larry holmes vs lennox lewis
exactly...think about it, for all the stellar performances he turned in the media gave more attention to his fall at the hands of Snipes than just about any other event. The big story on that one is not that he fell but how he recovered after a fluke flush shot that just might have done in a number of other greats.
Great performances were greeted with a ho hum attitude quite often. If only he would have been more flamboyant his legacy would be far enhanced. But to the serious observer he really is in the top five without much quarrel.
Great performances were greeted with a ho hum attitude quite often. If only he would have been more flamboyant his legacy would be far enhanced. But to the serious observer he really is in the top five without much quarrel.
Although I don't think Lewis is as great as Larry I think he also a victim of this... He was often cautious and underwhelming in his wins. Many hold this against him whilst drooling over the more action-packed and entertaining Tyson.BoxBuzz wrote:exactly...think about it, for all the stellar performances he turned in the media gave more attention to his fall at the hands of Snipes than just about any other event. The big story on that one is not that he fell but how he recovered after a fluke flush shot that just might have done in a number of other greats.
Great performances were greeted with a ho hum attitude quite often. If only he would have been more flamboyant his legacy would be far enhanced. But to the serious observer he really is in the top five without much quarrel.
like he almost lost to Ken Norton? Lewis power would beat Holmes cards atleast 5 times out of 10. Lewis is too big and strong for Larry to play his game. And the variety of punches lewis had was far more greater than Larry had. The jab and stamina would get him the SD probably but Lewis could take this by KO.BoxBuzz wrote:Holmes beats this guy first time every time.
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
cultus wrote:like he almost lost to Ken Norton? Lewis power would beat Holmes cards atleast 5 times out of 10. Lewis is too big and strong for Larry to play his game. And the variety of punches lewis had was far more greater than Larry had. The jab and stamina would get him the SD probably but Lewis could take this by KO.BoxBuzz wrote:Holmes beats this guy first time every time.
hmmmmm, Norton was far better than those two stiffs who managed to pole-axe Lewis. Anyway, Holmes beat him in a great fight. Did Lewis have many great fights? That one against Mercer wasn't bad. Nice and close - could have gone either way. But wasn't Mercer the bloke who had his ears boxed off by an ancient Holmes though?
that's true.. I havent really seen that fight but it was in the beginning of Mercers career wasnt it? Id say Mercer was a differente fighter when he and Lewis met. And styles does make a difference. I just see Larrys style very suitable for Lewis. Mercer was right in Lewises face as Larry would be backing up giving Lewis more space to reach with that right hand.Collins2000 wrote:cultus wrote:like he almost lost to Ken Norton? Lewis power would beat Holmes cards atleast 5 times out of 10. Lewis is too big and strong for Larry to play his game. And the variety of punches lewis had was far more greater than Larry had. The jab and stamina would get him the SD probably but Lewis could take this by KO.BoxBuzz wrote:Holmes beats this guy first time every time.
hmmmmm, Norton was far better than those two stiffs who managed to pole-axe Lewis. Anyway, Holmes beat him in a great fight. Did Lewis have many great fights? That one against Mercer wasn't bad. Nice and close - could have gone either way. But wasn't Mercer the bloke who had his ears boxed off by an ancient Holmes though?
I doubt Larry could take the right hands that Mercer did.
Lennox wins doing handstands. Holmes had a fast accurate jab. Lewis' is twice as powerful. Holmes moves like the Queen Mary. Lewis can move if it suits him a lot better. Holmes cant punch with anything like the power Lennox has. Lewis probably thinks Holmes is too small, and not dangerous enough to trouble him, and steamrollers him a la Ruddock, Galota and Grant.
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
cultus wrote:that's true.. I havent really seen that fight but it was in the beginning of Mercers career wasnt it? Id say Mercer was a differente fighter when he and Lewis met. And styles does make a difference. I just see Larrys style very suitable for Lewis. Mercer was right in Lewises face as Larry would be backing up giving Lewis more space to reach with that right hand.Collins2000 wrote:cultus wrote: like he almost lost to Ken Norton? Lewis power would beat Holmes cards atleast 5 times out of 10. Lewis is too big and strong for Larry to play his game. And the variety of punches lewis had was far more greater than Larry had. The jab and stamina would get him the SD probably but Lewis could take this by KO.
hmmmmm, Norton was far better than those two stiffs who managed to pole-axe Lewis. Anyway, Holmes beat him in a great fight. Did Lewis have many great fights? That one against Mercer wasn't bad. Nice and close - could have gone either way. But wasn't Mercer the bloke who had his ears boxed off by an ancient Holmes though?
I doubt Larry could take the right hands that Mercer did.
Hardly, but why let facts get in the way of a good excuse.
-
thunderfromdownunder
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55
-
wolverine1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 102
- Joined: 11 Nov 2005, 05:30
holmes vs lewis
I'd go with Lewis in this one. Sure Larry had a great jab, but that was pretty much it.
Lewis could connect with one of his outside uppercuts and get Holmes in trouble. Also, Lewis' jab isn't that bad either, he could time Holmes, and get his own jabs in.
Lewis could also unload that awesome overhand right that he delivers like a sledgehammer behind on of his own jabs.
Lewis, with his reach, strength, & movement would give Holmes a tough fight, and win by a decision.
Lewis could connect with one of his outside uppercuts and get Holmes in trouble. Also, Lewis' jab isn't that bad either, he could time Holmes, and get his own jabs in.
Lewis could also unload that awesome overhand right that he delivers like a sledgehammer behind on of his own jabs.
Lewis, with his reach, strength, & movement would give Holmes a tough fight, and win by a decision.
-
bill.lockhart
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 249
- Joined: 01 Nov 2005, 11:40
Holmes- Lewis
... Holmes...
Great fighters are never beaten by inferior opposition. Lewis was & Holmes wasn't ... in their prime years. Larry had the whiskers to withstand anything Lewis could dish out. Holmes would win by a mid to late ko or at worst, unanimous decision. This is an easy choice.
Great fighters are never beaten by inferior opposition. Lewis was & Holmes wasn't ... in their prime years. Larry had the whiskers to withstand anything Lewis could dish out. Holmes would win by a mid to late ko or at worst, unanimous decision. This is an easy choice.
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
I agree with Bill. This isn't that hard of choice. Holmes wins this. Holmes had much better skills than Lewis. He beat him with his jab and combinations. Lewis jab isn't in Holmes league. Often he would just paw with it. Holmes' jab was fast and had enough on it to keep Lewis away. Lewis was a hard puncher and he would have a remote puncher's chance.
However, the most likely result is Holmes winning a fairly comfortable decison.
However, the most likely result is Holmes winning a fairly comfortable decison.