On this day, 27 years ago...
silkov wrote:Who cares about what?.... that its 27 years or that it was for the vacant title and not Coetzees title???...
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not???8)
portrayed mistakenly as well
<<<<Who cares about what?.... that its 27 years or that it was for the vacant title and not Coetzees title???...
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not??? >>>>>
Boy do you have a LOT of work to do !!!
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not??? >>>>>
Boy do you have a LOT of work to do !!!
Co-incidently I just watched this fight,not much finesse but an exciting brawl. I could never figure how in some fights Weaver could take such a good shot, then in others he'd fall over as soon as he got clocked.silkov wrote:Yeh, thats right, Coetzee fought Weaver for the title as well... but his fight with Tate was for the vacant title...expug wrote:Tate won the vacant version I thought from Coetzee.
A few years later Coetzee beat Dokes for one of the alphabet titles no?
He was certainly an interesting fighter though, one of my favourite Heavyweights of the late 70's/80's
Not as much as you dimbo!...cosand wrote:<<<<Who cares about what?.... that its 27 years or that it was for the vacant title and not Coetzees title???...
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not??? >>>>>
Boy do you have a LOT of work to do !!!
-
torodecayey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 44
- Joined: 13 May 2005, 18:05
i think he means youre undertaking one heck of a task...silkov wrote:Not as much as you dimbo!...cosand wrote:<<<<Who cares about what?.... that its 27 years or that it was for the vacant title and not Coetzees title???...
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not??? >>>>>
Boy do you have a LOT of work to do !!!![]()
![]()