Yes that video does make an excellent point pundit. I truly believe that boxing talent is on the decline, and love the history of the sport, but size does matter. However, in most cases there has to be at least a remote similarity in talent for the size difference to have a great influence in the outcome. For example, while it’s very easy for me to envision Marciano beating Valuev, it’s much harder to envision the Rock beating Lewis.pundit wrote:Well look at this clipBoxBuzz wrote:Could Jack Dempsey do the same thing to the 300+ Valuev? I want to think so....but I'm struggling these days with finding what I believe to be true on this subject.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaigdKiO8Xc
and imagine Marciano or Dempsey there instead of Bidenko.
185 lb. champ
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
I'd agree with that.The Great John L wrote:Yes that video does make an excellent point pundit. I truly believe that boxing talent is on the decline, and love the history of the sport, but size does matter. However, in most cases there has to be at least a remote similarity in talent for the size difference to have a great influence in the outcome. For example, while it’s very easy for me to envision Marciano beating Valuev, it’s much harder to envision the Rock beating Lewis.pundit wrote:Well look at this clipBoxBuzz wrote:Could Jack Dempsey do the same thing to the 300+ Valuev? I want to think so....but I'm struggling these days with finding what I believe to be true on this subject.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaigdKiO8Xc
and imagine Marciano or Dempsey there instead of Bidenko.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Williard worked on ranches pre-boxing . . he was not in a circus.theone wrote:Willard was a circus strong man who entered boxing at a late age. He was succesful because he was so much bigger than everyone else. Thats it.Jess Willard was better than Valuev, and Dempsey demolished him; as giants, I remember Ewart Potgieter (near of 330 lbs) or Ray Impellitière (270), and they could very easy defeated by strong boys as Dempsey or Rock
Ewart Portgieter? Ray Impellitiere? Gimme a break.
Please inform me of Valuev's extensive amateur background and early entry into boxing that would make his experience very different from Williards . . . .
.Williard worked on ranches pre-boxing . . he was not in a circus.
Please inform me of Valuev's extensive amateur background and early entry into boxing that would make his experience very different from Williards . . .
Right you are. Forgive my brain fart, it was Primo that worked in a circus not Willard.
The rest of my point still stands. I was responding to a quote that Willard was better than Valuev. Willard was good because of his size, period. He toward over Johnson and Johnson was himself considered a giant in those days.
Today Johnson would be a small heavyweight.
Valuev is much bigger than Willard, so there goes Willards greatest asset. Valuev is also a considerible better boxer. Willards stance and the way he held his arms would get him laughed out the ring today.