The grim reality of the April 7th betting odds
The grim reality of the April 7th betting odds
http://www.oddschecker.com/other-sports/boxing
Have a gander at the odds for the Calzaghe bill.
They've got 'pick em' going through them like a stick of Sports Network rock.
Have a gander at the odds for the Calzaghe bill.
They've got 'pick em' going through them like a stick of Sports Network rock.
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3336
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5348
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Well my money is going on Calzaghe by points @ 7/2.....I don't know why there is all this shit surrounding the fight that Joe is going to batter Manfredo and stop him.
1. Manfredo has never been stopped
2. Calzaghe has stopped one opponent in 3 yrs
3. Salem, Ashira & Bika all went the distance so why can't Manfredo?
1. Manfredo has never been stopped
2. Calzaghe has stopped one opponent in 3 yrs
3. Salem, Ashira & Bika all went the distance so why can't Manfredo?
7/2 is pretty tempting. I would urge a bit of caution on the comparason to past opponents though. Salem and Bika are both tough bastards and Salem in particular had gone the distance with some decent SMW fighters before fighting Calzaghe, I still consdier Manfredo's chin to be pretty untested at 168. As for Ashira it's another fight were Joe claims he broke his hand half way through and boxed for a points win. Whether he did or not I don't know but he did seem to be in some discomfort.Hagler2k7 wrote:Well my money is going on Calzaghe by points @ 7/2.....I don't know why there is all this shit surrounding the fight that Joe is going to batter Manfredo and stop him.
1. Manfredo has never been stopped
2. Calzaghe has stopped one opponent in 3 yrs
3. Salem, Ashira & Bika all went the distance so why can't Manfredo?
I do agree that 7/2 is decent odds though.
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3336
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
BTW, some interesting odds there.
I did expect to see Corrales open as a slight favourite vs Clottey - he's not, I think thats a little tempting.
Jermain Taylor hasn't really been an impressive champion thus far, I think I give Spinks a better chance than Ouma - so the 11/2 odds isn't bad.
I think Branco should be the favourite over Drews - so good odds here for Silivno 58/19. Decent odds for Castillejo to repeat his quite brutal success over Sturm. I do think Sturm will get revenge, but wouldn't lay any money on it.
Frietais at 11/4 vs the Baby Bull is a bit tempting, although I do favour Diaz.
Who knows how much Vitali has left at his age and with his injury problems. I think the odds for Maskaev are a little tempting.
I'd make Hopkins the favourite vs Wright so even odds are tempting for the Executioner.
I would say that even at 3/10 on, that is tempting to put your money on Hill. He beat Maske at a canter last time and with 10 years of inactivity I cannot see how Hill will do any different. Although, he might need a KO.
I did expect to see Corrales open as a slight favourite vs Clottey - he's not, I think thats a little tempting.
Jermain Taylor hasn't really been an impressive champion thus far, I think I give Spinks a better chance than Ouma - so the 11/2 odds isn't bad.
I think Branco should be the favourite over Drews - so good odds here for Silivno 58/19. Decent odds for Castillejo to repeat his quite brutal success over Sturm. I do think Sturm will get revenge, but wouldn't lay any money on it.
Frietais at 11/4 vs the Baby Bull is a bit tempting, although I do favour Diaz.
Who knows how much Vitali has left at his age and with his injury problems. I think the odds for Maskaev are a little tempting.
I'd make Hopkins the favourite vs Wright so even odds are tempting for the Executioner.
I would say that even at 3/10 on, that is tempting to put your money on Hill. He beat Maske at a canter last time and with 10 years of inactivity I cannot see how Hill will do any different. Although, he might need a KO.
-
E
- Heavyweight

It was 8/1 for a couple of days (laid only a tenner stupidly!) but after a post here and assuumingly loads of bets of round 1 and 2, the odds halved...jamesmcdonnell wrote:That just shows what a mistmatch this is that the odds are so low.Hagler2k7 wrote:Macca is 4/1 for the 1st and the same for the 2nd
I can't wait to see how ITV are going to try and sell this bloke as a worthy challenger
-
Chesney_Chambers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 332
- Joined: 08 May 2005, 12:42
The Calzaghe-Manfredo and Enzo-Gunn fights annoy the shit out of me, April 7th has to be the most one-sided World championship bill in the history of boxing
Enzo-Haye almost gets made (until Warren insists on options and the right to bone Hayes immediate family), but what replacement do we get to replace this British superfight.....Bobby Gunn whos biggest win was against Shannon Landberg, who got sparked by a 49 year old in his previous fight (admittedly it was Thomas Hitman Hearns).
Kessler and Froch especially have been calling out Calzaghe, either fight would be awesome, but Calzaghes fighting Manfredo instead.
These 2 fights symbolise everything that is wrong with the sport, any non-casual fan who is going to this bill needs to take a long hard look at themselves
Enzo-Haye almost gets made (until Warren insists on options and the right to bone Hayes immediate family), but what replacement do we get to replace this British superfight.....Bobby Gunn whos biggest win was against Shannon Landberg, who got sparked by a 49 year old in his previous fight (admittedly it was Thomas Hitman Hearns).
Kessler and Froch especially have been calling out Calzaghe, either fight would be awesome, but Calzaghes fighting Manfredo instead.
These 2 fights symbolise everything that is wrong with the sport, any non-casual fan who is going to this bill needs to take a long hard look at themselves
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
I can see the climb down now...Hagler2k7 wrote:You have done it now, expect a letter and a pending lawsuit, you will be homeless and skint within a monthChesney_Chambers wrote:Enzo-Haye almost gets made (until Warren insists on options and the right to bone Hayes immediate family)
"Boxrec wishes to point out, that clearly the comments made painted Mr Warren to be expecting to acquire the rights to sleep with members of Mr Haye's direct family, on signing of a contract to fight Mr Enzo Macaranelli, were quite baseless, and the furthermore, This would insinutate, quite wrongly, that Mr Warren wished to sleep with the said sister and mother of Mr Haye, or that indeed, Mr Warren wished to contract their the rights to their services for sexual liaison with himself or other members of his organisation, or other individuals which is quite untrue."
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13250
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01