frampton tv twist

donal
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 40
Joined: 31 May 2008, 05:16

frampton tv twist

Post by donal »

reports from ireland suggest that frampton next fight with avalos is heading for an online ppv stream rather than sky, allegedly or others suggested - this means the promoters would collect a wedge of coin directly but streams are not easily accessed for everyone. the undercard could also suffer off this with more latvians taken over.

what you guys think?
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1080
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by ScottDetonator »

Going to be tough going up against the Fury card on the same night.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Would it not make more sense to just postpone the fight for 2 weeks and then they'll have more of a choice for TV?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23241
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by handsofstone »

I effing hate watching boxing online,my laptop's just broke and that was small enough now I've got my daughter's tiny tablet,its gonna be brutal

Even posting on here's a nightmare with the tab
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by mullenman »

If that is true I won't buy it

fury card on allegedly for me

sound like barry has messed up
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by brian13 »

The last time this happened was Froch / Taylor and I don't think that did particularly well.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by DMA1987 »

Clearly mistaking being massive in Ireland for being massive anywhere else.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Is the fight being shown live in ireland and any coverage for the us?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32992
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Bad news if true, my internet is with Sky & is slow as fvck, no way would I buy it with my shitty connection. Only PPV I ever bought online was Froch vs Taylor, but that was in my old house which was on awesome Virgin broadband.
donal
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 40
Joined: 31 May 2008, 05:16

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by donal »

they got rid of belfast legend gerry storey so no other trainer would take a cut of the cash, they set up there own promotion company so matchroom wouldn't take a cut of the cash now they going for the direct cash flow online.

milking the cow
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by Sklar »

How many of you know how much Frampton and his promoter would get if the fight was on Sky or BN?
donal
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 40
Joined: 31 May 2008, 05:16

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by donal »

dont know but with the usual back handers from north of ireland government i reckon they do ok
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Ridiculous move if true...then again I'm not too sure Barry really knows what he's doing...and for those saying "Well he took Frampton to a world title" I dare say almost any promoter with a kid that good could had a world champion on their hands...
cobbler80
Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 04:42

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by cobbler80 »

Why would anyone pay for an online stream when free streams are so easy to use?

Terrible decision if true
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Sklar wrote:How many of you know how much Frampton and his promoter would get if the fight was on Sky or BN?
This
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by expe »

cobbler80 wrote:Why would anyone pay for an online stream when free streams are so easy to use?

Terrible decision if true
Why would anyone pay for Sky PPV when free streams are so easy to use?
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by palooka »

I'm not paying any more SKY ppv, it's my new years resolution - it's ridiculous that ordinary people living ordinary lives worry about whether promoters, television execs and professional sportsmen earn enough and feel guilty over their plight they'll pay an extra £15 to help them out.
Lenny Cravats
Super Middleweight
Posts: 8100
Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by Lenny Cravats »

expe wrote:
cobbler80 wrote:Why would anyone pay for an online stream when free streams are so easy to use?

Terrible decision if true
Why would anyone pay for Sky PPV when free streams are so easy to use?
Well if you've got one of those nice TV's, I can see why. I don't. Don't even have a telly.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by palooka »

It won't take you long before you get things more comfortable :TU:
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by expe »

Boxing Prospect wrote:Ridiculous move if true...then again I'm not too sure Barry really knows what he's doing...and for those saying "Well he took Frampton to a world title" I dare say almost any promoter with a kid that good could had a world champion on their hands...
People said he didn't know what he was doing when he took Frampton away from Sky and Matchroom. He got a TV deal, eliminator for the IBF, then the WBC, brought Martinez over for a voluntary, the Odyssey wasn't big enough for the fight, so they built a stadium capable of hosting it. He's done a great job so far, guided him from the day he turned pro to selling out arenas and a world title. This, if true, is a bit of a left field move, but he's done everything right so far, so I'll hold off on criticising him for it until we find out more about how it will work, if it brings in more than having the fight on Sky or allegedly would, he's done a good job.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by TheCobra »

Barry's played it ok so far but this is a dick move. If he can't get the TV situation sorted for a world title fight when Frampton is just about ready to hit the big time, then he really has stuffed it up.

allegedly or Sky, that's the choices and that's who you have to work with if you want your fights on decent TV coverage in the UK.
cobbler80
Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 04:42

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by cobbler80 »

expe wrote:
cobbler80 wrote:Why would anyone pay for an online stream when free streams are so easy to use?

Terrible decision if true
Why would anyone pay for Sky PPV when free streams are so easy to use?
Because you're watching it in good quality on a TV rather than on a laptop

If i'm gonna watch it on a shitty laptop stream i definitely aint paying for it

I'm sure you can watch PPV illegally through your TV too but i've no idea about that to be honest. Tech spaz unfortunately
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by expe »

cobbler80 wrote:
expe wrote:
cobbler80 wrote:Why would anyone pay for an online stream when free streams are so easy to use?

Terrible decision if true
Why would anyone pay for Sky PPV when free streams are so easy to use?
Because you're watching it in good quality on a TV rather than on a laptop

If i'm gonna watch it on a shitty laptop stream i definitely aint paying for it

I'm sure you can watch PPV illegally through your TV too but i've no idea about that to be honest. Tech spaz unfortunately
They can stream live over the internet in HD perfectly easily with no difference in picture quality.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by JimJim2009 »

TheCobra wrote:Barry's played it ok so far but this is a dick move. If he can't get the TV situation sorted for a world title fight when Frampton is just about ready to hit the big time, then he really has stuffed it up.

allegedly or Sky, that's the choices and that's who you have to work with if you want your fights on decent TV coverage in the UK.
I imagine the issue of options is decisive in a situation like this, any broadcaster who gives Barry a decent fee for a one fight deal would be shortsighted; they just get a single night of boxing. For a fighter like Frampton, I can see sky and BN demanding options on Carl's next few fights too.

This situation highlights the pitfalls of announcing the show before you have a broadcast partner.

good luck to Barry and Carl but I hope this online PPV attempt is a total disaster. We pay to sky and to BN, the last thing we as fans need is for other promoters to do this. In the month of feb, fans will pay forty to fifty to sky for sky sports, and 12 to BN. It's asking too much expect us to fork out a third charge, for a single show. It is a nothing fight, it's not like he is facing Rigondeux or Quigg.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: frampton tv twist

Post by expe »

JimJim2009 wrote:
TheCobra wrote:Barry's played it ok so far but this is a dick move. If he can't get the TV situation sorted for a world title fight when Frampton is just about ready to hit the big time, then he really has stuffed it up.

allegedly or Sky, that's the choices and that's who you have to work with if you want your fights on decent TV coverage in the UK.
I imagine the issue of options is decisive in a situation like this, any broadcaster who gives Barry a decent fee for a one fight deal would be shortsighted; they just get a single night of boxing. For a fighter like Frampton, I can see sky and BN demanding options on Carl's next few fights too.

This situation highlights the pitfalls of announcing the show before you have a broadcast partner.

good luck to Barry and Carl but I hope this online PPV attempt is a total disaster. We pay to sky and to BN, the last thing we as fans need is for other promoters to do this. In the month of feb, fans will pay forty to fifty to sky for sky sports, and 12 to BN. It's asking too much expect us to fork out a third charge, for a single show. It is a nothing fight, it's not like he is facing Rigondeux or Quigg.
We still don't actually know what they're doing with it, the price or how it will work. I'd much rather see this than them go back to Sky.
Post Reply