John Murray tells Jon Thaxton "I'll fight you in Octobe
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Earl? I wouldn't rank him as the #1 Brit. His best domestic wins are a bit lucky.
I like Thaxton as the #1. Isn't Murray trying to step up too soon? Looks like Murray is suited to lightweight, and I think he's the best British prospect of the lot. Well schooled, improving, tidy and good with the presure (incl wicked body shots).
Then again, he's 21-0 and it's probably time to move up. I don't think he'd do a Meager, i.e. get walloped.
Still, it would have been good to see him in that Canadian fight on ShoBox.
I like Murray's style and his attitude a lot. Maybe a tune up or two would be in order, before Thaxton?
I like Thaxton as the #1. Isn't Murray trying to step up too soon? Looks like Murray is suited to lightweight, and I think he's the best British prospect of the lot. Well schooled, improving, tidy and good with the presure (incl wicked body shots).
Then again, he's 21-0 and it's probably time to move up. I don't think he'd do a Meager, i.e. get walloped.
Still, it would have been good to see him in that Canadian fight on ShoBox.
I like Murray's style and his attitude a lot. Maybe a tune up or two would be in order, before Thaxton?
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Can Murray do better than Meager?
Technically, John's better than Meager. But shouldn't he maybe fight a Meager or a Danny Hunt next? Before going in deep?
If he times it well, he could do Thaxton like Hatton did. Thaxton's difficult, fit & a good fighter, but he has had bad injuries and can lose composure under fire.
Often, Murray boxed very much within himself. I belive he is trying out different moves. Sky seem to think he's not doing anything.
Technically, John's better than Meager. But shouldn't he maybe fight a Meager or a Danny Hunt next? Before going in deep?
If he times it well, he could do Thaxton like Hatton did. Thaxton's difficult, fit & a good fighter, but he has had bad injuries and can lose composure under fire.
Often, Murray boxed very much within himself. I belive he is trying out different moves. Sky seem to think he's not doing anything.
I don't see Earl as Britain's number one whoever said that. His British title wins are long gone and he doesnt appear to be in the picture anymore as a genuine threat. Thaxton i think is the best at the weight and a fight with Murray would be terrific, Khan i imagine will pick off the shopworn Earl next.
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Earls win over Romanov is better than anyone Thaxtons beat BUT Thaxton maybe the better and may beat Earl. Would we expect Thaxton to beat Katsidis? Probably not.
Last edited by Phenomenal-Nutrition on 01 Aug 2007, 08:29, edited 1 time in total.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Because he got 2 HUGE gifts against Vanzie to win/defend the title or because he lost to Burns or because he chose to vacate the British title or because he just got destroyed against Katsidis?Twisted Transistor wrote:Thaxton may beat Earl I agree but he won't be No 1 unless he beats Earl or Ealr retires.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Earls win over Romanov is better than anyone Thaxtons beat BUT Thaxton maybe the better and may beat Earl. Would we expect Thaxton to beat Katsidis? Probably not.
Do you reckon Earl could ever repeat that win over Romanov? ie with Romanov keeping active, winning 2x EBU fights via KO, etcPhenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Earls win over Romanov is better than anyone Thaxtons beat BUT Thaxton maybe the better and may beat Earl. Would we expect Thaxton to beat Katsidis? Probably not.
OOPS, replied to the wrong post...
Last edited by Autobarn on 01 Aug 2007, 08:59, edited 2 times in total.
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Even though you weren't replying to me NO. Romanov is better now and he was rusty against Earl, Earl is probably past his best and probably couldn't take the same punnishment again. I actually scored the first fight to Romanov.Autobarn wrote:Do you reckon Earl could ever repeat that win over Romanov? ie with Romanov keeping active, winning 2x EBU fights via KO, etcPhenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Earls win over Romanov is better than anyone Thaxtons beat BUT Thaxton maybe the better and may beat Earl. Would we expect Thaxton to beat Katsidis? Probably not.
OOPS, replied to the wrong post...
a case could be made for Yuri winning that fight. Yuri landed the better shots, whereas Earl controlled the pace over the first 2/3Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Even though you weren't replying to me NO. Romanov is better now and he was rusty against Earl, Earl is probably past his best and probably couldn't take the same punnishment again. I actually scored the first fight to Romanov.Autobarn wrote:Do you reckon Earl could ever repeat that win over Romanov? ie with Romanov keeping active, winning 2x EBU fights via KO, etcPhenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Earls win over Romanov is better than anyone Thaxtons beat BUT Thaxton maybe the better and may beat Earl. Would we expect Thaxton to beat Katsidis? Probably not.
OOPS, replied to the wrong post...
Earl was unbelievable that night - never seen him like that. But I actually thimk Yuri ruined him in those last 5 rounds where he just hammered him with massive shots.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Not seen the Vanzie fights but Ramanov beat Vanzie and Earl has a win over Ramanov.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Because he got 2 HUGE gifts against Vanzie to win/defend the title or because he lost to Burns or because he chose to vacate the British title or because he just got destroyed against Katsidis?Twisted Transistor wrote:Thaxton may beat Earl I agree but he won't be No 1 unless he beats Earl or Ealr retires.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Earls win over Romanov is better than anyone Thaxtons beat BUT Thaxton maybe the better and may beat Earl. Would we expect Thaxton to beat Katsidis? Probably not.
Hardly destroyed he was competitive against Kat and would of won If the fight went late I reckon.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
I also scored the fight for Romanov(by one round) and I feel if he had been active he probably would have stopped Earl , you could almost see Yuri shedding the rust before our eyes as he got better as the fight progressed . The fight was a toss up though and I don't think anyone could have a problem with somone scoring it for either fighter or scoring a draw .Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Even though you weren't replying to me NO. Romanov is better now and he was rusty against Earl, Earl is probably past his best and probably couldn't take the same punnishment again. I actually scored the first fight to Romanov.Autobarn wrote:Do you reckon Earl could ever repeat that win over Romanov? ie with Romanov keeping active, winning 2x EBU fights via KO, etcPhenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Earls win over Romanov is better than anyone Thaxtons beat BUT Thaxton maybe the better and may beat Earl. Would we expect Thaxton to beat Katsidis? Probably not.
OOPS, replied to the wrong post...
Last edited by BigEars on 02 Aug 2007, 10:34, edited 1 time in total.