Fury vs Hammer

tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Fury vs Hammer

Post by tiny_acres »

Ok the fight is official.Fury the WBO #1 contender will face WBO #4 contender Christian Hammer.

http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/tyson-f ... mer-274787

I see a 12 round ud for Fury.
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Freedom2013 »

Another small opponent for 6'9" Fury. :(

Hammer could easily make cruiserweight if he was in proper shape. Fury is avoiding opponents closer to his own size like Browne (who wanted the fight but was turned down) and Ustinov.

Hammer isn't a big puncher and has nothing that will trouble Fury.
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7478
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by jujigatame »

Good fight. I thought Fury would take on a C-lister like Oquendo or Leapai while he waits for Wlad, but Hammer is a solid opponent.

I strongly doubt Hammer could make CW. Against Airich he weighed in at a career low and was still 241. He's a big guy.

Ustinov is old and mediocre. Fury would batter him with ease.
ruin795
Cruiserweight
Posts: 73
Joined: 20 Jul 2010, 19:14

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by ruin795 »

Not a bad choice for Fury. I would have rather him taken on Lucas Browne or Charles Martin, but Im ok with this one.
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by cold187 »

excellent opponent
Charles martin hasn't beaten anyone, to be fighting American class fighter!!
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Freedom2013 »

ruin795 wrote:Not a bad choice for Fury. I would have rather him taken on Lucas Browne or Charles Martin, but Im ok with this one.
Both Martin and Browne are being avoided by protected fighters like Fury.
cold187 wrote:excellent opponent
Charles Martin hasn't beaten anyone, to be fighting American class fighter!!
He has talent though, Hammer does not.
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by cold187 »

Freedom2013 wrote:
ruin795 wrote:Not a bad choice for Fury. I would have rather him taken on Lucas Browne or Charles Martin, but Im ok with this one.
Both Martin and Browne are being avoided by protected fighters like Fury.
cold187 wrote:excellent opponent
Charles Martin hasn't beaten anyone, to be fighting American class fighter!!
He has talent though, Hammer does not.
how is fury protected. look at his opponents compared to martin and Browne

I smell a troll

and im not even a fury fan
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Yes We Can »

Freedom2013 wrote:
ruin795 wrote:Not a bad choice for Fury. I would have rather him taken on Lucas Browne or Charles Martin, but Im ok with this one.
Both Martin and Browne are being avoided by protected fighters like Fury.
cold187 wrote:excellent opponent
Charles Martin hasn't beaten anyone, to be fighting American class fighter!!
He has talent though, Hammer does not.
Browne arguably lost his fight against Rudnenko. He is not good, and he is not being avoided.

If i remember correctly Tyson clearly said whilst stood with Browne (who agreed BTW) that it wasn't a match either man benefits from until there was a championship belt on the line.

Fury has been protected, but he still has far better wins than either guy you mentioned. He and his team are playing th ABC game very well.
Cap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1513
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 11:44

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Cap »

Fury and his people are obviously waiting for Klitschko to show signs of serious decline. Better to bide his time and make easy money with Abell, Chisora and Hammer, than to take risks with anyone who might accidentally land a dream-crusher on Fury's jaw.

By the by, what's Pricey doing these days?
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Lackeos »

Christian Hammer is a pretty good opponent. Between Chisora, Cunningham, and Hammer; Fury is putting together the best resume of any heavyweight outside of Wlad. I support that a lot more than all of the other heavyweights who just talk a big game and never fight anyone.
TheWigwam
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 603
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 16:55

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by TheWigwam »

Why can't he fight Wlad next? Both are free are they not? Hammer is a decent opponent and if the Wlad fight is not possible then I'm not complaining :TU:
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Rexob »

Freedom2013 wrote:Another small opponent for 6'9" Fury. :(

Hammer could easily make cruiserweight if he was in proper shape. Fury is avoiding opponents closer to his own size like Browne (who wanted the fight but was turned down) and Ustinov.

Hammer isn't a big puncher and has nothing that will trouble Fury.

Yeah tiny 6.2, 249 pounds!
SteveO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1383
Joined: 31 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by SteveO »

TheWigwam wrote:Why can't he fight Wlad next? Both are free are they not? Hammer is a decent opponent and if the Wlad fight is not possible then I'm not complaining :TU:
Because Wlad is fighting Bryant Jennings (or TBA) on 25th April in New York.
Maybe Wlad and Fury will get in on sometime in the summer.
Last edited by SteveO on 24 Dec 2014, 16:11, edited 1 time in total.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Lackeos »

TheWigwam wrote:Why can't he fight Wlad next? Both are free are they not? Hammer is a decent opponent and if the Wlad fight is not possible then I'm not complaining :TU:
Last I read, Wlad wanted Jennings first and Stiverne - Wilder second. By the time he gets to Fury, Fury's gonna be a career-defining scalp.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by tiny_acres »

Lackeos wrote:
TheWigwam wrote:Why can't he fight Wlad next? Both are free are they not? Hammer is a decent opponent and if the Wlad fight is not possible then I'm not complaining :TU:
Last I read, Wlad wanted Jennings first and Stiverne - Wilder second. By the time he gets to Fury, Fury's gonna be a career-defining scalp.
I agree if Fury were to wait until mid to late 2016.He will have had 3-5 more ranked opponents
under his belt.The money from this fight would be incredible.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Horse »

Hammer is a decent opponent.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by mullenman »

I know this fight is booked but!!!

wlad is having problems with jennings signing for his april fight in america
if they offered the fight to tyson he would take it in a second
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Rexob »

mullenman wrote:I know this fight is booked but!!!

wlad is having problems with jennings signing for his april fight in america
if they offered the fight to tyson he would take it in a second

Hope so would be a fun week out in USA :TU:
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by tiny_acres »

mullenman wrote:I know this fight is booked but!!!

wlad is having problems with jennings signing for his april fight in america
if they offered the fight to tyson he would take it in a second
I don't think Wlad would take this fight yet.Fury is his mandatory.Wlad has to
sign by the end of May.
I think Wlad will offer step aside money to Fury so he can face Wilder/Stiverne winner.
Fury won't get a shot in my opinion until 2016.
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by cold187 »

mullenman wrote:I know this fight is booked but!!!

wlad is having problems with jennings signing for his april fight in america
if they offered the fight to tyson he would take it in a second
and what mysterious problems are these.
Jennings is getting a 7 figure payday last i heard. and also heard from his mouth the fight is confirmed just ironing out few little things around the fight rather than negotiations.

in all likely hood likely to be announced after wilder/stiverne fight
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by punchoutsb »

Good fight. Right where Fury should be, as Hammer is a solid opponent.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by HomicideHenry »

Not a bad choice. The man was the former WBO European Champion, and has had some good wins. The only real issue that I have is that he is 6'2"... I don't necessarily buy into the claim from Hammer that he likes to fight taller men, because he was kayoed in six rounds by the 6'7" Mariusz Wach... but that being said, he does meet the requirements: #4 WBO rating, top European heavyweight, has a solid record against decent/good names, and this contest will be for the WBO International championship.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9468
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by tiny_acres »

HomicideHenry wrote:Not a bad choice. The man was the former WBO European Champion, and has had some good wins. The only real issue that I have is that he is 6'2"... I don't necessarily buy into the claim from Hammer that he likes to fight taller men, because he was kayoed in six rounds by the 6'7" Mariusz Wach... but that being said, he does meet the requirements: #4 WBO rating, top European heavyweight, has a solid record against decent/good names, and this contest will be for the WBO International championship.
in Hammers defense. He had 8 fights when he fought the 22-0 Wach.HE has improved since then
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by crusader »

jujigatame wrote:Good fight. I thought Fury would take on a C-lister like Oquendo or Leapai while he waits for Wlad, but Hammer is a solid opponent.

I strongly doubt Hammer could make CW. Against Airich he weighed in at a career low and was still 241. He's a big guy.

Ustinov is old and mediocre. Fury would batter him with ease.
I suspect that Fury will batter Hammer with ease. He has a decent record but I wouldn't say he's much beyond mediocre if Ustinov is the standard for that. I also don't think he has any attributes that will trouble Fury or make the bout interesting given that he's a fairly small HW, isn't notably fast or skillful, and lacks power, while Ustinov can at least match Fury for size and aside from Wlad is the only person to hurt Pulev as a pro.

That said, Fury could've just sat on his title shot so I don't have problems with him fighting Hammer.
Last edited by crusader on 24 Dec 2014, 18:52, edited 1 time in total.
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Fury vs Hammer

Post by Freedom2013 »

Rexob wrote:
Freedom2013 wrote:Another small opponent for 6'9" Fury. :(

Hammer could easily make cruiserweight if he was in proper shape. Fury is avoiding opponents closer to his own size like Browne (who wanted the fight but was turned down) and Ustinov.

Hammer isn't a big puncher and has nothing that will trouble Fury.

Yeah tiny 6.2, 249 pounds!
Fat isn't the same as big.

Hammers a much smaller fat guy.
Post Reply