Re: Kubrat Pulev vs. Hughie Fury - 27 October 2018
Posted: 28 Oct 2018, 07:29
Pulev was Euro level years ago. He’s above that. You have to think the Euro guys now.
Even them are tough fights. But not as experienced as Pulev.
Pulev was Euro level years ago. He’s above that. You have to think the Euro guys now.
This is how I saw it. Shite fight. Hughie offered nothing other than those telegraphed overhand rights then ended in a clinch. I understand that he's young in HW terms but if he hasn't learned to throw a proper straight right hand by now (or a jab of any description) then I can't see him progressing beyond European level. Losing to Pulev is no disgrace, he's a top 10 HW - but that performance showed a number of serious shortcomings.handsofstone wrote: ↑27 Oct 2018, 19:12 That was absolute aids that, I had Pulev 117-111, terrible fight, both guys were awful and their timing and accuracy was minging, Hughie reminds me of Bugner, decent skillset but just hasn't got whats required to step it up when needed, bad start getting cut like that from a jab, on the eyelid too that's usually a finisher straight away but it held up well, where was Shades of Ali? zero jab just holding out the left all night and throwing piss poor predictable right hands over the top which sailed over the heads of Pulev just about every time although he did hurt him in the 8th with it, missed with about 100 others, lay on the ropes too much trying to draw Pulev in but as I said far too predictable, the holding from both men was relentless, every single exchange finished with a hug
Messy as fvck as well Pulev's punches landed weren't all that either but he was seen to be pressing, the ref was shite, the camera cutaways mid round were disgraceful, just a shite fight all round, Fury's tactics and timings were non existent, Joshua will smash Pulev to smithereens
That's what tall fighters do that are too scared to throw the jab. They use it to judge the distance against a shorter opponent.
I think Hughie should stick to what he is good at. He is not a bangerPredatorHayds wrote: ↑29 Oct 2018, 08:36 The problem with Fury was that he was light on his feet, he used his height and reach well but never sat down on his punches.
He was the opposite in this. Looked heavy, used hardky zero movement and just kept winging in in-accurate lazy right hands.
What was the game plan?
It was the equivalent of having a reliable Ferrari but deciding to take it off-roading in the mud.
And who could forget Pricey. It’s so frustrating, those guys should be using the jab as a ramrod, not pawing it out.Exoddus wrote: ↑30 Oct 2018, 04:20That's what tall fighters do that are too scared to throw the jab. They use it to judge the distance against a shorter opponent.
Seen it a million times but they never break the habit. Just go watch one of Audley Harrison's fights and you'll see another example of it.
tysons getting a lot of very positive publicity for hughie being 9-3'd by pulev?mickey1975 wrote: ↑30 Oct 2018, 03:43 Tyson seems to be getting a lot of very positive publicity for this fight, especially in America. The Rogan podcast helped a lot. It was brilliant.
Must have posted in the wrong thread.jamamb wrote: ↑30 Oct 2018, 05:08tysons getting a lot of very positive publicity for hughie being 9-3'd by pulev?mickey1975 wrote: ↑30 Oct 2018, 03:43 Tyson seems to be getting a lot of very positive publicity for this fight, especially in America. The Rogan podcast helped a lot. It was brilliant.
What channel was the Sexton fight again? Youtube?Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑16 Nov 2018, 14:41 Just in case anyone was wondering, the telecast on Channel 5 averaged 1,162,000 viewers. Not sure what it peaked.
This average was lower than the Sexton fight, which was a stoppage in half way through the fight. The Sexton fight also peaked 2.9m viewers.
Goes to show, really.
Channel 5, fury-Parker was YouTube ppv.Rob3_142 wrote: ↑20 Nov 2018, 17:10What channel was the Sexton fight again? Youtube?Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑16 Nov 2018, 14:41 Just in case anyone was wondering, the telecast on Channel 5 averaged 1,162,000 viewers. Not sure what it peaked.
This average was lower than the Sexton fight, which was a stoppage in half way through the fight. The Sexton fight also peaked 2.9m viewers.
Goes to show, really.
Yeh. Hughie vs. Sexton was Mick Hennessy’s Channel 5 return.MattCoke wrote: ↑20 Nov 2018, 17:16Channel 5, fury-Parker was YouTube ppv.Rob3_142 wrote: ↑20 Nov 2018, 17:10What channel was the Sexton fight again? Youtube?Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑16 Nov 2018, 14:41 Just in case anyone was wondering, the telecast on Channel 5 averaged 1,162,000 viewers. Not sure what it peaked.
This average was lower than the Sexton fight, which was a stoppage in half way through the fight. The Sexton fight also peaked 2.9m viewers.
Goes to show, really.
Yeh. But you have to buy AJ’a fights.
You cannot compare the 2.
I explained this very thing on my above post.nitro5912 wrote: ↑21 Nov 2018, 01:43You cannot compare the 2.
One is on free tv, one you have to pay £20 for.
V Parker AJ had 1.4million buys at 20quid.
Comparing Hughie to that would be his YouTube fight which was a disaster.
How many would AJ get if on free TV? And by free I mean not sky, ppv or BT sport?
I'm thinking more around the 1 million mark.
That's interesting. How many buys do you think WIlder-Fury will do on BT? I can't see it doing more than 250k.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑21 Nov 2018, 05:02I'm thinking more around the 1 million mark.
the 1.4 figure is a weekly channel viewing of Sky Sports Box Office channel, so that figure would likely be the people that bought it and then anyone of them that tuned in to the replays.