Re: Joshua made a huge mistake
Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 19:46
Wilder is bigger threat for AJ than aging Povetkin. Plus Povetkin is taylor-made for Joshua stylistically. He was eating uppercuts all night long against Eddie Chambers, so he will be an easy target for Joshua's murderous right uppercut. Even Wlad, who threw about 1 uppercut per 10 fights, hurt Povetkin with uppercuts a couple of times in the seventh round.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 11:22Povetkin is still tier one with Joshua. He's Joshua's biggest threat. The rest are all tier two. Wilder got outboxed by Szpilka and fatboy Ortiz.Tony1244 wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 11:15Good summary. Joshua is The Champion and this comes from a yank who is a Wilder fan.candyslim wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 05:22 I'm not writing off Parker but when you look at his performances it doesn't look good for him ...
Takam: I thought Parker won a close fight. You could make a case for Takam winning and he wasn't troubled by Parkers' power.
Ruiz: i thought Parker won a close fight. You could make a case for Ruiz winning and he wasn't troubled by Parkers' power.
Razvan Cojanu: Unlike Takam and Ruiz, Cojanu is a rather limited opponent. He didn't remotely threaten to win but he wasn't troubled by Parkers' power either.
Fury: Did rather kill the fight but if you take the literal view about boxing being the art of hitting without being hit, and about the number of punches landed, then there was only one winner and it wasn't Parker.
Now this is heavyweight boxing, anything can happen. Joshua still has a few unresolved questions, notably regarding his chin and his stamina, but realistically he is 20 and 0 with 100% Knockout ratio for a reason, If Parker doesn't have the power to bother those guys, I can't really see him as the man to expose AJ's deficiencies and relieve him of his titles.
tier one
Joshua
tier two
Wilder
tier three
Parker
Ruiz
Hughie
Povetkin
Pulev
Takam
Miller
Ortiz
Excellent points. I can't wait for all of this to flush out.Boxing Writer wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:47Wilder is bigger threat for AJ than aging Povetkin. Plus Povetkin is taylor-made for Joshua stylistically. He was eating uppercuts all night long against Eddie Chambers, so he will be an easy target for Joshua's murderous right uppercut. Even Wlad, who threw about 1 uppercut per 10 fights, hurt Povetkin with uppercuts a couple of times in the seventh round.
Povetkin is more skilled than Wilder and probably has better chin but that's it. Wilder is much taller, faster, he is really awkward fighter and he hits harder than Povetkin.
LMAO! Nice!
Povetkin currently has the deepest, best resume at HW. He's also extremely talented. He'd KO Wilder by getting on the inside. Wilder has been looking great against counter-punching plodders. Povetkin will not be hanging around on the outside like Stiverne and Ortiz.Badhusker wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:35Povetkin Tier 1? I am assuming you mean a juiced up Povetkin, not the guy that was non-competitive against Wlad.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:14 Wilder barely got past Ortiz. Got outboxed and almost KO'd. He's not a whole tier above Ortiz.
Tier 1: Povetkin, Joshua
Tier 2: Wilder, Ortiz, Parker, Pulev, Ruiz Jr.
Tier 3: Miller, Takam, Huey
Tier 4: Duhaupus, Browne, Whyte
Tier 5: Mansour, Breazeale, Kownacki, Kabayel, Charr, Chisora
Noteworthy prospects: Kuzmin, Hrgovic, Yoka, Dubois, ect.![]()
And Klitchko had a better resume than Joshua...Frazier had a better resume than Foreman, etc....so?Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:56Povetkin currently has the deepest, best resume at HW. He's also extremely talented. He'd KO Wilder by getting on the inside. Wilder has been looking great against counter-punching plodders. Povetkin will not be hanging around on the outside like Stiverne and Ortiz.Badhusker wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:35Povetkin Tier 1? I am assuming you mean a juiced up Povetkin, not the guy that was non-competitive against Wlad.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:14 Wilder barely got past Ortiz. Got outboxed and almost KO'd. He's not a whole tier above Ortiz.
Tier 1: Povetkin, Joshua
Tier 2: Wilder, Ortiz, Parker, Pulev, Ruiz Jr.
Tier 3: Miller, Takam, Huey
Tier 4: Duhaupus, Browne, Whyte
Tier 5: Mansour, Breazeale, Kownacki, Kabayel, Charr, Chisora
Noteworthy prospects: Kuzmin, Hrgovic, Yoka, Dubois, ect.![]()
Also, he was non-competitive against the best version of Klitschko who broke every rule in boxing by acting like a human octopus.
You can see the clear chasm in talent between Povetkin and Wilder. That's why I also talked about that. You zoomed in on my resume note. Try reading my whole post.oogiebe wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:58And Klitchko had a better resume than Joshua...Frazier had a better resume than Foreman, etc....so?Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:56Povetkin currently has the deepest, best resume at HW. He's also extremely talented. He'd KO Wilder by getting on the inside. Wilder has been looking great against counter-punching plodders. Povetkin will not be hanging around on the outside like Stiverne and Ortiz.
Also, he was non-competitive against the best version of Klitschko who broke every rule in boxing by acting like a human octopus.
Wlad was the same age when he fought Povetkin as Lewis was when he fought Vitali. He also had much longer career comparing to Lennox, and he took sustained beatings for 6 minutes against Purritty, 3 minutes against Brewster and 3 minutes against Sanders. Lewis never toolk sustained beatings like Wlad did. He was just knocked out twice with a single punch. So Wlad was probably even more washed-up than Lewis was at 37. Wlad definitely was on decline when he beat Povetkin.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:56Povetkin currently has the deepest, best resume at HW. He's also extremely talented. He'd KO Wilder by getting on the inside. Wilder has been looking great against counter-punching plodders. Povetkin will not be hanging around on the outside like Stiverne and Ortiz.Badhusker wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:35Povetkin Tier 1? I am assuming you mean a juiced up Povetkin, not the guy that was non-competitive against Wlad.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:14 Wilder barely got past Ortiz. Got outboxed and almost KO'd. He's not a whole tier above Ortiz.
Tier 1: Povetkin, Joshua
Tier 2: Wilder, Ortiz, Parker, Pulev, Ruiz Jr.
Tier 3: Miller, Takam, Huey
Tier 4: Duhaupus, Browne, Whyte
Tier 5: Mansour, Breazeale, Kownacki, Kabayel, Charr, Chisora
Noteworthy prospects: Kuzmin, Hrgovic, Yoka, Dubois, ect.![]()
Also, he was non-competitive against the best version of Klitschko who broke every rule in boxing by acting like a human octopus.
Great points! I have to agree. Povetkin should fight Ortiz...would make statement for one or both.Boxing Writer wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:06Wlad was the same age when he fought Povetkin as Lewis was when he fought Vitali. He also had much longer career comparing to Lennox, and he took sustained beatings for 6 minutes against Purritty, 3 minutes against Brewster and 3 minutes against Sanders. Lewis never toolk sustained beatings like Wlad did. He was just knocked out twice with a single punch. So Wlad was probably even more washed-up than Lewis was at 37. Wlad definitely was on decline when he beat Povetkin.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:56Povetkin currently has the deepest, best resume at HW. He's also extremely talented. He'd KO Wilder by getting on the inside. Wilder has been looking great against counter-punching plodders. Povetkin will not be hanging around on the outside like Stiverne and Ortiz.
Also, he was non-competitive against the best version of Klitschko who broke every rule in boxing by acting like a human octopus.
Povetkin himself started to decline at 37 too. He didn't look imppressive against Rudenko and Hammer. He isn't the same fighter he used to be.
You don't understand HW aging. That was a horrible comment.Boxing Writer wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:06Wlad was the same age when he fought Povetkin as Lewis was when he fought Vitali. He also had much longer career comparing to Lennox, and he took sustained beatings for 6 minutes against Purritty, 3 minutes against Brewster and 3 minutes against Sanders. Lewis never toolk sustained beatings like Wlad did. He was just knocked out twice with a single punch. So Wlad was probably even more washed-up than Lewis was at 37. Wlad definitely was on decline when he beat Povetkin.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:56Povetkin currently has the deepest, best resume at HW. He's also extremely talented. He'd KO Wilder by getting on the inside. Wilder has been looking great against counter-punching plodders. Povetkin will not be hanging around on the outside like Stiverne and Ortiz.
Also, he was non-competitive against the best version of Klitschko who broke every rule in boxing by acting like a human octopus.
Povetkin himself started to decline at 37 too. He didn't look imppressive against Rudenko and Hammer. He isn't the same fighter he used to be.
Povetkin would have a chance against Wilder, but only because Wilder doesn't use his jab like he should. Wilder can fight on the inside, but Povetkin is sneaky the way he dives in and throws hooks and over-hand rights. Wlad negated that easily by tying him up, but if you watch the fight, Povetkin gave him no choice. Wilder would probably catch him coming in. There is an outside chance Povetkin can duck under and catch Wilder like he did Perez, but doubtful. I think Ortiz is better than Povetkin over-all easily imo.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:05You can see the clear chasm in talent between Povetkin and Wilder. That's why I also talked about that. You zoomed in on my resume note. Try reading my whole post.oogiebe wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:58And Klitchko had a better resume than Joshua...Frazier had a better resume than Foreman, etc....so?Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:56
Povetkin currently has the deepest, best resume at HW. He's also extremely talented. He'd KO Wilder by getting on the inside. Wilder has been looking great against counter-punching plodders. Povetkin will not be hanging around on the outside like Stiverne and Ortiz.
Also, he was non-competitive against the best version of Klitschko who broke every rule in boxing by acting like a human octopus.
I'm sorry, remind me...how long ago did Klitchko fight Povetkin?Badhusker wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:13Povetkin would have a chance against Wilder, but only because Wilder doesn't use his jab like he should. Wilder can fight on the inside, but Povetkin is sneaky the way he dives in and throws hooks and over-hand rights. Wlad negated that easily by tying him up, but if you watch the fight, Povetkin gave him no choice. Wilder would probably catch him coming in. There is an outside chance Povetkin can duck under and catch Wilder like he did Perez, but doubtful. I think Ortiz is better than Povetkin over-all easily imo.
I disagree on Pulev fight being his best performance ever. It was a great performance because Pulev choose the wrong tactics - he tried to outfight a fighter with much bigger punching power. And Wlad got hit with good punches a lot more against Pulev than is any other succesfull title defense of his career. Wlad also was hurt by Pulev's jab at the beginning of round one - it was the first time when he was hurt since the first Samuel Peter fight.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:12You don't understand HW aging. That was a horrible comment.Boxing Writer wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:06Wlad was the same age when he fought Povetkin as Lewis was when he fought Vitali. He also had much longer career comparing to Lennox, and he took sustained beatings for 6 minutes against Purritty, 3 minutes against Brewster and 3 minutes against Sanders. Lewis never toolk sustained beatings like Wlad did. He was just knocked out twice with a single punch. So Wlad was probably even more washed-up than Lewis was at 37. Wlad definitely was on decline when he beat Povetkin.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 19:56
Povetkin currently has the deepest, best resume at HW. He's also extremely talented. He'd KO Wilder by getting on the inside. Wilder has been looking great against counter-punching plodders. Povetkin will not be hanging around on the outside like Stiverne and Ortiz.
Also, he was non-competitive against the best version of Klitschko who broke every rule in boxing by acting like a human octopus.
Povetkin himself started to decline at 37 too. He didn't look imppressive against Rudenko and Hammer. He isn't the same fighter he used to be.
After he defeated Povetkin, Klitschko goes on top put on a career-high performance against Pulev, the #2 HW at the time. Saying he was washed-up is so far from the mark that it's laughable.
You can say that about his fight with Joshua, but certainly not against Povetkin considering he goes on to put a career best performance after.
agree, wlad actually looked sh!t aside from all the kdsBoxing Writer wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:18I disagree on Pulev fight being his best performance ever. It was a great performance because Pulev choose the wrong tactics - he tried to outfight a fighter with much bigger punching power. And Wlad got hit with good punches a lot more against Pulev than is any other succesfull title defense of his career. Wlad also was hurt by Pulev's jab at the beginning of round one - it was the first time when he was hurt since the first Samuel Peter fight.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:12You don't understand HW aging. That was a horrible comment.Boxing Writer wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:06
Wlad was the same age when he fought Povetkin as Lewis was when he fought Vitali. He also had much longer career comparing to Lennox, and he took sustained beatings for 6 minutes against Purritty, 3 minutes against Brewster and 3 minutes against Sanders. Lewis never toolk sustained beatings like Wlad did. He was just knocked out twice with a single punch. So Wlad was probably even more washed-up than Lewis was at 37. Wlad definitely was on decline when he beat Povetkin.
Povetkin himself started to decline at 37 too. He didn't look imppressive against Rudenko and Hammer. He isn't the same fighter he used to be.
After he defeated Povetkin, Klitschko goes on top put on a career-high performance against Pulev, the #2 HW at the time. Saying he was washed-up is so far from the mark that it's laughable.
You can say that about his fight with Joshua, but certainly not against Povetkin considering he goes on to put a career best performance after.
True, however; my point is that those fights make me hesitate to pick Parker. I hate to say this in this way, but I saw those fights and I just believe those fighters wouldn't stand 5 rounds with either Joshua or Wilder, and maybe Ortiz and Povetkin (I can't believe I referenced Povetkin).
You do know he defended against guys like Leapai. Pulev was extremely legit and very dangerous as the #2 HW in the world. Guy is still in the top 10 currently.Boxing Writer wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:18I disagree on Pulev fight being his best performance ever. It was a great performance because Pulev choose the wrong tactics - he tried to outfight a fighter with much bigger punching power. And Wlad got hit with good punches a lot more against Pulev than is any other succesfull title defense of his career. Wlad also was hurt by Pulev's jab at the beginning of round one - it was the first time when he was hurt since the first Samuel Peter fight.Mexi-Box wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:12You don't understand HW aging. That was a horrible comment.Boxing Writer wrote: ↑10 Mar 2018, 20:06
Wlad was the same age when he fought Povetkin as Lewis was when he fought Vitali. He also had much longer career comparing to Lennox, and he took sustained beatings for 6 minutes against Purritty, 3 minutes against Brewster and 3 minutes against Sanders. Lewis never toolk sustained beatings like Wlad did. He was just knocked out twice with a single punch. So Wlad was probably even more washed-up than Lewis was at 37. Wlad definitely was on decline when he beat Povetkin.
Povetkin himself started to decline at 37 too. He didn't look imppressive against Rudenko and Hammer. He isn't the same fighter he used to be.
After he defeated Povetkin, Klitschko goes on top put on a career-high performance against Pulev, the #2 HW at the time. Saying he was washed-up is so far from the mark that it's laughable.
You can say that about his fight with Joshua, but certainly not against Povetkin considering he goes on to put a career best performance after.