Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - June 9th 2018
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - June 9th 2018
for the vacant WBO Super Lightweight Title...
Last edited by wesshaw1985 on 13 Apr 2018, 08:04, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Hopefully Flanagan wins then takes on Josh Taylor in an all British scrap. I'd take Taylor to beat him just now 
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Yeah possibility. The Catterall fight could end up a good dust up actually. Easy to make as well as both guys are under Fwank.wesshaw1985 wrote: ↑13 Dec 2017, 11:39I reckon if Flanagan wins he faces Jack Catterall first. The Taylor fight would be a fun one though...
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Should be a comfortable win for Flanagan. Hooker is pretty poor.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Only watched Hooker once (vs Perez) and he was shite. Flanagan should win comfortably.
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
havent heard of hooker before ,doesnt look a banger ,as he hasnt ko his last 3 , i assume flangans camp must fancy it as there is tastier fights out there
-
Dwayne Rudenkoslav
- Welterweight
- Posts: 55
- Joined: 02 Mar 2016, 21:16
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Whos Hooker I bet hes another great black hope bum
-
TheGingerBomber
- Lightweight
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Darleys Perez beat the shit out of him
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
if this fight does come off in April at the M.E.N should have Jack Catterall on the card also against Jose Zepeda or Anthony Yigit for the right to face the winner.
With Tyson Fury and/or Amir Khans return attached aswell would be a big card for Manchester...
With Tyson Fury and/or Amir Khans return attached aswell would be a big card for Manchester...
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Another totally uninteresting Flanagan fight. To think we had talk of Garcia and Crolla for so long and now this is the reality.
Needs a co-headliner even if it's just Khan knocking over a nobody. Why the insistence of having Flanagan at the MEN I don't know.
Needs a co-headliner even if it's just Khan knocking over a nobody. Why the insistence of having Flanagan at the MEN I don't know.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103290
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
He sells what at the MEN? 2,000-3,000?
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
where else can Flanagan fight?
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
mo hooker is awful.looked a clueless amateur vs perez . what an awful decision that was. robbery of 2016
flanagan
flanagan
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
We've been through this before, but there's nowhere else in Manchester or the surrounding areas, so it's there or fight away all the time.
Victoria Warehouse - Too small. About 1500 cap I'd estimate for Boxing. That would be a tight squeeze. Probs not even that.
Central (Formerly G-Mex) - No seats, not held boxing in around a decade.
Velodrome - Not held boxing since Flanagan-Zepeda when there was trouble.
Everywhere else unsuitable (Opera House? Apollo?) or capped at 1000 or less. Or go outdoors (Academy Stadium, Regional Athletics Arena), but those have similar cap to MEN taking into account floor seats.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
M.E.N it is...Stuffs wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:16We've been through this before, but there's nowhere else in Manchester or the surrounding areas, so it's there or fight away all the time.
Victoria Warehouse - Too small. About 1500 cap I'd estimate for Boxing. That would be a tight squeeze. Probs not even that.
Central (Formerly G-Mex) - No seats, not held boxing in around a decade.
Velodrome - Not held boxing since Flanagan-Zepeda when there was trouble.
Everywhere else unsuitable (Opera House? Apollo?) or capped at 1000 or less. Or go outdoors (Academy Stadium, Regional Athletics Arena), but those have similar cap to MEN taking into account floor seats.
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Why does he have to fight in Manchester? Warren has just had Williams Smith in Newcastle.Stuffs wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:16We've been through this before, but there's nowhere else in Manchester or the surrounding areas, so it's there or fight away all the time.
Victoria Warehouse - Too small. About 1500 cap I'd estimate for Boxing. That would be a tight squeeze. Probs not even that.
Central (Formerly G-Mex) - No seats, not held boxing in around a decade.
Velodrome - Not held boxing since Flanagan-Zepeda when there was trouble.
Everywhere else unsuitable (Opera House? Apollo?) or capped at 1000 or less. Or go outdoors (Academy Stadium, Regional Athletics Arena), but those have similar cap to MEN taking into account floor seats.
I get the idea of building a regional fanbase but barely anyone seems to turn up to Flanagan fights leading to a pretty dismal atmosphere. Seems odd that a guy like him has to fight at an absolutely cavernous arena with no hope in hell of selling a quarter of it.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
if you were Flanagans promoter where would you put this fight?dirk2686 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:31Why does he have to fight in Manchester? Warren has just had Williams Smith in Newcastle.Stuffs wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:16We've been through this before, but there's nowhere else in Manchester or the surrounding areas, so it's there or fight away all the time.
Victoria Warehouse - Too small. About 1500 cap I'd estimate for Boxing. That would be a tight squeeze. Probs not even that.
Central (Formerly G-Mex) - No seats, not held boxing in around a decade.
Velodrome - Not held boxing since Flanagan-Zepeda when there was trouble.
Everywhere else unsuitable (Opera House? Apollo?) or capped at 1000 or less. Or go outdoors (Academy Stadium, Regional Athletics Arena), but those have similar cap to MEN taking into account floor seats.
I get the idea of building a regional fanbase but barely anyone seems to turn up to Flanagan fights leading to a pretty dismal atmosphere. Seems odd that a guy like him has to fight at an absolutely cavernous arena with no hope in hell of selling a quarter of it.
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Depends where it could make money. Local fighters don't have to fight local. Khan (Bolton) sold out in Newcastle with an undercard topped by Mitchell (Dagenham), Bellew (Liverpool), DeGale (London) and Maccarinelli (Swansea). Groves v Eubank will feature two fighters from the South in Manchester next year for a fight which looks like doing cracking business.wesshaw1985 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:39if you were Flanagans promoter where would you put this fight?
There must be some method in the (seeming) madness but I can't understand repeatedly making fights in a venue that must cost considerable money to use when you're selling a few thousand tickets at best.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Manchester with the right card will do fine.dirk2686 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:44Depends where it could make money. Local fighters don't have to fight local. Khan (Bolton) sold out in Newcastle with an undercard topped by Mitchell (Dagenham), Bellew (Liverpool), DeGale (London) and Maccarinelli (Swansea). Groves v Eubank will feature two fighters from the South in Manchester next year for a fight which looks like doing cracking business.wesshaw1985 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:39if you were Flanagans promoter where would you put this fight?
There must be some method in the (seeming) madness but I can't understand repeatedly making fights in a venue that must cost considerable money to use when you're selling a few thousand tickets at best.
Flanagan vs. Hooker - WBO Super-LW Title
Fury/Khan vs. TBA
Catterall vs. Zepeda/Yigit - WBO Super-LW Title Eliminator
Nathan Gorman vs. Nick Webb - English HW Title
Zelfa Barrett on the undercard.
Can't see why it wouldn't do decent numbers...
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Fury couldn't get close to selling out half the MEN against Klitschko, but admittedly the prices were pretty crazy. He's also still very big - April would be a push to get him fighting.wesshaw1985 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:50Manchester with the right card will do fine.dirk2686 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:44Depends where it could make money. Local fighters don't have to fight local. Khan (Bolton) sold out in Newcastle with an undercard topped by Mitchell (Dagenham), Bellew (Liverpool), DeGale (London) and Maccarinelli (Swansea). Groves v Eubank will feature two fighters from the South in Manchester next year for a fight which looks like doing cracking business.wesshaw1985 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:39if you were Flanagans promoter where would you put this fight?
There must be some method in the (seeming) madness but I can't understand repeatedly making fights in a venue that must cost considerable money to use when you're selling a few thousand tickets at best.
Flanagan vs. Hooker - WBO Super-LW Title
Fury/Khan vs. TBA
Catterall vs. Zepeda/Yigit - WBO Super-LW Title Eliminator
Nathan Gorman vs. Nick Webb - English HW Title
Zelfa Barrett on the undercard.
Can't see why it wouldn't do decent numbers...
Khan can obviously do well at the MEN but surely it's a big ask to expect him to come back from fighting Canelo to appear on a Terry Flanagan undercard? All of Flanagan's MEN cards have been poor so whilst I accept Flanagan himself on a fully fit competitive Fury or Khan card looks perfectly reasonable there's still a lot of questions about either of them being involved. Which leaves the prospect of Flanagan yet again headlining an empty arena with chief support from Catterall. Surely that can't make business sense in a 20k venue?
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Flanagan by decision
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
I don't know, maybe they'll just open the lower half to keep costs down.dirk2686 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2017, 06:56 Fury couldn't get close to selling out half the MEN against Klitschko, but admittedly the prices were pretty crazy. He's also still very big - April would be a push to get him fighting.
Khan can obviously do well at the MEN but surely it's a big ask to expect him to come back from fighting Canelo to appear on a Terry Flanagan undercard? All of Flanagan's MEN cards have been poor so whilst I accept Flanagan himself on a fully fit competitive Fury or Khan card looks perfectly reasonable there's still a lot of questions about either of them being involved. Which leaves the prospect of Flanagan yet again headlining an empty arena with chief support from Catterall. Surely that can't make business sense in a 20k venue?
Regardless, I reckon it'll be happening in the M.E.N and I hope it goes well...
-
weelegs
- Heavyweight

Re: Terry Flanagan vs. Maurice Hooker - TBA
Surely he could fight in Manchester Central? Smaller location for him and still in manc?