Name The Worst Fighter...
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Name The Worst Fighter...
...to beat one of your favourites. Tommy Morrison bested my all-time favourite fighter George Foreman 
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Kevin McBride.
Tyson would have avenged ALL his losses in his prime.... and then some
Tyson would have avenged ALL his losses in his prime.... and then some
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Tyson always loses to the Real Deal.
Lynn Ball beating Ron Lyle.
Lynn Ball beating Ron Lyle.
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
zaheer rahem i wont forgive him for beating morales
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Taylor beating Hopkins.
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Trevor Berbick beating Muhammad Ali... :(
A prime Ali could beat Berbick 30 rounds in a row...
Or just stop him in 6...
Ali...Bom bie yay!!!!
A prime Ali could beat Berbick 30 rounds in a row...
Or just stop him in 6...
Ali...Bom bie yay!!!!
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Bob Stallings over Earnie Shavers
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
He outran him & got derided in the press for his tactics.Goodnight, Irene wrote:...to beat one of your favourites. Tommy Morrison bested my all-time favourite fighter George Foreman
If he had actually stood & punched it out with Foreman, it could only go one way.
That 'loss' didn't hurt Foremans image one bit.
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
observer1 wrote:Kevin McBride.
Tyson would have avenged ALL his losses in his prime.... and then some
Tyson couldn't handle Holyfield standing up to him in 84, couldn't in 96, wouldn't at any point in his life. Holyfield always always aaaaaalways comes out on top against Tyson.
I cant see how Tyson could ever beat Buster Douglas either.
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Are you kidding me?overhand_right wrote:observer1 wrote:Kevin McBride.
Tyson would have avenged ALL his losses in his prime.... and then some
Tyson couldn't handle Holyfield standing up to him in 84, couldn't in 96, wouldn't at any point in his life. Holyfield always always aaaaaalways comes out on top against Tyson.
I cant see how Tyson could ever beat Buster Douglas either.
I respect your opinion about Holyfield. I personally see a prime Tyson beating a prime Holyfield.
As for Buster Douglas.. I'm not even going to answer that,
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Rafael Gandarilla or Ignacio Madrid over the once-great Ruben Oliviares. Very sad. . .
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
the night morrison fought foreman, the duke turned into a 226 pound sweet pea, but really no one cares, i would have wanted to go toe to toe with a legend and get ko'd than to of won like that
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Neveretheless, it's tough to swallow. Foreman lost, legitimatelyoverhand_right wrote:He outran him & got derided in the press for his tactics.Goodnight, Irene wrote:...to beat one of your favourites. Tommy Morrison bested my all-time favourite fighter George Foreman
If he had actually stood & punched it out with Foreman, it could only go one way.
That 'loss' didn't hurt Foremans image one bit.
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
In 84 I don't think Holyfield could beat Tyson, but I also respect your opinion on that Holyfield was an all time great.observer1 wrote:Are you kidding me?overhand_right wrote:observer1 wrote:Kevin McBride.
Tyson would have avenged ALL his losses in his prime.... and then some
Tyson couldn't handle Holyfield standing up to him in 84, couldn't in 96, wouldn't at any point in his life. Holyfield always always aaaaaalways comes out on top against Tyson.
I cant see how Tyson could ever beat Buster Douglas either.
I respect your opinion about Holyfield. I personally see a prime Tyson beating a prime Holyfield.
As for Buster Douglas.. I'm not even going to answer that,
But Douglas was just one lucky bum and I would say the worst heavyweight champ of all time.
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
In 84 I don't think Holyfield could beat Tyson, but I also respect your opinion on that Holyfield was an all time great.Grimm wrote:Are you kidding me?observer1 wrote:[quote="overhand_right
Tyson couldn't handle Holyfield standing up to him in 84, couldn't in 96, wouldn't at any point in his life. Holyfield always always aaaaaalways comes out on top against Tyson.
I cant see how Tyson could ever beat Buster Douglas either.
I respect your opinion about Holyfield. I personally see a prime Tyson beating a prime Holyfield.
As for Buster Douglas.. I'm not even going to answer that,
But Douglas was just one lucky bum and I would say the worst heavyweight champ of all time.[/quote]
that night he wasnt lucky he was quick and powerful he showed what he sould of been
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Yeah, right.tennessee wrote:the night morrison fought foreman, the duke turned into a 226 pound sweet pea, but really no one cares, i would have wanted to go toe to toe with a legend and get ko'd than to of won like that
A world title belt. A legend's name in your column. Untold riches on the back of the victory.
Or get KO'd.
Hmm, how could I ever choose which would be best for my career?
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Overall, Pat Lawler (although you could argue it wasn't a "real" loss). Then Omar Gonzalez.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
That's Manos de Piedra, innit Emerson?Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Overall, Pat Lawler (although you could argue it wasn't a "real" loss). Then Omar Gonzalez.
Personally I nominate Uriah Grant.
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Cholo, Himself. I'm guessing yours is Hearns?Datsue wrote:That's Manos de Piedra, innit Emerson?Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Overall, Pat Lawler (although you could argue it wasn't a "real" loss). Then Omar Gonzalez.
Personally I nominate Uriah Grant.
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
[/quote]Novelty goat wrote:Not sure what press clippings you were reading. I don't recall any controversey about the decision. George did catch him flush once or twice but Tommy took it well.
Check out Boxing Illustrated, Bert Sugars editorial and coverage, BI had Foreman winning, Bert covered the ringside reporters views many of whom felt the same way, Wally Matthews in the NY Times also laid into Morrison in his editorial.
My guess is you probably never even have read any coverage of the fight.
As for 'taking it well', if turning completely around and walking away is taking a punch well. . . You're entitled to your opinion.
-
overhand_right
- Heavyweight

Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
observer1 wrote: I respect your opinion about Holyfield. I personally see a prime Tyson beating a prime Holyfield.
As for Buster Douglas.. I'm not even going to answer that,
Well, a Tyson in the prime of his life lost 9 of 10 rds to Douglas and was completely outclassed... So i dont see what else he could do to reverse the fight, unless Douglas comes in out of shape.
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
So are you meaning to tell me you think Tyson came in with his best training/coach team in his corner. Had trained 100% for this fight, and did not do anything stupid outside the ring. Do you actually feel Tyson was prepared for this fight like he was when he became champion?overhand_right wrote:observer1 wrote: I respect your opinion about Holyfield. I personally see a prime Tyson beating a prime Holyfield.
As for Buster Douglas.. I'm not even going to answer that,
Well, a Tyson in the prime of his life lost 9 of 10 rds to Douglas and was completely outclassed... So i dont see what else he could do to reverse the fight, unless Douglas comes in out of shape.
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Prime would be Tyson coming to fight at his best.overhand_right wrote:observer1 wrote: I respect your opinion about Holyfield. I personally see a prime Tyson beating a prime Holyfield.
As for Buster Douglas.. I'm not even going to answer that,
Well, a Tyson in the prime of his life lost 9 of 10 rds to Douglas and was completely outclassed... So i dont see what else he could do to reverse the fight, unless Douglas comes in out of shape.
This night would not be considered Tyson's prime.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
Fighters have off-nights, come in out-of-form, & prepare poorly...that does not, however, mean they are not still in their primes.
Re: Name The Worst Fighter...
You're right. Tyson was not 1/10th of the fighter that wiped the floor with Bonecrusher Smith and Tony Tucker.observer1 wrote: So are you meaning to tell me you think Tyson came in with his best training/coach team in his corner. Had trained 100% for this fight, and did not do anything stupid outside the ring. Do you actually feel Tyson was prepared for this fight like he was when he became champion?
