Haye v Bellew

jameswilson · Post by **jameswilson** » 15 Oct 2016, 17:52

Looks like this fight is gonna happen given the amount of casual money that will be lapped up. Does anyone think Bellew has a chance? What weight do we reckon Bellew will come in at?

Finn · Post by **Finn** » 15 Oct 2016, 17:54

jameswilson wrote:Looks like this fight is gonna happen given the amount of casual money that will be lapped up. Does anyone think Bellew has a chance? What weight do we reckon Bellew will come in at?

He will be absolutely decimated

Ricky_ · Post by **Ricky_** » 15 Oct 2016, 17:54

Joke of a fight. Haye would ko Bellend without breakin sweat.

Zubrei · Post by **Zubrei** » 15 Oct 2016, 17:55

Jesus, I'm cringing.

Stevieb8006 · Post by **Stevieb8006** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:00

You'd have to favour haye heavily but it depends at what weight, getting down could take something out of haye. I thought he was looking smaller in his IFL vid.

ThereByTheGrace · Post by **ThereByTheGrace** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:01

Has to be Heavyweight Haye just said he can't make Cruiser. Absolute freak show.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:04

It'd have to be a catchweight, surely?

liamlion · Post by **liamlion** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:05

Suicide for Bellew.

samwbr · Post by **samwbr** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:06

Horse wrote:It'd have to be a catchweight, surely?

If he wants the cash so bad then he should move up.

emallini · Post by **emallini** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:12

Pointless joke of a fight

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:13

Haye would hurt Bellew with every punch he lands.

Finn · Post by **Finn** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:14

Horse wrote:It'd have to be a catchweight, surely?

It's the best option if it's going to happen, surely bellew doesn't believe he can move upto heavy weight or think that he is such a big draw that haye would bother boiling down at 36 years of age to fight at cruiser against him when all the money is at heavy weight.

Ricky_ · Post by **Ricky_** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:16

Horse wrote:It'd have to be a catchweight, surely?

why? it would make Bellew look ridiculous....

desperate to tear Haye's head off*.....

*under a contractually agreed weight limit

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:19

Finn wrote:It's the best option if it's going to happen, surely bellew doesn't believe he can move upto heavy weight or think that he is such a big draw that haye would bother boiling down at 36 years of age to fight at cruiser against him when all the money is at heavy weight.

What weight do you reckon then? 210 lbs? 215 lbs?

lefthook82 · Post by **lefthook82** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:20

Does this fight sell without a trinket?

As for how it goes, Haye would hurt him badly. Bellew would be too wary and he will see the difference in speed and power

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:21

Ricky_ wrote:why? it would make Bellew look ridiculous....

desperate to tear Haye's head off*.....

*under a contractually agreed weight limit

I don't think it'd make Bellew look bad, as long as he didn't try to demand anything daft as the catchweight.

gilgamesh · Post by **gilgamesh** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:21

Horse wrote:It'd have to be a catchweight, surely?

I don't see why it couldn't just be at Heavyweight. Haye's not a huge Heavyweight or nothing anyhow.

rossij8 · Post by **rossij8** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:22

Haye looked small tonight, but that could be the camera (not much bigger than Froch)

I agree a catch weight could be an option as Bellew is just going to be fatter

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:24

It'll be a one or two round blowout, but I'll watch it. I really don't like Bomber and will happily see him lose.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:24

gilgamesh wrote:I don't see why it couldn't just be at Heavyweight. Haye's not a huge Heavyweight or nothing anyhow.

Bellew would probably be less of an overwhelming underdog at a catchweight, so it would help to legitimise the fight a bit more.

rossij8 · Post by **rossij8** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:25

keithmoonhangover wrote:It'll be a one or two round blowout, but I'll watch it. I really don't like Bomber and will happily see him lose.

Will you pay though? I probably will

gilgamesh · Post by **gilgamesh** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:26

Horse wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:I don't see why it couldn't just be at Heavyweight. Haye's not a huge Heavyweight or nothing anyhow.
Bellew would probably be less of an overwhelming underdog at a catchweight, so it would help to legitimise the fight a bit more.

If Bellew wants him just fight the man at Heavyweight and Bellew might can come in at 210 or 215 himself. Size won't be an issue in my opinion. The skills will determine the winner. Nobody has a size advantage here significant enough that it's gonna be the determining factor in the fight.

ThereByTheGrace · Post by **ThereByTheGrace** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:27

rossij8 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:It'll be a one or two round blowout, but I'll watch it. I really don't like Bomber and will happily see him lose.
Will you pay though? I probably will

Go to the boozer, it wont last long and no commentary will be needed. It's hardly going to be up there with the detailed analysis of a Frampton- Santa Cruz fight.

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:27

rossij8 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:It'll be a one or two round blowout, but I'll watch it. I really don't like Bomber and will happily see him lose.
Will you pay though? I probably will

Damn right. It'll be a fantastic event.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 15 Oct 2016, 18:32

gilgamesh wrote:If Bellew wants him just fight the man at Heavyweight and Bellew might can come in at 210 or 215 himself. Size won't be an issue in my opinion. The skills will determine the winner. Nobody has a size advantage here significant enough that it's gonna be the determining factor in the fight.

Haye is the bigger man, so weight will be a factor.

Haye v Bellew

Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew

Re: Haye v Bellew