Rumour has it...

STP · Post by **STP** » 27 Jun 2007, 22:32

Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP

The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable

STP · Post by **STP** » 27 Jun 2007, 23:34

Baffling because here Ray Hatton says they'll sign the Mayweather fight contract this week: http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/sport/ ... _au_bb.asx

Autobarn · Post by **Autobarn** » 28 Jun 2007, 03:26

M'Baye - a one off with Warren? Was convinced thought that Frank was keeping that title warm for Khan.

Then Mosley? Interesting, I'll give it that.

Well structured move, because i.e. take on 2ndary league title holder and then an A-lister.

Mosley could be tough for Hatton. Shane has class and power. But he lacks speed and zest now and IS an old guy...

Shirow · Post by **Shirow** » 28 Jun 2007, 04:28

Autobarn wrote:Shane has class and power. But he lacks speed and zest now and IS an old guy...

Did you see Mosley's fight with Collazo? He looked rejuvenated

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 28 Jun 2007, 04:40

I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO

boxingchat · Post by **boxingchat** » 28 Jun 2007, 04:43

STP wrote:Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP

The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable

Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember, Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.

You original source is wrong and therefore not reliable.

boxingchat · Post by **boxingchat** » 28 Jun 2007, 04:46

Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO

Don't worry your ass is safe!

Phenomenal-Nutrition · Post by **Phenomenal-Nutrition** » 28 Jun 2007, 04:55

STP wrote:Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP

The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable

Whats the source? Our resident SN insider has called it BS and these fights make little sense financially

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 28 Jun 2007, 04:56

boxingchat wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO
Don't worry your ass is safe!

Damn!!!

Autobarn · Post by **Autobarn** » 28 Jun 2007, 04:58

Shirow wrote:
Autobarn wrote:Shane has class and power. But he lacks speed and zest now and IS an old guy...
Did you see Mosley's fight with Collazo? He looked rejuvenated

I don't think he was rejuvenated. Just a good ring general. He used movement against a man with no movement.

Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember, Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.

If Hatton's not a world champion then no SN fighters are world champions. Because it's habitual to pick up a belt without even beating a world class opponent. Macca isn't a world champion. Arthur definitely won't be - whether he gets half of a WBO or full - because is he even going to go near Pac, Soto or Marquez? Hatton beat Tszyu, and so it doesn't matter which title he holds - he's still the champion.

fried bread · Post by **fried bread** » 28 Jun 2007, 05:33

Why not a non-title affair? Ricky would beat MBaye, vacate the belt anyway. Champion vs title holder, it could still easily be marketed.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 28 Jun 2007, 05:48

Am I missing something, why would Ricky even entertain the idea of giving a allegedly fighter a shot at the BIG time????

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 28 Jun 2007, 06:27

MEN? And a nice big wedge of cash. There is obviously a lot of promotion behnd a huge super event, perhaps they dont feel any other promoter in the UK can pull off a millenium stadium sized show?

Who knows. Boxings a funny business.

Greg Nicholas · Post by **Greg Nicholas** » 28 Jun 2007, 06:32

He surely wont fight M'Baye (Warren would want to stage a Hatton-PBF or Hatton-DLH at Wembley or some shit out of spite for Benn and Eubank), but i do know for a fact that Hatton wants to fight in Oct because they feel the long layoffs before the Collazo and Urango debacles did him no favours..

Roars Like Me · Post by **Roars Like Me** » 28 Jun 2007, 06:35

Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO

I'm scared for you

It sounds likely as Warren dropped his libel in a heartbeat as long as Ray links up with him for a fight or two.

Wales · Post by **Wales** » 28 Jun 2007, 06:54

Greg Nicholas wrote:He surely wont fight M'Baye (Warren would want to stage a Hatton-PBF or Hatton-DLH at Wembley or some shit out of spite for Benn and Eubank), but i do know for a fact that Hatton wants to fight in Oct because they feel the long layoffs before the Collazo and Urango debacles did him no favours..

Warren has always said keeping Hatton busy was a huge priority due to the weight issues etc... Im sure the NOTW column will be full of praise on Sunday.

Autobarn · Post by **Autobarn** » 28 Jun 2007, 07:10

The thing is, is M'Baye any lesser than Malignaggi? I'd say they're about equal. Paulie brings trash talking and a New York following. M'Baye can be done at the MEN. Two big stages there.

As B/C says, Kotelnik is the obstacle. M'Baye never has it easy with this guy who won't go away. I won't moan about the decisions, but you can make a case for Kotelnik winning one of those fights, at least.

twenty six · Post by **twenty six** » 28 Jun 2007, 07:38

.................... STP talks bollocks.

Flump · Post by **Flump** » 28 Jun 2007, 17:30

boxingchat wrote:
STP wrote:Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP

The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable

Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember, Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.

You original source is wrong and therefore not reliable.

Hatton is the real champ at Light Welter, I don't think many people would argue with that, unless they had an agenda.

rhino222 · Post by **rhino222** » 28 Jun 2007, 17:41

Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO

what...again?

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 28 Jun 2007, 21:06

Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO

It wouldn't make any sense to me either, but then again neither did the Urango fight.

boxingchat · Post by **boxingchat** » 29 Jun 2007, 12:27

Flump wrote:
boxingchat wrote:
STP wrote:Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP

The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable

Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember, Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.

You original source is wrong and therefore not reliable.
Hatton is the real champ at Light Welter, I don't think many people would argue with that, unless they had an agenda.

I'm not arguing with you but the WBC, IBF, WBA and IBF only recognise each other and not the others. If this were not the case why did the WBC
allow their International belt last Saturday. Fact is, Hatton MAY be the best 10 stoner in the world (Not even in the north of England in my eyes) but the facts are the facts, he is not a World Champion, belt wise at least.

Maccarinelli is the WBO Champion so is a World Champion "Recognised"

WBU and IBO are not in the same league and that tihnk is universally accepted. In fact, the IBO splinter from the WBU so why Hatton even has it, wants it or needs it is beyond me.

boxingchat · Post by **boxingchat** » 29 Jun 2007, 12:28

rhino222 wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO
what...again?

You get the impression he wants his arse filled!

jomothepure · Post by **jomothepure** » 29 Jun 2007, 12:44

boxingchat wrote:
Flump wrote:
boxingchat wrote:
Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember, Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.

You original source is wrong and therefore not reliable.
Hatton is the real champ at Light Welter, I don't think many people would argue with that, unless they had an agenda.
I'm not arguing with you but the WBC, IBF, WBA and IBF only recognise each other and not the others. If this were not the case why did the WBC
allow their International belt last Saturday. Fact is, Hatton MAY be the best 10 stoner in the world (Not even in the north of England in my eyes) but the facts are the facts, he is not a World Champion, belt wise at least.

Maccarinelli is the WBO Champion so is a World Champion "Recognised"

WBU and IBO are not in the same league and that tihnk is universally accepted. In fact, the IBO splinter from the WBU so why Hatton even has it, wants it or needs it is beyond me.

Do you know how and why? I thought the IBO were formed first, or at any rate were sanctioning fights before the WBU, although admittedly that's different from which was formed first.

hitman_hatton1 · Post by **hitman_hatton1** » 29 Jun 2007, 13:48

the only reason hatton never had one of the major belts is cos they went and stripped him.

the belts cheapen thereselves when they do that.

and look how awful n'dou looked last week.

Rumour has it...

Rumour has it...

Re: Rumour has it...

Re: Rumour has it...

Re: Rumour has it...

Re: Rumour has it...

Re: Rumour has it...