BoxRec

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05

Bandog wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 09:42

apollo creed wrote: ↑18 Feb 2022, 17:30 Why doesn't Charlo and Bena try to get Andrade? Hearn did his job but he can't force fighters to fight Andrade.

At the end of the day Andrade is making good money on DAZN. Andrade should fight Jacobs and Ryder.

I guess it's about money, when you want it to be. Even guys in house won't fight him.

Charlo rejected $7 million for a one-fight deal and a chance to win another belt.
Canelo rejected $45 million for a one-fight deal.
Golovkin rejected a $25 million offer to unify at 160 out of fear of ruining a third Canelo fight.
Billy Joe Saunders tested positive for PEDs and was not interested in rescheduling.
Jaime Munguia didn’t even want to start any negotiations or activate his mandatory status.
And now Benavidez is clearly pricing himself out.

No one corroborated those sums you cited.

You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05

Bandog wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 09:42

I guess it's about money, when you want it to be. Even guys in house won't fight him.

Charlo rejected $7 million for a one-fight deal and a chance to win another belt.
Canelo rejected $45 million for a one-fight deal.
Golovkin rejected a $25 million offer to unify at 160 out of fear of ruining a third Canelo fight.
Billy Joe Saunders tested positive for PEDs and was not interested in rescheduling.
Jaime Munguia didn’t even want to start any negotiations or activate his mandatory status.
And now Benavidez is clearly pricing himself out.

No one corroborated those sums you cited.

You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.

Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.

https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05

Bandog wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 09:42

I guess it's about money, when you want it to be. Even guys in house won't fight him.

Charlo rejected $7 million for a one-fight deal and a chance to win another belt.
Canelo rejected $45 million for a one-fight deal.
Golovkin rejected a $25 million offer to unify at 160 out of fear of ruining a third Canelo fight.
Billy Joe Saunders tested positive for PEDs and was not interested in rescheduling.
Jaime Munguia didn’t even want to start any negotiations or activate his mandatory status.
And now Benavidez is clearly pricing himself out.

No one corroborated those sums you cited.

You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.

Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.

https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05
No one corroborated those sums you cited.

You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.

Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.

https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/

The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).

My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.

I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).

Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:57

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35

Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.

https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/

The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).

My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.

I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).

Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?

Shut down by EO!

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:00

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:57

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53
The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).

My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.

I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).

Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?

Shut down by EO!

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:09

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:00

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:57
Shut down by EO!

Article notes: "By Mohamed Horomtallah: Sampson Lewkowicz, David Benavidez’s promoter, stated".."

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35 Charlo rejected $7 million for a one-fight deal and a chance to win another belt.
Canelo rejected $45 million for a one-fight deal.
Golovkin rejected a $25 million offer to unify at 160 out of fear of ruining a third Canelo fight.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:27

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:09

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:00

Article notes: "By Mohamed Horomtallah: Sampson Lewkowicz, David Benavidez’s promoter, stated".."

Who is Mohamed Horomtallah?

And can you please provide the verbatim quote of Sampson Lewkowicz's actual words from that article?

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:32Read it yourself EO.

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:32You said there was no author...there was...

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:32There is nothing to posted in this thread proving those quoted points aren't true.

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 12:34 Oh, and by the way, Mohamed Horomtallah is a contributor with the boxingnews24.com among others. Many articles, etc.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑19 Feb 2022, 16:05
No one corroborated those sums you cited.

You’re claiming them to be fact, but they aren’t.

Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.

https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/

The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).

My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.

I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).

Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:10

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53

Bandog wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:35

Here's my source. Of course your superior knowlege is more credible.

https://www.boxingnews24.com/2022/02/an ... an-canelo/

The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).

My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.

I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).

Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?

Um, there's that oh wise one.

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:16

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:10

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53
The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).

My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.

I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).

Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?

Um, there's that oh wise one.

Anonymous also means not known to the public or an unremarkable person.

You'd never heard of Mohamed Horomtallah until this discussion.

He only has four Twitter followers.

apollo creed wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:40 EO loves dragging posters in his ocd traps. lol

He's like a biatch who loves teasing the sh.it out of guys. lol

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:16

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:10

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 11:53
The article is simply an opinion piece that does not contain any quotes whatsoever, was written by an anonymous author and was also posted to a website that publishes articles written by anyone (even someone like you).

My knowledge is more credible, because unlike you, I am always capable of providing interview transcripts and also videos of discussions from the proverbial horse’s mouth.

I’ll repeat what I clearly stated before, no one corroborated the monetary amounts that Andrade alleges – not even his own promoter (who was the person that supposedly made those offers).

Are desperately hoping that repeating the same big lie often enough will eventually displace people’s recollections of real-world truths?

Um, there's that oh wise one.

Anonymous also means not known to the public or an unremarkable person.

You'd never heard of Mohamed Horomtallah until this discussion.

He only has four Twitter followers.

English isn’t even my first language but I seem to have a better grasp of it than you do!

maverick23 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 15:22

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:16

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:10
Um, there's that oh wise one.

Anonymous also means not known to the public or an unremarkable person.

You'd never heard of Mohamed Horomtallah until this discussion.

He only has four Twitter followers.

English isn’t even my first language but I seem to have a better grasp of it than you do!

You might need to furnish yourself with a proper dictionary if you think that’s what anonymous also means.

oogiebe wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 15:29

maverick23 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 15:22

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 13:16
Anonymous also means not known to the public or an unremarkable person.

You'd never heard of Mohamed Horomtallah until this discussion.

He only has four Twitter followers.

English isn’t even my first language but I seem to have a better grasp of it than you do!

You might need to furnish yourself with a proper dictionary if you think that’s what anonymous also means.

Nah, he's just moving the goal posts and changing the rules as always. Let him have his fun. We don't want him to have a breakdown.

Boxingnews24 is one of the worst sites out there. Steer clear of it at all costs. It's not journalism; it's people with sub-100 IQs ranting bias-laden tripe.

Boxingnews24 is the equivelant of a bug eyed drunk sitting in the corner of a pub, writing his "thoughts" on the back of a beer mat.

Boxing News 24 is terrible. Agree it's just sensationalist crap to draw people in, get the comments flowing and make advertising revenue. A 'trash site' if you will for boxing, can;t stand it myself but each to their own.

In serious form, boxingnews24 is a joke. Their site is filled with random authors, and their standard authors are a joke as if they were selected personality arch types.

One is a Mayweather fan who says Pacquiao would get iced by Brandon Rios, the other is a Pacquiao fan who predicted Guerrero would destroy Mayweather.

Then there's a guy which is practically British Boxers > The World. The other is a Wilder fan boy, one is a Klitschko lover and the other a hater. Overall a joke of a site with no integrity what so ever.

All of the writers on there are actually Eddy Pronishev and David Rosenberg of ESB. They even changed ESB to look exactly like their other site. They even started writing the same articles, almost word for word, under a variety of fake names on ESB like Michael Collins.

Gilfoid, Williams, Mckay, Ambrose are all one and the same. They fabricate quotes, create fake news and even post material that is months old. I saw something they posted last week from David Price, using quotes from September of last year and passing it off as new.

Gave up reading articles on that site many years ago. Shambles

They post so much tripe, I unfollowed them a while back.

Stopped reading this sites shit years ago

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 21:17 tbf , boxingnews24 is a terrible website and that's been said for years, way before this thread. ive gotten after ruthy before for posting their stuff. its mostly a few guys using fake author names to publish bait pieces meant to trigger responses due to how stupid they are

Enlightened-One wrote: ↑21 Feb 2022, 04:37

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑20 Feb 2022, 21:17 tbf , boxingnews24 is a terrible website and that's been said for years, way before this thread. ive gotten after ruthy before for posting their stuff. its mostly a few guys using fake author names to publish bait pieces meant to trigger responses due to how stupid they are

100% agree with you.