Well it depends on the definition... if by quality we mean "elite" champion - then Woods should not be included, irrespective of his return, no man who loses as comprehensively as Clinton did should be considered "elite".Spud wrote:Haye
Calzaghe
Hatton
Witter
Froch - He will be the one everyone talks about soon.
I have left out Clinton until I know what he is doing.
Had this debate with Terry D regarding Gatti... Terry stressed that Gatti shouldn't be considered World class - but what Terry calls world class - I'd call elite.
Woods lies in world class.
For me we have 3 elite fighters - Joe, Haye, Hatton (was far more competitive vs Mayweather than Woods was vs Tarver).
We have 4 world class fighters - Witter (not proven enough against quality to move up to the next level yet IMO), Woods, Enzo Mac (especially given the Braithwaite result a couple of weeks back) and Froch.