Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
floyd is on his way out with the ridicule berto fight, manny is out too.
so who is left.....
so who is left.....
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
If Golovkin remained at 160 he is a walkup for P4P #1 next year.Chepppaaa wrote:floyd is on his way out with the ridicule berto fight, manny is out too.
so who is left.....
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
bogan whisperer wrote:If Golovkin remained at 160 he is a walkup for P4P #1 next year.Chepppaaa wrote:floyd is on his way out with the ridicule berto fight, manny is out too.
so who is left.....
the winner of loma-rigo will also play a role. i mean gold medalist, technicly both are superior to ggg. if rigondeaux wins, it is a no brainer, i mean undefeated, wins over prime donaire and lomachenko and on top techicly superior to any boser out there expect floyd, i mean thats simply > ggg. but, golovkin is up there 2-4.
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
GGG in a landslide..Kovalev not too distant number 2.
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
GGG
Rigo Loma winner
Kova
Gonzlez
Crawford
Rigo Loma winner
Kova
Gonzlez
Crawford
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
Aren't we still in 2015 ?
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
Terrible poll.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45214
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
Floyd will still be fighting in 2016 - so it will be him.Chepppaaa wrote:floyd is on his way out with the ridicule berto fight, manny is out too.
so who is left.....
If you really believe he is going to retire at 49-0 rather than beating Marciano's record, then you're bonkers.
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
:??Chepppaaa wrote:the winner of loma-rigo will also play a role.
What?
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
Why no Wladimir Klitschsko option?
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
I am curious as to why Lara is an option?
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
If GGG continues at 160lbs then by next year he'll still have fought no-one worthy of a p4p no1 ranking.bogan whisperer wrote:If Golovkin remained at 160 he is a walkup for P4P #1 next year.Chepppaaa wrote:floyd is on his way out with the ridicule berto fight, manny is out too.
so who is left.....
I think GGG has the tools to be p4p no1 but until he at very least gets the top guys in his division to fight him, let alone moving weights to fight the best, he'll not be given credit (and rightly so) that takes you to no1 ranking.
Lets not forget p4p are largely down to opinions and the people that make these decisions need convincing.
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
The same reason Stevenson and Thurman are in there presumably.tiny_acres wrote:I am curious as to why Lara is an option?
Not one of those 3 names are the best in their division let alone p4p
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9468
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
You are 100% right. I have just been amazed at all the love Lara is getting and he does notdavie wrote:The same reason Stevenson and Thurman are in there presumably.tiny_acres wrote:I am curious as to why Lara is an option?
Not one of those 3 names are the best in their division let alone p4p
have a single defining win.
-
bogan whisperer
- Middleweight
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
The only thing in the way of GGG moving up to P4P #1 is the reluctance of prospective opponents fighting him.davie wrote:If GGG continues at 160lbs then by next year he'll still have fought no-one worthy of a p4p no1 ranking.bogan whisperer wrote:If Golovkin remained at 160 he is a walkup for P4P #1 next year.Chepppaaa wrote:floyd is on his way out with the ridicule berto fight, manny is out too.
so who is left.....
I think GGG has the tools to be p4p no1 but until he at very least gets the top guys in his division to fight him, let alone moving weights to fight the best, he'll not be given credit (and rightly so) that takes you to no1 ranking.
Lets not forget p4p are largely down to opinions and the people that make these decisions need convincing.
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
I think if Rigo dominates Lomo, like I predict, he should be no longer ignored by so many as a top pfp boxer.
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
tiny_acres wrote:You are 100% right. I have just been amazed at all the love Lara is getting and he does notdavie wrote:The same reason Stevenson and Thurman are in there presumably.tiny_acres wrote:I am curious as to why Lara is an option?
Not one of those 3 names are the best in their division let alone p4p
have a single defining win.
paul williams and canelo alvarez
and if you rewatch both fights and still think he lost both than u know 0 about boxing
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
13 people voted for ggg as the future #1 boxer in the world
i cant believe this, i am realy far away from a boxing forum with guys who know boxing.
how can you rate somebody as #1 when he so technicly limited and limited in terms of speed and athletic ability?
i mean ggg is tough and strong and yes, he is by far the best middleweight in the world, but he can never be any better than a p4p top 2-4.
as long as there are technicly, fast and athleticly superior guys like rigondeaux or lara in town ggg is 2 >
i cant believe this, i am realy far away from a boxing forum with guys who know boxing.
how can you rate somebody as #1 when he so technicly limited and limited in terms of speed and athletic ability?
i mean ggg is tough and strong and yes, he is by far the best middleweight in the world, but he can never be any better than a p4p top 2-4.
as long as there are technicly, fast and athleticly superior guys like rigondeaux or lara in town ggg is 2 >
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
...I don't expect any major changes in 2016...
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
greg wrote:...I don't expect any major changes in 2016...
so in 2016 or end of 2016 floyd will still be boxing and be #1 after his close win over pac and a ud win over berto
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
...I don't know, I just guess if he keeps fighting and wins which is something I would expect, he'll retain his status..Chepppaaa wrote:greg wrote:...I don't expect any major changes in 2016...
so in 2016 or end of 2016 floyd will still be boxing and be #1 after his close win over pac and a ud win over berto
-
HyacinthusTurnipseed
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 16:34
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
Treating this idea as it was intended, in a post-Floyd world there will likely be no consensus for a while on who is #1 (as this thread suggests), and it would depend on exactly what fights get made in the near future as who pulls out in front. What if a Bradley-Crawford suddenly gets made and Terence stops him inside 7? Gonzalez-Inoue? Golovkin-Alvarez? Golovkin-Ward? Kovalev-Stevenson? Thurman-Brook? What if Rigondeaux's career continues to stall? Most of us who do p4p lists try to incorporate recent resume in with who we happen to think would win "if everyone was the same weight", so questions like the above play a massive role in determining who we'll go for.
As it stands now, if Floyd retired tomorrow (why would he? But still if he did) my own top 5 would probably be Rigo, Gonz, Kov, GGG and Crawford, but I don't see any problem with shuffling around the first four of those names into some different order as it stands now.
Golovkin is as technically gifted as anyone, he is just more aggressive. His handspeed may not be khanesque but he is fast enough. His opponents are always desperate to stop him punching them in the face and body and yet he lands on all of them cleanly and regularly thanks to his awesome Ring IQ, accuracy, balance, knowledge of angles and punch variety. He is more-or-less as good as Rigo at what he does.
As it stands now, if Floyd retired tomorrow (why would he? But still if he did) my own top 5 would probably be Rigo, Gonz, Kov, GGG and Crawford, but I don't see any problem with shuffling around the first four of those names into some different order as it stands now.
Golovkin is as technically gifted as anyone, he is just more aggressive. His handspeed may not be khanesque but he is fast enough. His opponents are always desperate to stop him punching them in the face and body and yet he lands on all of them cleanly and regularly thanks to his awesome Ring IQ, accuracy, balance, knowledge of angles and punch variety. He is more-or-less as good as Rigo at what he does.
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
If Floyd retires I'll pick Andre ward ,if he starts fighting regularly again ,unlike GGG or kovalev he doesn't need a big divining fight as he has already cleared out his weight class plus he's got some big fights at light heavyweight if he wants them vs kovalev and Stevenson which is think he'd win plus I think he'd beat GGG as well....for me rigo has lots of talent but he isn't having big fights
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
stevedoc wrote:If Floyd retires I'll pick Andre ward ,if he starts fighting regularly again ,unlike GGG or kovalev he doesn't need a big divining fight as he has already cleared out his weight class plus he's got some big fights at light heavyweight if he wants them vs kovalev and Stevenson which is think he'd win plus I think he'd beat GGG as well....for me rigo has lots of talent but he isn't having big fights
yes. if ward realy would be as succesful at lh as he was at sm, than he would be a clear cut #1
Re: Who is the #1 p4p Boxer in 2016?
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Floyd will still be fighting in 2016 - so it will be him.Chepppaaa wrote:floyd is on his way out with the ridicule berto fight, manny is out too.
so who is left.....
If you really believe he is going to retire at 49-0 rather than beating Marciano's record, then you're bonkers.
Hasn't Marciano's record already broken? Ricardo Lopez 51-0-1? Maybe you are talking about unblemished record, or maybe its just that the really small guys don't count.