WTF? Earl vs M'baye for WBA lightwelter title?
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4097
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
WTF? Earl vs M'baye for WBA lightwelter title?
Was juSt checking the schedule for the UK and it says m'baye is scheduled to defend his title against earl with audley and khan supporting. I think this is a tough ask for earl who should stay at lightweight. If he reproduces the form that he did against romanov he could defo win the european lightweight crown and maybe WBO.
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
I quite like this fight - at least with with the British angle its bound to get good treatment with ITV - Luckily the chief support fight (Amir Khan was on it?) on the Woods vs Johnson bill finished early - otherwise we wouldn't have got Balbi vs Mbaye.
So I hope this leads to big things for Mbaye on the TV front - plus it could work for a possible Earl vs Khan match maybe towards the end of the year.
Maybe FW has seen that, following his very very close bruising win over Ramirez, that Earl not going to go futher and is going to gear him to the "credible opponent" mode.
So I hope this leads to big things for Mbaye on the TV front - plus it could work for a possible Earl vs Khan match maybe towards the end of the year.
Maybe FW has seen that, following his very very close bruising win over Ramirez, that Earl not going to go futher and is going to gear him to the "credible opponent" mode.
-
glittermonkey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2658
- Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03
Earl's between a rock and a hard place with this fight. He really has no chance at all, but he is getting a shot at a bona fide world title (he could still be waiting this time next year for his WBO LW title shot) and it will almost certainly be his biggest ever payday. I just can't see how he can say no.Kilburn wrote:I'd be disappointed for Earl if this went ahead. He put in the performance of his career to see off Romanov, thoroughly professional from start to finish. He should be building on that.
At least Frank has moved up in the world. Now he's getting guys shots at the 'reputable' WBA title as opposed to the WBU.silkov wrote:This fight stinks really, what has Earl done do deserve a shot even at 135??.... let alone at a higher weight which he has never fought at before!!.... absolutely laughable!... thanks Fwank for turning British boxing into the shit it now is!...
What a load of bollocks. Earl would get beaten at championship level against the top 135lb'ers, now he's getting a shot at 140, without even fighting there? Why do we bother? I don't blame Earl for taking this, if it's offered. But I really don't see him winning. Or even being that competitive, which is the real downer on the WBA. Still, what do you expect from people who currently have 3 champions at Cruiserweight?
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
-
jomothepure
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2660
- Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 08:43
Sorry if this is old news on another thread, but according to the schedule at any rate, it appears M'Baye-Earl is off. Earl will instead make a WBU lightweight defense on the same card (against http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=078853 ) and M'Baye is back to facing TBA.
You know what, maybe those spoil sports at the WBA didn't want to sanction this?
You know what, maybe those spoil sports at the WBA didn't want to sanction this?
-
kevin
- Heavyweight

This is a piece by Ian on BBN.
http://www.britishboxing.net/news_1997- ... y-man.html
I'm now hearing that Earl could possible face Gavin Rees instead though.
http://www.britishboxing.net/news_1997- ... y-man.html
I'm now hearing that Earl could possible face Gavin Rees instead though.