Adam Kownacki vs Gerald Washington on the undercard too.


Saw this before. So if I don’t buy DeGale-Eubank, I can’t watch the Dirrell-Yildrim?
Looks that wayRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 12:26Saw this before. So if I don’t buy DeGale-Eubank, I can’t watch the Dirrell-Yildrim?
Fučks sake!!!
This is for the full title, yes. Manny is the 'regular' champion. Totally agree regarding the regular/interim titles, ridiculous.Jackson328 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 15:24 Is this for the actual, real, genuine, bona fide WBA 147 title?
Because lots of people are walking around today convinced that they saw Pacman retain the WBA welter title by beating Broner![]()
Is Manny the 'regular' champ or is that yet another belt of the deluded and ridiculous WBA?![]()
I thought so but the media conveniently forget to add the 'interim' word when they're talking about the event. Is there any other major sport that does this? I can't think of one. In fact how many other major sports have multiple world governing bodies? It is insane. Tennis, cricket and golf don't have a world championship tournament as such but they all have a ranking system so at least we know who is number one in the world but most sports are quite adamant who their world champion(s) is/are. The mainstream and trade media could start to sort it out but they are not interested.NoScoutingReports wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 15:31This is for the full title, yes. Manny is the 'regular' champion. Totally agree regarding the regular/interim titles, ridiculous.Jackson328 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 15:24 Is this for the actual, real, genuine, bona fide WBA 147 title?
Because lots of people are walking around today convinced that they saw Pacman retain the WBA welter title by beating Broner![]()
Is Manny the 'regular' champ or is that yet another belt of the deluded and ridiculous WBA?![]()
My Tivo always suggests to record live programmes longer which I always doRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 06:37 I advise no one to record this and just watch it live. Don’t wanna hear no recording fail stories. Lol
I’ve gone out for the night and forgotten to record the boxing againRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 15:13 Right guys..
I checked the schedule for tonight..
ITV4
Big Fight Night Live
1:00am-4:00am (3 hours )
They are showing 3 fights. It SHOULD finish before 4am, as long as there are no delays and who knows, if previous fights end early, they won’t wait too long for the next fight.
Now.. I have a feeling.. that it might.. just might.. go past 4am..
Usually New York main events are around 3am..
If THIS CARD goes PAST the scheduled end time on the event, ITV will really need to review this and just have it set to 1am-5am in the future. Because it seems everyone is missing out on half the main event, the fight that we all actually want to see.
Enjoy the fight guys.
Btw, how many of my fellow Brits are actually watching this live?
Well what time are you back?Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 15:16 I’ve gone out for the night and forgotten to record the boxing again![]()
Not sure, but I fully intend to be completely fvcked whenever I do get home, and will certainly be in no fit state to record anythingRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 15:20Well what time are you back?Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 15:16 I’ve gone out for the night and forgotten to record the boxing again![]()
This seems a fair enough deal to me !Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 12:26Saw this before. So if I don’t buy DeGale-Eubank, I can’t watch the Dirrell-Yildrim?
Fučks sake!!!
It’s £19.99 mateskanksta wrote: ↑26 Jan 2019, 17:31This seems a fair enough deal to me !Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑20 Jan 2019, 12:26Saw this before. So if I don’t buy DeGale-Eubank, I can’t watch the Dirrell-Yildrim?
Fučks sake!!!
I'm trying to imagine the subset of UK viewers that are desperate to see Dirrell vs Yildrim, but adamant they won't pay £16.95 for DeGale vs CEJ.![]()