Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
I had a narrow win for Hopkins, can't remember the exact score, a point or two probably. Hopkins landed harder and cleaner punches through most of the fight. I'm not from the Lederman school of scoring where whoever is busier wins a round whether they're landing or not.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
I don't recall Hopkins landing hard, clean punches after the first couple rounds. I do remember Calzaghe bending him over and hammering him doggy style while Bernard begged the ref for help.
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Hopkins barely did anything after the first few rounds and the notion that he was landing harder, cleanier punches throughout the fight is incorrect. I think a lot of people fallaciously assume that if a boxing master like BHop is being miserly with his punch output, he is at least being effective when he does throw.
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
114-113 hopkins
by memory i think i had hopkins winning 4 of the first 6 rounds and remember he had a knockdown too
prime for prime joe gets beat up
by memory i think i had hopkins winning 4 of the first 6 rounds and remember he had a knockdown too
prime for prime joe gets beat up
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
I had Joe by 1 point.
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Fair comment.boxerbob wrote:114-113 hopkins
by memory i think i had hopkins winning 4 of the first 6 rounds and remember he had a knockdown too
prime for prime joe gets beat up
I had the same score, but the other way. I could have easily been ok with Hopkins getting the verdict and I thought he might.
Calzaghe, best in his division, in his day, which isn't really saying a lot, in my opinion.
-
ryanst1982
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 67
- Joined: 04 Jul 2011, 16:12
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
But prime for prime what do you think would have been different. Joe still would have thrown more punches and I could never see Hopkins knocking him out. I feel Joe is and always would have been a wrong match up for b hop. Although if RJJ fought Joe in his prime its a different story
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Your idiotic posts here are the reason why most of the board dont bother with BOTP....lol maybe there wasnt a 168lb Tyson for him to fight.....your moronic statement is like saying I dont rate muhammed Ali he never beat a 220lb version of SRL........ the fact you have trouble understanding is Jeff lacey was billled as the 168lb Tyson and in his short frightning peak at 168 he was exactly that.....its just Calzaghe ruined him....being wise after the fact is typical of you......anyway good day and lets see how long it takes for your dunnie cleaning sheila mate runs here defending you! gday mate!Goodnight, Irene wrote:Not impressed, man.
Dont get too carried away. I dont recall him being in there with a 168lb Mike Tyson at any stage of his career. Great cardio helped his cause too, but he never had the competition on his CV to impress me that much.Thats not what he WAS though, was it? I dont see why Kessler is relevant. Hes one of Calzaghes best wins, but he never tested Calzaghes ability to recover from either a 1st-class puncher or finisher.
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Lacy was never Tyson. Anyone who's said that was either stupid or a Brit.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Mugabi is a Brit (surprise, surprise, right? LOL) but since he just called Lacy the SMW equivalent of Tyson, couldnt he be stupid as well?Diamond WEAPON wrote:![]()
Lacy was never Tyson. Anyone who's said that was either stupid or a Brit.
Its a shame my idiotic posts are driving people away from BOTP. However, Im sure the entertainment value of Mugabis idiotic posts, demonstrated above, will bring them back in droves.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Mugabi is a Brit (surprise, surprise, right? LOL) but since he just called Lacy the SMW equivalent of Tyson, couldnt he be stupid as well?Diamond WEAPON wrote:![]()
Lacy was never Tyson. Anyone who's said that was either stupid or a Brit.
Its a shame my idiotic posts are driving people away from BOTP. However, Im sure the entertainment value of Mugabis idiotic posts, demonstrated above, will bring them back in droves.
Mugabi is my hero, carrying internet grudges for years while studying at Oxford. As his maniacal rage takes to the keyboard, lets not forget he is also quite often driving while he posts. Talk about road rage.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Typing deluges of bile and boxing know-how is something Oxford graduates (even the ones who misspell words like, 'threshold,') are capable of 
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
I see from his thread in the other stuff forum that we can add spine chilling racist to his ever growing list of accomplishments.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Typing deluges of bile and boxing know-how is something Oxford graduates (even the ones who misspell words like, 'threshold,') are capable of
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I see from his thread in the other stuff forum that we can add spine chilling racist to his ever growing list of accomplishments.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Typing deluges of bile and boxing know-how is something Oxford graduates (even the ones who misspell words like, 'threshold,') are capable of
Im glad i made your spine tingle with my criticism of black people saad, than again a retard like you used to call me black in abusive pm's a while ago!? Anyway im glad i made your spine tingle......i thought only a spunk like urineie could do that to you....!
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
and who is this nobby come lately? Are you urinie and saado's gay love child??Diamond WEAPON wrote:![]()
Lacy was never Tyson. Anyone who's said that was either stupid or a Brit.
Anyway im off the smell in this forum is one of gaysex and australians sodomising kangaroos! Ill let u girls argue it out amongst yourselves!
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
You are a mental train wreck. Go do brain surgery on your sodomy-gimp or something and let the people who don't suffer from schizophrenia make the arguments.mugabi wrote:and who is this nobby come lately? Are you urinie and saado's gay love child??Diamond WEAPON wrote:![]()
Lacy was never Tyson. Anyone who's said that was either stupid or a Brit.Grow some balls mate as urinie might say and stop being a follower!
![]()
Anyway im off the smell in this forum is one of gaysex and australians sodomising kangaroos! Ill let u girls argue it out amongst yourselves!
I tend to give Calzaghe a lot more credit than my American peers, but the Lacy-Tyson stuff is one of the longest running dumb cliches to come about in these forums simply so mental midget Britons like yourself can feel good about one of your heroes in unnecessary fashion.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
That a boy, another tirade of bigotry delivered by the master troll. You rule!mugabi wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I see from his thread in the other stuff forum that we can add spine chilling racist to his ever growing list of accomplishments.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Typing deluges of bile and boxing know-how is something Oxford graduates (even the ones who misspell words like, 'threshold,') are capable ofDD Look at how she defends her man......isn't she fragrant?.....isn't she stoic..........do you give urinie a blowjob every night saad or is your mouth permanently glued to his manhood?.....just wondering it seems that way to the rest of us
![]()
Im glad i made your spine tingle with my criticism of black people saad, than again a retard like you used to call me black in abusive pm's a while ago!? Anyway im glad i made your spine tingle......i thought only a spunk like urineie could do that to you....!![]()
![]()
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Some of you gentlemen take this forum too serious or not serious enough.
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Diamond WEAPON wrote:You are a mental train wreck. Go do brain surgery on your sodomy-gimp or something and let the people who don't suffer from schizophrenia make the arguments.mugabi wrote:and who is this nobby come lately? Are you urinie and saado's gay love child??Diamond WEAPON wrote:![]()
Lacy was never Tyson. Anyone who's said that was either stupid or a Brit.Grow some balls mate as urinie might say and stop being a follower!
![]()
Anyway im off the smell in this forum is one of gaysex and australians sodomising kangaroos! Ill let u girls argue it out amongst yourselves!
I tend to give Calzaghe a lot more credit than my American peers, but the Lacy-Tyson stuff is one of the longest running dumb cliches to come about in these forums simply so mental midget Britons like yourself can feel good about one of your heroes in unnecessary fashion.
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Had it for Hopkins, but could have gone either way.
Effectively a draw, no real clear winner
Effectively a draw, no real clear winner
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
The wit of a classically-trained Oxford gent (posted whilst kite-surfing I am reliably-informed, no less). Harvard & Princeton are struggling to keep pace with OU's graduates.mugabi wrote:and who is this nobby come lately? Are you urinie and saado's gay love child??Diamond WEAPON wrote:![]()
Lacy was never Tyson. Anyone who's said that was either stupid or a Brit.Grow some balls mate as urinie might say and stop being a follower!
![]()
Anyway im off the smell in this forum is one of gaysex and australians sodomising kangaroos! Ill let u girls argue it out amongst yourselves!
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Had no complaints about the decision. Hopkins fought like an old man...which is quite hard to believe bearing in mind what he's achieved since then.
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Hopkins by 1 round. 114-113 if I remember correct.
-
King Carlos
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1123
- Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10
Re: Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins
Hopkins by at least 3 points the last time I scored it. Terrible fight, and terrible performance from both men, but regardless of the nature the fight took on during the latter parts, Hopkins was consistently landing the harder, cleaner blows while Joe slapped at arms, shoulders, and air for the most part. Not effective, scoring aggression in my book. Not to mention Hopkins had him hurt on no less than 3 occasions.