Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post Reply
stellar
Super Lightweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 19 Nov 2016, 07:00

Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by stellar »

4.11 stiverne vs breazele
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by crusader »

Does this mean Ortiz-Wilder is happening?
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by asdfjkl »

Remarkeble, the lab is still suspended for a couple of days more. I assume that's the reason Wilder waited.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Omg! Get on it slim!!!!!
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by candyslim »

This is just the kind of match-up I love: Not necessarily involving a title or even top fighters, but one you can see going either way. Stiverne has better boxing skills and probably the advantage in punching power. Both are very durable but can be stopped or dropped. Both are warriors who will keep coming as long as they are able.

I think it hinges on how much Stiverne has left. He's 38 now and since losing to Wilder in 2015, he's had just one fight winning a unanimous decision over journeyman Derric Rossy who put him on the floor. If Stiverne is still the fighter he was three years ago I'd favour him to win a decision but it is not looking good for him in my opinion.

Finally and sorry for being a pernickety old git but can we please give Bermane the respect of getting his name right. Everyone calls him "Ber-mayne" but it is in fact pronounced "Berman" ... says the guy who has been known to spell it wrong :oops:
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by apollo creed »

Decent fight.
apollo creed
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7254
Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by apollo creed »

crusader wrote:Does this mean Ortiz-Wilder is happening?
More likely Wilder vs Charles Martin or Wilder vs 'Injury' or a mix of both. :lol:
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by ValMar »

apollo creed wrote:Decent fight.
It might be....
FastestHandsInThewest
Super Lightweight
Posts: 174
Joined: 16 Jun 2017, 01:11

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by FastestHandsInThewest »

Breazele by tko.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26530
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by KiwiRider »

Hopefully this will end up with a proper #1 contender. It needs to happen and I'm glad it is. The only question is how long will it be before the winner of this gets their mandatory shot?
A year like the rules say?
Two years?
:maybe:
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by ElJefe »

Good fight. Breazeale's last fight was a brilliant watch, hopefully this one will be the same. I'll probably be rooting for him as I think he's got a bit more to offer the division in the future. Maybe not as a real threat to the champions, but at least at the level below.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7255
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by Oiky »

War Breazeale :box:
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26530
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by KiwiRider »

ElJefe wrote:Good fight. Breazeale's last fight was a brilliant watch, hopefully this one will be the same. I'll probably be rooting for him as I think he's got a bit more to offer the division in the future. Maybe not as a real threat to the champions, but at least at the level below.
Yes :TU:
Tactical master stroke or lucky break. I think the former. Plus he stopped Kevin Barry's latest hopeful and that made me happy and a Breazeale fan all in one fight.
I don't agree with previous posts that Breazeale will KO Stiverne. If Wilder couldn't do it, before he injured himself, what makes Breazeale different?
This is a big career making shot for Dominic, I hope he takes it seriously and comes in as fit as possible because Stiverne seems to be able to control pace and Dominic needs to outwork him like Wilder did to get the win.
In his favour Breazeale had been more active and is younger. I think he can do it ;-)
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by Badhusker »

Breazeale is far from a top heavy. He got his ass handed to him by 42 or 43? year old Mansour, losing every round until the fight got stopped because Mansour bit his tongue almost in half. His size advantage is his greatest asset, and it did him no good at all vs Mansour.

Stiverne is not only getting old, but is rusty as hell. Even fight. Neither guy deserves to be anywhere near a title shot.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46471
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by gilgamesh »

50/50 fight. Breazeale has never been too impressive, neither has Stiverne. Breazeale has heart, and punching power of his own, and he's a better ex-football player turned boxer than Derric Rossy was, and Stiverne had a hard time with Rossy so...I'm taking Breazeale to win.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by asdfjkl »

But then why is it not scheduled on boxrec? Because the lab in California that helped Stiverne and Wilder is still suspended because of all their "mistakes" around innocent Povetkin for example?
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14049
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by Evander »

Stiverne hasn't fought for almost 2 years.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by Badhusker »

asdfjkl wrote:But then why is it not scheduled on boxrec? Because the lab in California that helped Stiverne and Wilder is still suspended because of all their "mistakes" around innocent Povetkin for example?

Can you just STFU about that unless you would show it has any truth to it? You re like a broken record. :brick:
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by candyslim »

Badhusker wrote:Breazeale is far from a top heavy. He got his ass handed to him by 42 or 43? year old Mansour, losing every round until the fight got stopped because Mansour bit his tongue almost in half. His size advantage is his greatest asset, and it did him no good at all vs Mansour.

Stiverne is not only getting old, but is rusty as hell. Even fight. Neither guy deserves to be anywhere near a title shot.
Mansour was giving him a lesson but Breazeale is an ex-football player with little or no amateur boxing experience. He's learning as he goes along and the Ugonoh result suggests at least some improvement. I'm sure Mansour didn't just bite his tongue either, Breazeale wasn't just a spectator in that incident.

When you look down the list, how many names there really deserve a title shot, but someone has to get one? You know what they say about the kingdom of the blind don't you?
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Stiverne vs breazele is official

Post by asdfjkl »

Badhusker wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:But then why is it not scheduled on boxrec? Because the lab in California that helped Stiverne and Wilder is still suspended because of all their "mistakes" around innocent Povetkin for example?
Can you just STFU about that unless you would show it has any truth to it? You re like a broken record. :brick:
"The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has suspended its accreditation of the UCLA UCLA Laboratory as it relates to analysis of specific prohibited substances, effective 14 June 2017 for a period of three months. The suspension of these analyses by the UCLA Laboratory -- which is located in Los Angeles, California, United States -- is a result of WADA’s quality assessment procedures that identified non-conformities with best practice."

But I gladly get proven wrong, please note that I already wrote this over two months ago:
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... 1#p4701971
And still didn't get proven wrong, despite this was politely asked several times.

In 4 days, or very soon after that, they will probably make the date official. It's all predicted a long long time ago and currently, everything seems to be predicted perfectly correct.


Also note that some sources write:
Sunday 5th November 2017 03:00
And they already wrote that over a month ago! Now how can they know that and if this is already known, then why don't they advert this in any way whatsoever?
Post Reply