Is Bika Calzaghe's best opponent in years?

Post Reply

Is Bika Calzaghe's best opponent in years?

Yes
13
59%
No, Mario Veit was even better
9
41%
 
Total votes: 22

pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Is Bika Calzaghe's best opponent in years?

Post by pundit »

You decide. :TU: :box:

Cheers,
P
lvlarc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871
Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24

Post by lvlarc »

Is this yet another typical anti Calzaghe thread from Pundit?

You decide. :TU: :box:

Cheers,
M
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Is Pundit Kessler's best ball licker in years?

You decide. :TU: :box:

Cheers
M
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Imagine this:

Beyer beats Kessler.

Already Bika looks better, as he was going to beat Beyer last May.

Calzaghe beats a better than expected Bika, in a close, exciting fight.

Bika=better than Kessler
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

Pundit you are clearly a moron. I'm no Calzaghe fan but your witch hunt is pathetic.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

nickd wrote:Pundit you are clearly a moron. I'm no Calzaghe fan but your witch hunt is pathetic.
Only radical truthtellling can help against the nuthugging-blindness epidemic, caused by the FWarrren virus, that holds this forum in its grip. :TU:
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Is Bika Calzaghe's best opponent in years?

Post by pundit »

Thought this one should get a second hearing.

Cheers,
P :TU:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Post by leforge »

no but he was better than most expected. Joe won but did not look that good i favour kessler over the joe of tonight.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Post by leforge »

0ttke was poor imo joe would have stopped him easily imo.
salaco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 143
Joined: 11 Feb 2004, 07:43

Post by salaco »

He's certainly up there among his best victories IMO, anyone who had seen him before would have agreed he was no jimenez or salem. Its too bad for calzaghe that smw is a lot stronger division now than when he was in his physical prime...
Deram
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 168
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 22:55

Post by Deram »

No, he was just not a slow, hook-based fighter.

If Calzaghe wants to look good, he should take on Markussen, Briggs or Dave Green.

Of course if he thinks he can beat a great for real fighter, then he should take on Kessler. :TU:
salaco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 143
Joined: 11 Feb 2004, 07:43

Post by salaco »

Deram wrote:No, he was just not a slow, hook-based fighter.

If Calzaghe wants to look good, he should take on Markussen, Briggs or Dave Green.

Of course if he thinks he can beat a great for real fighter, then he should take on Kessler. :TU:
Makussen?! current affairs would suggest otherwise....Actually it was bikas straight right which was most damaging...he needs to fight kessler but andrade might be a better match...
Post Reply