, with more discipline he could have done more. Never elite level, but he was competitive with Usyk twice, tjough of course should have lost by KO in their first fight.
He’s not quite top ten for me tho mind. Fury prob 15-20 all time maybe for me.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45233
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time
I am inclined to agree. I'd say somewhere between 15-20 for me too, but it gets very difficult to rate people once you get beyond the established real top boys.cfang wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 13:18He’s way way above Bruno. Bruno was found wanting against any top heavy who came to fight. He managed to beat a messed up mcall, old bugner, that’s about it. Fury only ever lost to usyk and it wasn’t easy either. He’s a class above Bruno.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑26 Nov 2025, 18:45Im being charitable, but heavyweight division isnt that deep to be fair, not too many heavyweights who won a title who had logevity.
Outside top 10, gets hard to rate people.
Is he above or below Bruno? Hard to say.
For what its worth, i think Fury had a lot of talent, with more discipline he could have done more. Never elite level, but he was competitive with Usyk twice, tjough of course should have lost by KO in their first fight.
He’s not quite top ten for me tho mind. Fury prob 15-20 all time maybe for me.
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5349
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time
Fury is more like top 30 but with his size, awkwardness and bottle he'd be a difficult night for almost all of them.
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9181
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: Fury - Top 10 of all time
Zero clue where fury ranks as a pure boxer (as in if they all had a big tournement where would he come)... there is noone remotly like him to compare too. I think he would of beat everyone in the 60/70s... very unpopular but eh, thats just my thoughts.
But in terms of where he ranks as achivment... Very hard to say... Depends how much you rate old klit, and wilder...
But in terms of where he ranks as achivment... Very hard to say... Depends how much you rate old klit, and wilder...