Sweet Pea VS PBF who wins and why at Jr welter

raulc002 · Post by **raulc002** » 24 Apr 2006, 17:39

Sweet Pea VS PBF who wins and why?

vagabundo55 · Post by **vagabundo55** » 24 Apr 2006, 18:22

I think this would be a very boring fight, although it is an interesting match up, for some reason I think Mayweather would pull out the decision with his speed. It'd be one of those fights in which they feint for most of the round and have one or two exchanges.

theone · Post by **theone** » 24 Apr 2006, 20:17

Sweat pea wins it easy. 12UD

BoxBuzz · Post by **BoxBuzz** » 24 Apr 2006, 20:20

Really? this seems like a great chess match between two master craftsman. Hard to predict or even imagine a blowout either way.

Migz · Post by **Migz** » 24 Apr 2006, 22:35

theone wrote:Sweat pea wins it easy. 12UD

Thats how i have it Sweet Pea UD. He seems much to superior for PBF

adspath · Post by **adspath** » 24 Apr 2006, 23:22

Migz wrote:
theone wrote:Sweat pea wins it easy. 12UD
Thats how i have it Sweet Pea UD. He seems much to superior for PBF

I agree..If Mayweather fought back in Whittaker's time he wouldnt be as great

generic screen name · Post by **generic screen name** » 25 Apr 2006, 00:54

adspath wrote:
Migz wrote:
theone wrote:Sweat pea wins it easy. 12UD
Thats how i have it Sweet Pea UD. He seems much to superior for PBF
I agree..If Mayweather fought back in Whittaker's time he wouldnt be as great

If they fought in the same era they'd never fight each other.

Can go either way in my book, my money's on Whitaker.

Ezzard · Post by **Ezzard** » 25 Apr 2006, 02:14

This is an odd one. Mayweather has some great skills. He is excellent defensively. Whittaker relied more on his movement and reflexes and he was quicker on his feet. I think Whittaker's style was very difficult to beat and I think you need a power punching swarmer or a Lightweight Tommy Hearns to beat him.

Migz · Post by **Migz** » 25 Apr 2006, 02:45

WHitaker's a different calibre of opposition to any boxer mayweathers ever faced

dr_devious · Post by **dr_devious** » 25 Apr 2006, 04:06

Difficult one to pick, Whittaker's whole career was brilliant, as has Mayweather's so far. Maybe we will find out a flaw in Mayweather at some point which we didnt really in Whittaker other than a lack of punch power maybe. This would be a close, close decision one way or the other, Whittaker faced better opposition, so I'd lean towards Whittaker

Migz · Post by **Migz** » 25 Apr 2006, 04:58

i still say Whitaker UD..and wat about azumah nelson decagon? Whitaker whipped him and he was as high calibre fighter than any of the guys Mayweather has faced

Les Darcy · Post by **Les Darcy** » 25 Apr 2006, 07:49

i think whitaker would beat him, i think floyd struggles with southpaws and i know he beat judah but judah is judah, a predictable 4 round fighter who loses when things dont go his way the whole time, whitaker was too crafty for floyd, sweet pea by unanimous decision

sockdolager · Post by **sockdolager** » 25 Apr 2006, 08:38

At 140 Whitiker would confuse and beat Floyd on a pretty easy decision. At 135 I think Floyd was still quick enough to compete. Floyd would lose to Pernell at 135, just not as easy a time.

walshb · Post by **walshb** » 25 Apr 2006, 10:13

Two fantasitic fighters and defensive wizards. But PBF has extra speed and volume. He has everything as good as Pernell and he an also fight extremel well on he retrat. If PBF pushes the fight, he has the speed and defense to beat Pea, and if somehow Pea pushes PBF, then PBF can also use his blazing speed on te backfoot. Very close fight but PBF by UD....

mattyp151 · Post by **mattyp151** » 25 Apr 2006, 10:26

Draw....total punches landed, 19.