Who was more impressive: Kell Brook or Andre Ward?
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Who was more impressive: Kell Brook or Andre Ward?
Ward beat a fringe contender IBF mandatory by UD.
Brook beat a fringe contender IBF mandatory by KO 2.
Who was more impressive?
Also take into consideration Ward resorted to illegal tactics (hitting after the bell, holding, and a deliberate low blow thrown with bad intentions). Brook did not need to foul.
Brook beat a fringe contender IBF mandatory by KO 2.
Who was more impressive?
Also take into consideration Ward resorted to illegal tactics (hitting after the bell, holding, and a deliberate low blow thrown with bad intentions). Brook did not need to foul.
Last edited by Freedom2013 on 27 Mar 2016, 02:33, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
Brook no question. Brook needs to start trying to unify. If he is being avoided then he needs to get that out there. I would love to see him fight Garcia. But once again you have to take a lot of things in consideration there.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
They were both impressive.Freedom2013 wrote:Ward beat a fringe contender IBF mandatory by UD.
Brook beat a fringe contender IBF mandatory by KO 2.
Who was more impressive today?
Also take into consideration Ward resorted to illegal tactics (hitting after the bell, holding, and a deliberate low blow thrown with bad intentions). Brook did not need to foul.
I have been as critical as any (objective) person of Ward. He was masterful tonight. Bizier does not compare to Barrera, and you know it.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
I am glad you have been critical of Ward to make up for the HBO announcing team which had cheerleader uniforms on tonight with AW across their chest. Their straight rooting for ward was actually embarrassing. I thought I was back in Europe again because that is how every fight is announced over there.Tanzio wrote:They were both impressive.Freedom2013 wrote:Ward beat a fringe contender IBF mandatory by UD.
Brook beat a fringe contender IBF mandatory by KO 2.
Who was more impressive today?
Also take into consideration Ward resorted to illegal tactics (hitting after the bell, holding, and a deliberate low blow thrown with bad intentions). Brook did not need to foul.
I have been as critical as any (objective) person of Ward. He was masterful tonight. Bizier does not compare to Barrera, and you know it.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
I watch fights with the volume turned down.Lancenix wrote:I am glad you have been critical of Ward to make up for the HBO announcing team which had cheerleader uniforms on tonight with AW across their chest. Their straight rooting for ward was actually embarrassing. I thought I was back in Europe again because that is how every fight is announced over there.Tanzio wrote:They were both impressive.Freedom2013 wrote:Ward beat a fringe contender IBF mandatory by UD.
Brook beat a fringe contender IBF mandatory by KO 2.
Who was more impressive today?
Also take into consideration Ward resorted to illegal tactics (hitting after the bell, holding, and a deliberate low blow thrown with bad intentions). Brook did not need to foul.
I have been as critical as any (objective) person of Ward. He was masterful tonight. Bizier does not compare to Barrera, and you know it.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
That is what I had to do tonight around round 6. Roy Jones was so annoying.Tanzio wrote:I watch fights with the volume turned down.Lancenix wrote:I am glad you have been critical of Ward to make up for the HBO announcing team which had cheerleader uniforms on tonight with AW across their chest. Their straight rooting for ward was actually embarrassing. I thought I was back in Europe again because that is how every fight is announced over there.Tanzio wrote: They were both impressive.
I have been as critical as any (objective) person of Ward. He was masterful tonight. Bizier does not compare to Barrera, and you know it.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
What is funny is that Ward is one of the best (most objective) boxing commentators.Lancenix wrote:That is what I had to do tonight around round 6. Roy Jones was so annoying.Tanzio wrote:I watch fights with the volume turned down.Lancenix wrote:
I am glad you have been critical of Ward to make up for the HBO announcing team which had cheerleader uniforms on tonight with AW across their chest. Their straight rooting for ward was actually embarrassing. I thought I was back in Europe again because that is how every fight is announced over there.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
Ward is objective I agree. I find him a touch boring and not as good as Bernard Hopkins or Virgil Hunter. I really like Virgil Hunter as far as US announcers go.Tanzio wrote:What is funny is that Ward is one of the best (most objective) boxing commentators.Lancenix wrote:That is what I had to do tonight around round 6. Roy Jones was so annoying.Tanzio wrote: I watch fights with the volume turned down.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
Good point. I really enjoy listening to both BHop and Hunter. Virgil actually gives Khan a relatively decent chance (30%) v GingerHead, IMO.Lancenix wrote:Ward is objective I agree. I find him a touch boring and not as good as Bernard Hopkins or Virgil Hunter. I really like Virgil Hunter as far as US announcers go.Tanzio wrote:What is funny is that Ward is one of the best (most objective) boxing commentators.Lancenix wrote: That is what I had to do tonight around round 6. Roy Jones was so annoying.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
I didn't watch Brook, but ward has to be the answer based on the opponents.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
Virgil gives his own fighter that low of a chance? That's horrendous heading into a fight, though I agree with those odds, but it doesn't get more objective than that.Tanzio wrote:Good point. I really enjoy listening to both BHop and Hunter. Virgil actually gives Khan a relatively decent chance (30%) v GingerHead, IMO.Lancenix wrote:Ward is objective I agree. I find him a touch boring and not as good as Bernard Hopkins or Virgil Hunter. I really like Virgil Hunter as far as US announcers go.Tanzio wrote: What is funny is that Ward is one of the best (most objective) boxing commentators.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
That makes me feel good about Kahn's chances seeing as he is fighting at his highest weight and moving up a class. I respect what he has to say.Tanzio wrote:Good point. I really enjoy listening to both BHop and Hunter. Virgil actually gives Khan a relatively decent chance (30%) v GingerHead, IMO.Lancenix wrote:Ward is objective I agree. I find him a touch boring and not as good as Bernard Hopkins or Virgil Hunter. I really like Virgil Hunter as far as US announcers go.Tanzio wrote: What is funny is that Ward is one of the best (most objective) boxing commentators.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
You feel better about Khan's chances because his trainer gives him a 30% chance? Man, your stupidity challenges your cowardice.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
I did not communicate that clearly. Hunter did not say that. I think that Hunter as a trainer gives Khan a 30% chance.Lancenix wrote:That makes me feel good about Kahn's chances seeing as he is fighting at his highest weight and moving up a class. I respect what he has to say.Tanzio wrote:Good point. I really enjoy listening to both BHop and Hunter. Virgil actually gives Khan a relatively decent chance (30%) v GingerHead, IMO.Lancenix wrote:
Ward is objective I agree. I find him a touch boring and not as good as Bernard Hopkins or Virgil Hunter. I really like Virgil Hunter as far as US announcers go.
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
About the same, actually.Tanzio wrote:They were both impressive.
I have been as critical as any (objective) person of Ward. He was masterful tonight. Bizier does not compare to Barrera, and you know it.
Sullivan Barrera: Boxrec #23 at 175 going into the fight.
Kevin Bizier: Boxrec #20 at 147 going into the fight.
Do you consider welterweight a weak division?
Bizier has faced better competition as a pro and is younger than Barrera. Barrera is not on any top ten list I've seen (Ring, Boxrec, Transnational).
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
He is downplaying Kahn's chances. I think we can all admit that on paper it is not a 50-50 fight. So where does it fall? 60-40? Even that is a little high. So I take the 30-70 and I am saying he is downplaying here knowing that kahn can outbox him. Kahn is not gonna sit there like Kirkland did. We know that. Will he run as much as Lara? No. Can he put up a better fight than Cotto? i think so and Cotto had that fight much closer than the HBO announcers gave him credit for. If Kahn boxes and moves I know he can win that fight.Tanzio wrote:I did not communicate that clearly. Hunter did not say that. I think that Hunter as a trainer gives Khan a 30% chance.Lancenix wrote:That makes me feel good about Kahn's chances seeing as he is fighting at his highest weight and moving up a class. I respect what he has to say.Tanzio wrote: Good point. I really enjoy listening to both BHop and Hunter. Virgil actually gives Khan a relatively decent chance (30%) v GingerHead, IMO.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
Nice numbers. You've got me there, but Barrera is more competitive according to my eye test. Bizier would have little to no chance v Porter. Barrera would give Fonfara all that he could handle, imo.Freedom2013 wrote:About the same, actually.Tanzio wrote:They were both impressive.
I have been as critical as any (objective) person of Ward. He was masterful tonight. Bizier does not compare to Barrera, and you know it.
Sullivan Barrera: Boxrec #23 at 175 going into the fight.
Kevin Bizier: Boxrec #20 at 147 going into the fight.
Do you consider welterweight a weak division?![]()
Bizier has faced better competition as a pro and is younger than Barrera. Barrera is not on any top ten list I've seen (Ring, Boxrec, Transnational).
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
I was hoping until the fight with Ward was signed Kovalev would get Barrera for a nice KO win.Tanzio wrote:Nice numbers. You've got me there, but Barrera is more competitive according to my eye test. Bizier would have little to no chance v Porter. Barrera would give Fonfara all that he could handle, imo.
Sergey wouldn't need to hit after hearing the bell, deliberately head butt (good that the ref tonight warned Ward about it) or use a deliberate low blow.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
Ward makes your vagina gush in a horribly bad way. Seek help.Freedom2013 wrote:I was hoping until the fight with Ward was signed Kovalev would get Barrera for a nice KO win.Tanzio wrote:Nice numbers. You've got me there, but Barrera is more competitive according to my eye test. Bizier would have little to no chance v Porter. Barrera would give Fonfara all that he could handle, imo.
Sergey wouldn't need to hit after hearing the bell, deliberately head butt (good that the ref tonight warned Ward about it) or use a deliberate low blow.
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1795
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Who was more impressive: Kell Brook or Andre Ward?
Both were poor opponents. Ward schooling Barrera proves nothing, he's a continental fighter, nothing more. He shouldn't have been in the same ring with Ward, joke of a fight.
Bizier too for that matter, how the IBF could put him in an eliminator... facing Donut Dan who is also shit is baffling. Bizier isn't even top 20.
Bizier too for that matter, how the IBF could put him in an eliminator... facing Donut Dan who is also shit is baffling. Bizier isn't even top 20.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9011
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Who was more impressive: Kell Brook or Andre Ward?
The IBF seem quite adept at digging up manure to put in front Brook!tigermoth87 wrote:Both were poor opponents. Ward schooling Barrera proves nothing, he's a continental fighter, nothing more. He shouldn't have been in the same ring with Ward, joke of a fight.
Bizier too for that matter, how the IBF could put him in an eliminator... facing Donut Dan who is also poo is baffling. Bizier isn't even top 20.
In such a talent rich division, this is quite a remarkable achievement.
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1795
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Who was more impressive: Kell Brook or Andre Ward?
Yeah, looking at the rankings and leaving out the ones who are belt holders there are still a good number of fighters who were more deserving of an eliminator than Bizier.Syntax Error wrote:The IBF seem quite adept at digging up manure to put in front Brook!tigermoth87 wrote:Both were poor opponents. Ward schooling Barrera proves nothing, he's a continental fighter, nothing more. He shouldn't have been in the same ring with Ward, joke of a fight.
Bizier too for that matter, how the IBF could put him in an eliminator... facing Donut Dan who is also poo is baffling. Bizier isn't even top 20.
In such a talent rich division, this is quite a remarkable achievement.
Just realised it wasn't Donut Dan Ion who he faced in the eliminator to face Kell, he'd actually lost to Ion twice before...
What were the IBF thinking handing an eliminator to a guy who couldn't beat a fighter Kell beat in like 5 rounds? The guy he did face in the eliminator was the definition of padded record too... his best win being a split decision over Prescott.
Re: Who was more impressive: Kell Brook or Andre Ward?
Bizier turned up for a payday. The fight was meaningless.
Barrera tried but got outclassed.
Barrera tried but got outclassed.
Re: Who was more impressive: Kell Brook or Andre Ward?
Brook did say after the fight that he had to fight his mandatory or be stripped and that he wants to fight wbc champ Danny Garcia or the winner of Bradley pacquiao. He didn't rule out Khan either. He admitted he doesn't understand the IBF putting Bizier as mandatory.
Also on another note Billy Joe Saunders after the Eubank fight said he offered Eubank near a million for a rematch but he refused and that he wants a GGG fight stating he doesn't know how good he really is until he fights GGG.
Also on another note Billy Joe Saunders after the Eubank fight said he offered Eubank near a million for a rematch but he refused and that he wants a GGG fight stating he doesn't know how good he really is until he fights GGG.
Re: Who was more impressive today: Brook or Ward?
Of course Hunter will give Khan a chance, its his job. Like he said Khan had a good chance to beat Floyd if Amir raised the level of his game. (and added the level would have to be above a level he has never been at before)Lancenix wrote:He is downplaying Kahn's chances. I think we can all admit that on paper it is not a 50-50 fight. So where does it fall? 60-40? Even that is a little high. So I take the 30-70 and I am saying he is downplaying here knowing that kahn can outbox him. Kahn is not gonna sit there like Kirkland did. We know that. Will he run as much as Lara? No. Can he put up a better fight than Cotto? i think so and Cotto had that fight much closer than the HBO announcers gave him credit for. If Kahn boxes and moves I know he can win that fight.Tanzio wrote:I did not communicate that clearly. Hunter did not say that. I think that Hunter as a trainer gives Khan a 30% chance.Lancenix wrote:
That makes me feel good about Kahn's chances seeing as he is fighting at his highest weight and moving up a class. I respect what he has to say.
To me it is about 90%-10% in Canelo's favor since Khan said his power has tripled!, he is faster!, and claims his chin is much stronger! Even 90-10 is too much chance for Khan. I think he has about the same as a snowball's chance in hell.
As far as who was more impressive, I expected Brook to KO the guy that was beaten twice by a guy Brook KO'd. I thought Ward would win, but didn't think he would dominate like he did. Ward to me was more impressive.