pundit
Heavyweight
Post
by pundit » 12 Oct 2006, 19:55
You decide.
Cheers,
P
lvlarc
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871 Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24
Post
by lvlarc » 12 Oct 2006, 20:11
Is this yet another typical anti Calzaghe thread from Pundit?
You decide.
Cheers,
M
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084 Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Post
by Max Molyneux » 13 Oct 2006, 04:50
Is Pundit Kessler's best ball licker in years?
You decide.
Cheers
M
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093 Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01
Post
by Autobarn » 13 Oct 2006, 04:56
Imagine this:
Beyer beats Kessler.
Already Bika looks better, as he was going to beat Beyer last May.
Calzaghe beats a better than expected Bika, in a close, exciting fight.
Bika=better than Kessler
nickd
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071 Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45
Post
by nickd » 13 Oct 2006, 10:04
Pundit you are clearly a moron. I'm no Calzaghe fan but your witch hunt is pathetic.
pundit
Heavyweight
Post
by pundit » 13 Oct 2006, 13:45
nickd wrote: Pundit you are clearly a moron. I'm no Calzaghe fan but your witch hunt is pathetic.
Only radical truthtellling can help against the nuthugging-blindness epidemic, caused by the FWarrren virus, that holds this forum in its grip.
pundit
Heavyweight
Post
by pundit » 14 Oct 2006, 19:53
Thought this one should get a second hearing.
Cheers,
P
leforge
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790 Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44
Post
by leforge » 14 Oct 2006, 20:20
no but he was better than most expected. Joe won but did not look that good i favour kessler over the joe of tonight.
leforge
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790 Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44
Post
by leforge » 14 Oct 2006, 20:21
0ttke was poor imo joe would have stopped him easily imo.
salaco
Heavyweight
Posts: 143 Joined: 11 Feb 2004, 07:43
Post
by salaco » 14 Oct 2006, 22:18
He's certainly up there among his best victories IMO, anyone who had seen him before would have agreed he was no jimenez or salem. Its too bad for calzaghe that smw is a lot stronger division now than when he was in his physical prime...
Deram
Heavyweight
Posts: 168 Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 22:55
Post
by Deram » 16 Oct 2006, 00:34
No, he was just not a slow, hook-based fighter.
If Calzaghe wants to look good, he should take on Markussen, Briggs or Dave Green.
Of course if he thinks he can beat a great for real fighter, then he should take on Kessler.
salaco
Heavyweight
Posts: 143 Joined: 11 Feb 2004, 07:43
Post
by salaco » 16 Oct 2006, 00:42
Deram wrote: No, he was just not a slow, hook-based fighter.
If Calzaghe wants to look good, he should take on Markussen, Briggs or Dave Green.
Of course if he thinks he can beat a great for real fighter, then he should take on Kessler.
Makussen?! current affairs would suggest otherwise....Actually it was bikas straight right which was most damaging...he needs to fight kessler but andrade might be a better match...