Matthew Saad Muhammed vs Evander Holyfield @ Cruiser 195

Post Reply
zuru
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 775
Joined: 10 Mar 2005, 17:48

Matthew Saad Muhammed vs Evander Holyfield @ Cruiser 195

Post by zuru »

This would be the younger,fresher Saad,not the tired,past his prime shell.Saad was an underrated boxer,but he could box.His wars are what he was known for.You know this would be a "fight of the year" fight.Again,I think Holyfield "may" have an edge in speed,a little in size,but everything else equal.Saad would come out using that very good jab that he had when he did use it,with Holyfield applying pressure.After a couple of rounds like this,Saad HAS to take the invitation to brawl,and things get atomic.They go back and forth,slugging it out,in a fast paced war.I like Holyfield,but my heart likes Saad(maybe on account of having seen him do the things that earned him the name "Miracle Matthew).Saad takes a close decision,and before they leave the ring,a rematch is already being talked about,
zuru
barry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3797
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

re

Post by barry »

Muhammad was one of my favorites of the 70s and 80s, and one of the most exciting fighters one could ever hope to watch at 175, but I think Holyfield would be a bit too strong for Muhammad.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

Holyfield outstrengths him then outworks him and takes a blood and guts points victory.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17026
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Post by Seamus »

Don't know how MSM would handle a move up to Cruiserweight, but either way, I see Holyfield destroying him inside of 4 rounds. MSM wouldn't survive Evander's headshots the way he did Yaqui Lopez's.
meade95
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 439
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 22:30

Post by meade95 »

At 195.....Holyfield simply much to strong....plus had incredibly fast hands in his prime.....Holyfield by TKO inside of 10...
Expug
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4457
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 18:40

Post by Expug »

Yeah , like Barry , Saad was a fav. of mine back in the 70s and 80s.
I just dont see him beating Evander.
His stand in there and bang , blood and guts warrior style would play right into the stronger Holyfields hands.
I think Evander would stop him.
zuru
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 775
Joined: 10 Mar 2005, 17:48

Re: Matthew Saad Muhammed vs Evander Holyfield @ Cruiser 195

Post by zuru »

zuru wrote:This would be the younger,fresher Saad,not the tired,past his prime shell.Saad was an underrated boxer,but he could box.His wars are what he was known for.You know this would be a "fight of the year" fight.Again,I think Holyfield "may" have an edge in speed,a little in size,but everything else equal.Saad would come out using that very good jab that he had when he did use it,with Holyfield applying pressure.After a couple of rounds like this,Saad HAS to take the invitation to brawl,and things get atomic.They go back and forth,slugging it out,in a fast paced war.I like Holyfield,but my heart likes Saad(maybe on account of having seen him do the things that earned him the name "Miracle Matthew).Saad takes a close decision,and before they leave the ring,a rematch is already being talked about,
zuru
Like I said,I like Holyfield,but my heart goes w/Saad.I know more than likely Holyfield would take this,but a Saad fan can dream can't he.What i liked about Holyfield,was his combinations,which he threw like he was a middleweight.Sure his heart,and slugfests were impressive,but it was his skills that made a fan out of me.He had good speed,excellent coordination/combinations,a good chin,and stamina.He could get down,when he had to.I liked him skillwise better at Cruiser,when he could use those advantages that were somewhat negated at heavy.So like many of you,I put up fights that I would like to see,but give an admittedly(sometimes stupid)biased account as to what I think would happen.So realistically,I think he'd take Saad,maybe Spinks(you have to keep in mind Spinks awkwardness,as well as his skills),but Marciano takes him,no clowning,
zuru
dr_devious
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5348
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19

Post by dr_devious »

Holyfield, by stoppage after 8 rounds
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Post by The Great John L »

Saad wasn't just a favorite of mine, but was my favorite fighter for a number of years. Holyfield by mid rounds stoppage.
Eric the Viking
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1354
Joined: 03 Apr 2003, 21:40

Post by Eric the Viking »

Not close - in this case "A beat B and B beat C so A beats C" really does apply, with A = Holyfield, B = Qawi, C = Saad.
zuru
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 775
Joined: 10 Mar 2005, 17:48

Post by zuru »

Eric the Viking wrote:Not close - in this case "A beat B and B beat C so A beats C" really does apply, with A = Holyfield, B = Qawi, C = Saad.
It's funny,I was just thinking of that,A beats B,who beat C,so naturally A should beat C,right?But usually C proceeds to whale the tar out of A,in these scenarios.
Post Reply